Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e59

Metabolomics Analysis of the Beef Samples with Different Meat Qualities and Tastes  

Jeong, Jin Young (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Kim, Minseok (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Ji, Sang-Yun (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Baek, Youl-Chang (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Lee, Seul (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Oh, Young Kyun (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Reddy, Kondreddy Eswar (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Seo, Hyun-Woo (Animal Products Utilization Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Cho, Soohyun (Animal Products Utilization Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Lee, Hyun-Jeong (Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.40, no.6, 2020 , pp. 924-937 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the meat metabolite profiles related to differences in beef quality attributes (i.e., high-marbled and low-marbled groups) using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The beef of different marbling scores showed significant differences in water content and fat content. High-marbled meat had mainly higher taste compounds than low-marbled meat. Metabolite analysis showed differences between two marbling groups based on partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Metabolites identified by PLS-DA, such as N,N-dimethylglycine, creatine, lactate, carnosine, carnitine, sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, betaine, glycine, glucose, alanine, tryptophan, methionine, taurine, tyrosine, could be directly linked to marbling groups. Metabolites from variable importance in projection plots were identified and estimated high sensitivity as candidate markers for beef quality attributes. These potential markers were involved in beef taste-related pathways including carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. Among these metabolites, carnosine, creatine, glucose, and lactate had significantly higher in high-marbled meat compared to low-marbled meat (p<0.05). Therefore, these results will provide an important understanding of the roles of taste-related metabolites in beef quality attributes. Our findings suggest that metabolomics analysis of taste compounds and meat quality may be a powerful method for the discovery of novel biomarkers underlying the quality of beef products.
Keywords
beef; metabolomics; taste; quality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kosmides AK, Kamisoglu K, Calvano SE, Corbett SA, Androulakis IP. 2013. Metabolomic fingerprinting: Challenges and opportunities. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 41:205-221.   DOI
2 Kurihara K. 2015. Umami the fifth basic taste: History of studies on receptor mechanisms and role as a food flavor. Biomed Res Int 2015:189402.   DOI
3 Laakkonen E, Wellington GH, Skerbon JN. 1970. Low temperature long-time heating of bovine muscle 1. Changes in tenderness, water binding capacity, pH and amount of water-soluble components. J Food Sci 35:175-177.   DOI
4 Lana A, Longo V, Dalmasso A, D'Alessandro A, Bottero MT, Zolla L. 2015. Omics integrating physical techniques: Aged piedmontese meat analysis. Food Chem 172:731-741.   DOI
5 Listrat A, Lebret B, Louveau I, Astruc T, Bonnet M, Lefaucheur L, Picard B, Bugeon J. 2016. How muscle structure and composition influence meat and flesh quality. Sci World J 2016:3182746.
6 Luan H, Liu LF, Tang Z, Zhang M, Chua KK, Song JX, Mok VC, Li M, Cai Z. 2015. Comprehensive urinary metabolomic profiling and identification of potential noninvasive marker for idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Sci Rep 5:13888.   DOI
7 AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
8 Bachmanov AA, Bosak NP, Glendinning JI, Inoue M, Li X, Manita S, McCaughey SA, Murata Y, Reed DR, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. 2016. Genetics of amino acid taste and appetite. Adv Nutr 7:806S-822S.   DOI
9 Bartel J, Krumsiek J, Theis FJ. 2013. Statistical methods for the analysis of high-throughput metabolomics data. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 4:e201301009.   DOI
10 Silva DR, de Moura AP, Ramos AL, Ramos EM. 2017. Comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force values between round and square cross-section cores for assessment of beef Longissimus tenderness. Meat Sci 125:102-105.   DOI
11 Spurvey S, Pan BS, Shahidi F. 1998. Flavour of shellfish. In Flavor of meat, meat products, and seafoods. 2nd ed. Shahidi F (ed). Springer Nature, London, UK. pp 159-196.
12 Sugimoto M, Obiya S, Kaneko M, Enomoto A, Honma M, Wakayama M, Soga T, Tomita M. 2017. Metabolomic profiling as a possible reverse engineering tool for estimating processing conditions of dry-cured hams. J Agric Food Chem 65:402-410.   DOI
13 Zou Y, Kang D, Liu R, Qi J, Zhou G, Zhang W. 2018. Effects of ultrasonic assisted cooking on the chemical profiles of taste and flavor of spiced beef. Ultrason Sonochem 46:36-45.   DOI
14 Jiang T, Bratcher CL. 2016. Differentiation of commercial ground beef products and correlation between metabolites and sensory attributes: A metabolomic approach. Food Res Int 90:298-306.   DOI
15 Binnie MA, Barlow K, Johnson V, Harrison C. 2014. Red meats: Time for a paradigm shift in dietary advice. Meat Sci 98:445-451.   DOI
16 Bu J, Dai Z, Zhou T, Lu Y, Jiang Q. 2013. Chemical composition and flavour characteristics of a liquid extract occurring as waste in crab (Ovalipes punctatus) processing. J Sci Food Agric 93:2267-2275.   DOI
17 Cambero MI, Seuss I, Honikel KO. 1992. Flavor compounds of beef broth as affected by cooking temperature. J Food Sci 57:1285-1290.   DOI
18 Ma X, Chi YH, Niu M, Zhu Y, Zhao YL, Chen Z, Wang JB, Zhang CE, Li JY, Wang LF, Gong M, Wei SZ, Chen C, Zhang L, Wu MQ, Xiao XH. 2016. Metabolomics coupled with multivariate data and pathway analysis on potential biomarkers in cholestasis and intervention effect of Paeonia lactiflora Pall. Front Pharmacol 7:14.
