Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11109/JAES.2015.21.2.65

Correlation Analysis Between Milking Levels and Automatic Milking System of Dairy Cattle  

Nam, In-Sik (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Chang, Kyeong-Man (Department of Animal Life and Environment Science, Hankyong National University)
Son, Yong-Suk (Division of Biotechnology, Korea University)
Ki, Kwang-Seok (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A)
Jung, Ha-Yeon (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A)
Kang, Hee-Seol (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A)
Park, Seong-Min (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Environmental Science / v.21, no.2, 2015 , pp. 65-70 More about this Journal
Abstract
Total three hundred and fourteen dairy cows were used in this study to analysis of correlation between milking levels and automatic milking system (AMS). Cows were divided into five groups according to their milking levels (over 50 kg/day, 49~40 kg/day, 39~30 kg/day, 29~20 kg/day, 19~10 kg/day). All groups were compared with daily milking number, rejected number by AMS, residence time at AMS, milking time, flow rate of milk. Daily milking number and milking time were higher in the group of over 50 kg and 49~40 kg than that of other groups (p<0.05). There are no correlation on rejected number by AMS, residence time at AMS and flow rate of milk between milking levels and AMS. In addition, we found that the milk yield affected to feed intake and rumination of dairy cows. In conclusion, present results indicated that installation of AMS on dairy farms with high milk producing cows might be affected positively.
Keywords
Automatic milking system; Milk yield; Milking number; Rejected number;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Svennersten-Sjaunja, K.M, Berglund, I., Pettersson, G., 2000. The milking process in an automated milking system, evaluation of milk yield, teat condition and udder health. in: robotic milking: proceedings of the international symposium held in lelystad, Netherlands, Wageningen, 277-288.
2 Svennersten-Sjaunja K.M., Pettersson, G., 2007. Pro and cons of automatic milking in Europe. J. Animl. Sci. 2008. 86, 37-46.
3 Ahn, B.S., Jeon, B.S., Back, K.S., Park, S.J., Lee, H.J., Lee, W.S., Kim, B.S., Park, S.B., Kim, H.S., Ju, J.C., Khan, M.A., 2005. The effects of variation factors on milk yield and variation in milk yield between milking, milk components milking duration, and milking flow rate in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci & Technol. 47, 919-924.   DOI
4 Ahn, B.S., Ju, J.C., Jeon, B.S., Back, K.S., Park, S.B., 2006. Genetic parameters for milking duration, milk flow and milk yield per milking in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci & Technol. 48, 487-492.   DOI
5 ARC. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Common wealth Agricultural Bureaux. Slough. England. UK.
6 Balch, C.C., 1958. The observation of the act of eating in cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 12, 3330-3345.
7 Berglund, I., Pettersson, G., Svennersten- Sjaunja, K., 2002. Automatic milking: Effects on somatic cell count and teat end quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78, 115-124.   DOI
8 Cho, K.H., Choi, J.P., Byung, W.Y., Lee, D.H., Kong, H.S., Park, J.D., Lee, H.K., 2009. Analysis of dairy milking flow in Holstein cow using the lactocorder. J. Anim. Sci & Technol. 51, 265-272.   DOI
9 de Koning, K., Slaghuis, B., van der Vorst, Y., 2003. Robotic milking and milk quality: Effects on bacterial counts, somatic cell counts, freezing points and free fatty acids. Ital. J. Animl. Sci. 2, 291-299.   DOI
10 Hagen, K., Langbein, J., Schmied, C., Lexer, D., Waiblinger, S. 2005. Heart rate variability in dairy cows-Influences of breed and milking system. Physiol. Behave. 85, 195-204.   DOI
11 Han, H.Y., 1994. Record analysis for mastitis control. 1994. Korean J. Vat. Res, 30. 592-615.
12 Nam, I.S., Heo, B.M., Park, H.K., Min, T.H., Son, Y.S., Park, S.M., Kwon, E.G., Chang, K.M., 2014. Effect of types of milking instrument and season on milk composition in Holstein-fiesian lactating cows. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 20, 97-104.
13 Ki, K.S., Jeong, Y.H., Park, S.J., Kim, S.B., Lee, W.S., Lee, H.J., Lim, D.H., Kim, H.S., Kwon, E.G., Cho, M.Y., Jeo, J.M., 2011. Comparison of milk yield and milk composition between before and after auto milking system (AMS) use in dairy cow. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 17, 189-196.
14 Melin, M., Wiktorsson, H., Norell, L., 2005. Analysis of feeding and drinking patterns of dairy cows in two cow traffic situations in automatic milking system. J. Dairy. Sci. 88, 71-85.   DOI
15 Moon, J.Y., Chang, K.M., Nam, I.S., Park, S.M., Oh, N.S., Son, Y.S., 2014. Effects of automatic milking systems on raw milk quality and milk fat properties with or without feeding protected fat. Korean J. Dairy Sci. Technol. 32, 63-70.
16 Nam, I.S., Kim, H.S., Seo, K.M., Ahn, J.H., 2014. Analysis of HACCP system implementation on productivity, advantage and disadvantage of laying hen in Korea. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 41, 93-98.   DOI
17 Rasmussen, M.D., Blom, J.Y., H Nielsen, L.A., Justesen, P., 2001. Udder health of cows milked automatically. Livest. Prod. Sci. 72, 147-156.   DOI
18 Pearce, G.R., 1965. Rumination in sheep: The investigation of some possible control mechanisms. Aust. J. Agri. Res. 16. 837-856.   DOI
19 SAS. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Statistics, Version 8.0 Edition. SAS Instute. Inc. Cary, NC.
20 Stewart, S., Godden, S., Rapnicki, P., Reid, D., Joihnson, A., Eicker. S., 2002. Effects of automatic cluster remover settings on average milking duration, milk flow, and milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 85. 818-823.   DOI