Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11109/JAES.2014.20.3.97

Effect of Types of Milking Instrument and Season on Milk Composition in Holstein-Friesian lactating Cows  

Nam, In-Sik (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Heo, Byong-Moo (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Park, Ho-Kyung (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Min, Tae-Hong (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Son, Yong-Suk (Division of Biotechnology, Korea University)
Park, Seong-Min (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.)
Kwon, Eung-Gi (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.)
Chang, Kyeong-Man (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Environmental Science / v.20, no.3, 2014 , pp. 97-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the effect of different types of milking instrument and season on milk composition (fat, protein, non-fat milk solids, milk urea nitrogen and somatic cell count) on Holstein-Friesian lactating cows. Raw milk samples were collected from 20 automatic milking system (AMS) installed dairy farms and 85 conventional milking system (CMS) installed dairy farms. Milk fat, protein, NFMS and MUN contents did not changed between AMS and CMS and different seasons. On the other hand, the average SCC in AMS was $239{\times}10^3cells/mL$ which was lower than in CMS ($373{\times}10^3cells/mL$, (p<0.05). In conclusion, present results indicated that SCC in milk might be influenced by AMS. However, this area needed more study to confirm the reason of reducing SCC content from AMS.
Keywords
Automatic milking system; Conventional milking system; Season; Milk compositions;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aganga, A.H., Umna, N.N., Oyendipe, E.O., Okoh, P.N., Aduku, A.O., 1990. Response to water deprivation by yankasa ewes under different physiological states. Small Rumin. Res. 3, 109-115.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Allore, H.G., Oltenacu, P.A., Erb, H.N., 1997. Effects of season, hard size, and geographic region on the composition and quality of milk in the Northeast. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 3040-3049.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bennedsgaard, T.W., Rasmussen, M.D., Pedersen, L.H., Bjerring, M., 2006. Changes in herd health and conversion to automatic milking systems. In: 11th XI International Symposium of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Australia, Cairns, 864.
4 de Koning, K., Slaghuis, B., van der Vorst, Y., 2003. Robotic milking and milk quality: Effects on bacterial counts, somatic cell counts, freezing points and free fatty acids. Ital. J. Animl. Sci. 2, 291-299.
5 Berglund, I., Pettersson, G., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., 2002. Automatic milking: Effects on somatic cell count and teat end quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78, 115-124.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Berman, A., Folman, Y.M., Kaim, M., Maman, Z., Herz, D., Wolfenson, A., Garber, Y., 1985. Upper critical temperatures and forced ventilation effects for highyielding dairy cows in a tropical climate. J. Dairy Sci. 68, 488-495.
7 Collier, R.J., Beede, D.K., Thatcher, W.W., Israel, L.A., Wilcox, C.J., 1982. Influences of environmental and its modification on dairy animal health and production. J. Dairy Sci. 65, 2213-2227.   DOI
8 Hagen, K., Langbein, J., Schmied, C., Lexer, D., Waiblinger, S., 2005. Heart rate variability in dairy cows-Influences of breed and milking system. Physiol. Behave. 85, 195-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Hamann, J., Reinecke, F., 2002. Machine milking effects on udder health comparison of a conventional with a robotic milking system. In: International Symposium 1th Robotic Milking: Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Wageningen, Netherlands, Wageningen., IV-17-IV-27.
10 Hof, G., Vervoorn, M.D., Lenaers, P.J., 1997. Milk urea nitrogen as a tool to monitor the protein nutrition of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 3333-3340.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kadzere, C.T., Murphy, M.R., Shianikove, N., Maltz, E., 2002. Heat stress in lactating cows; a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 77, 59-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Klei L.R., Lynch, J.M., Barbano, D.M., Oltenacu, P.A., Lednor, A.J., Bandler, D.K., 1997. Influence of milking three times a day on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 427-436.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Klungel, G.H., Slaghuis, B.A., Hogeveen, H., 2000. The effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 1998-2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kwon, D.J., Kim, W., Lee, D.W., 2002. Position analysis of cow teats for teat-cup attachment system on robotic milking system. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 8(3), 159-164.
15 Ki, K.S., Jeong, Y.H., Park, S.J., Kim, S.B., Lee, W.S., Lee, H.J., Lim, D.H., Kim, H.S., Kwon, E.G., Cho, M.Y., Jeo, J.M., 2011. Comparison of milk yield and milk composition between before and after auto milking system (AMS) use in dairy cow. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 17(3), 189-196.
16 Nam, K.T., Kim K.H., Nam, I.S., Abanto Oliver D., Hwang S.G., 2009. Seasonal and regional effects on milk composition of dairy cows in South Korea. J. Animl. Sci. & Technol. 51(6), 537-542.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Ki, K.S., Kim, J.H., Jeong, Y.H., Kim, Y.H., Park, S.J., Kim, S.B., Lee, W.S., Lee, H.J., Cho, W.M., Baek, K.S., Kim, H.S., Kwon, E.G., Kim, W.Y., Jeo, J.M., 2011. A Survey on satisfaction measurement of automatic milking system in domestic dairy farm. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 17(1), 39-48.
18 McDowell, R.E., Hooven, N.W. and camoens, J.K., 1976. Effect of climate on performance of Holsteins in first lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 59, 965-973.   DOI
19 National Statistical Office., 1984-2013. livestock trend investigation. (retrieved 2014.04.25.).
20 Rasmussen, M.D., Blom, J.Y., H Nielsen, L.A., Justesen, P., 2001. Udder health of cows milked automatically. Livest. Prod. Sci. 72, 147-156.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Roenfeldt. S., 1998. You can't afford to ignore heat stress. Dairy Manage. (retrieved 1998.05.01.).
22 Roseler, D.K, Ferguson, J.D. and Sniffen, C.J., 1993. Dietary protein degradability effects on plasma, milk urea nitrogen and milk nonprotein nitrogen in holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76, 525-534.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Svennersten-Sjaunja K.M., Pettersson, G., 2007. Pro and cons of automatic milking in Europe. J. Animl. Sci. 2008. 86, 37-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Sharma, A.K., Rodriguez, L.A., Mekonnen, G., Wilcox, C.J., Bachman, K.C., Collier, R.J., 1983. Climatological and genetic effects on milk composition and yield. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 119-126.   DOI
25 Speroni, M., Pirlo, G., Lolli, S., 2006. Effect of automatic milking systems on milk yield in a hot environment. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 4687-4693.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Berglund, I., Pettersson, G., 2000. The milking process in an automated milking system, evaluation of milk yield, teat condition and udder health. in: robotic milking: proceedings of the international symposium held in lelystad, Netherlands, Wageningen, 277-288.
27 The Meteorological Administration., 2009-2013. Weather chronological list. (retrieved 2014.07.29.).
28 Yagi, Y., Shiono, H., Chikayama, Y., Ohunuma, A., Nakamura, I., Yayou, K.-I., 2004. Transport stress increases somatic cell counts in milk, and enhances the migration capacity of peripheral blood neutrophils of dairy cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 66, 381-387.   DOI   ScienceOn