Browse > Article

Analysis of Implant Prosthesis using 2-Dimensional Finite Element Method  

Kwon, Ho-Beom (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, Chan-Je (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lee, Seok-Hyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.22, no.4, 2006 , pp. 341-348 More about this Journal
Abstract
Accurate fit of the implant prosthesis is important in ensuring long term success of osseointegrated implant. Inaccurate fit of the implant prosthesis may give rise to complications and mechanical failure. To evaluate fite of the implant prosthesis, the development of the methods of analyzing the degree of misfit is important in clinical practice. To analyze the degree of the misfit of implant prosthesis, modal testing was used. A 2-dimensional finite element modal testing was accomplished. Four 2-dimensional finite element models with various levels of misfit of implant prostheses were constructed. Thickness gauges were simulated to make misfit in the implant prostheses. With eigenvalue analysis, the natural frequencies of the models were found in the frequency domain representation of vibration. According to the difference of degree of misfit, natural frequencies of the models were changed.
Keywords
Modal testing; finite element method; natural frequency; fit;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Albrektsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30: 151-174
2 Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984; 86:95-111   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Carr AB, Garard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:500-509   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:151-158
5 Huang HM, Pan LC, Lee SY, Chiu CL, Fan KH, Ho KN. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:285-291   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:450-458
7 Williams KR, Williams AD. Impulse response of a dental implant in bone by numerical analysis. Biomaterials 1997;18:715-719   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:620-625
9 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387-416   DOI
10 Elias JJ, Brunski JB, Scarton HA. A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:728-734
11 The Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineering. Handbook of noise and vibration. Seoul; 1995:279-291
12 Jemt T, Lie A. Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 172-180   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi, T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66-75
14 Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:592-599   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kaneko T. Pulsed oscillation technique for assessing the mechanical state of the dental implant-bone interface. Biomaterials 1991;12:555-560   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-848   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276
18 Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-267   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Cox J, Zarb G. Alternative prosthodontic superstructure designs. Swed Dent J Suppl 1985;28:71-75
20 Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-178
21 Silva J, Maia N. Modal analysis and testing. Splinger; 1989:430-446
22 Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-78   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Patra AK, DePaolo JM, D'Souza KS, DeTolla D, Meenaghan MA. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent 1998;7:355-368   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BE. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:596-604   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Thomson WT. Theory of vibration with applications. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1997:128-135