Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11109/JAES.2014.20.1.27

Status of Anaerobic Digestion Facility for Pig-slurry in Korea  

Jeong, Kwang-Hwa (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.)
Kim, Jung-Gon (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.)
Han, Duk-Woo (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.)
Kwag, Jung-Hun (National Institute of Animal Science, R.D.A.)
Publication Information
Journal of Animal Environmental Science / v.20, no.1, 2014 , pp. 27-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to survey and inspect the currently operating anaerobic digestion facilities for animal manure. Recently, the number of anaerobic digestion facility for livestock manure is on the rise thanks to growing interest in developing alternative energy. A anaerobic digestion system has been constructed in large scale farms or animal manure public resource center. Currently, most animal manure anaerobic digestion facilities in operation are producing biogas from the pig slurry which contains 97% water. Methane gas can be used to operate a engine generator which then produces electricity. Anaerobic digestate, a by-product of digestion, is mostly utilized as a liquid fertilizer after curing processing. Only in a few cases, it can be discharged after wastewater treatment process. The problem of anaerobic digestate treatment is the imbalance of C/N ratio. The content of N was too high to keep it into normal process.
Keywords
Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Livestock manure; Treatment facility;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, H.C., Yeo, J.K., Koo, Y.B., Shin, H., Choi, J.Y., Lee, H.H., 2011. Growth and Biomass Production of Fast Growing Tree Species Treated with Slurry Composting and Biofiltration Liquid Fertilizer. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44, No. 2, 206-214.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bonmati A., X. Flotats, L. Mateu and E. Campos. 2001. Study of thermal hydrolysis as a pretreatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion of pig slurry. Water Sci. Technol. 44:109-116.
3 van Lier J.B., A. Tilche, B.K. Ahring, H. Macarie, R. Moletta, M. Dohanyo, L.W. Hulshoff Pol, P. Lens and W. Werstraete. 2001. New perspectives in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Techno. 43:1-18.
4 Nam Hyo Heo, Soon Chul Park, Jin Suk Lee, Joon Pyo Lee, Ho Kang. "Removal and Recovery of High Strength Ammonia- Nitrogen from Dewatering of Anaerobic Digested Sludge using Ammonia Stripping". Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineering, 23(4), pp. 601-612. (2001).   과학기술학회마을
5 Kim, S.H and Ju, H., "Feasibility of Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge, Swine Waste, and Food Waste Leachate". Journal of the Korea organic resources recycling association, 20(1), pp. 61-70. (2012).
6 Park, W.K., Park, N.B., Shin, J.D, Hong, S.G., Kwon, S.I. and, Kang, K.K., "Study on Characteristics of Biogas Production and Liquid Fertilizer with Anaerobic Co digestion of Livestock Manure and Food". Korean Journal of soil science and fertilizer, 44(5), pp. 895-902. (2011).   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2013. Outcome of animal waste generation and recycling('06-'12).
8 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2013. Middle & Long-term plan for recycling of livestock manure.
9 Jeong, K.H., Modabber Ahmed Khan, Choi, D.Y., Lee, D,H., "Efficiency of methane production from pig manure slurry using anaerobic digestor combined with compost filtration bed". Journal of the Korea organic resources recycling association, 20(1), pp. 51-59. (2013).
10 Kim, H.Y., Gwak, K.S., Kim H.Y., Ryu, K.O., Kim, P.G., Cho, D.H., Choi, J.Y., Clemens, J., M. Trimborn, P. Weiland and B. Amon. 2006. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 112: 171-177.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Alburquerque J.A., C. Fuente, de la., Campoy, M., Carrasco, L., Najera, I., Baixauli C., Caravaca F., Roldan A., Cegarra J., Bernal M.P., 2012. Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties. European Journal of Agronomy. 43, 119-128.   DOI   ScienceOn