19 Malaquias LFB, Sa-Barreto LCL, Freire DO, Silva ICR, Karan K, Durig T, Lima EM, Marreto RN, Gelfuso GM, Gratieri T, Cunha-Filho M. 2018. Taste masking and rheology improvement of drug complexed with beta-cyclodextrin and hydroxypropyl-${\beta}$-cyclodextrin by hot-melt extrusion. Carbohydr Polym 185:19-26.   DOI
20 Steinfeld H. 2003. Economic constraints on production and consumption of animal source foods for nutrition in developing countries. J Nutr 133:4054S-4061S.   DOI
21 Susumu M, Shuji U, Tomohiko K, Takuya M, Per Ertbjerg. 2020. MEATabolomics: Muscle and meat metabolomics in domestic animals. Metabolites 10:E188.
22 Tan B, Yin Y, Liu Z, Li X, Xu H, Kong X, Huang R, Tang W, Shinzato I, Smith SB, Wu G. 2009. Dietary L-arginine supplementation increases muscle gain and reduces body fat mass in growing-finishing pigs. Amino Acids 37:169-175.   DOI
23 Tian H, Zheng N, Wang W, Cheng J, Li S, Zhang Y, Wang J. 2016. Integrated metabolomics study of the milk of heat-stressed lactating dairy cows. Sci Rep 6:24208.   DOI
24 Tikk M, Tikk K, Torngren MA, Meinert L, Aaslyng MD, Karlsson AH, Andersen HJ. 2006. Development of inosine monophosphate and its degradation products during aging of pork of different qualities in relation to basic taste and retronasal flavor perception of the meat. J Agric Food Chem 54:7769-7777.   DOI
25 Nissen PM, Young JF. 2006. Creatine monohydrate and glucose supplementation to slow- and fast-growing chickens changes the postmortem pH in pectoralis major. Poult Sci 85:1038-1044.   DOI
26 Meale SJ, Morgavi DP, Cassar-Malek I, Andueza D, Ortigues-Marty I, Robins RJ, Schiphorst AM, Migne C, Petera M, Laverroux S, Graulet B, Boudra H, Cantalapiedra-Hijar G. 2017. Exploration of biological markers of feed efficiency in young bulls. J Agric Food Chem 65:9817-9827.   DOI
27 Mouritsen OG, Khandelia H. 2012. Molecular mechanism of the allosteric enhancement of the umami taste sensation. FEBS J 279:3112-3120.   DOI
28 Nian Y, Allen P, Harrison SM, Kerry JP. 2018. Effect of castration and carcass suspension method on the quality and fatty acid profile of beef from male dairy cattle. J Sci Food Agric 98:4339-4350.   DOI
29 Pal Choudhuri S, Delay RJ, Delay ER. 2015. L-Amino acids elicit diverse response patterns in taste sensory cells: A role for multiple receptors. PLOS ONE 10:e0130088.   DOI
30 Picard B, Lebret B, Cassar-Malek I, Liaubet L, Berri C, Le Bihan-Duval E, Hocquette JF, Renand G. 2015. Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management. Meat Sci 109:18-26.   DOI
31 Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. 2007. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev 26:51-78.   DOI
32 Carrillo JA, He Y, Li Y, Liu J, Erdman RA, Sonstegard TS, Song J. 2016. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptome analyses reveal finishing forage affects metabolic pathways related to beef quality and animal welfare. Sci Rep 6:25948.   DOI
33 Coulter AD, Godden PW, Pretorius IS. 2004. Succinic acid - How it is formed, what is its effect on titratable acidity, and what factors influence its concentration in wine? Wine Ind J 19:16-25.
34 den Hertog-Meischke MJ, van Laack RJ, Smulders FJ. 1997. The water-holding capacity of fresh meat. Vet Q 19:175-181.   DOI
35 Gomez I, Beriain MJ, Sarries MV, Insausti K, Mendizabal JA. 2014. Low-fat beef patties with augmented omega-3 fatty acid and CLA levels and influence of grape seed extract. J Food Sci 79:S2368-S2376.   DOI
36 Jeremiah LE, Phillips DM. 2000. Evaluation of a probe for predicting beef tenderness. Meat Sci 55:493-502.   DOI
37 Tizioto PC, Taylor JF, Decker JE, Gromboni CF, Mudadu MA, Schnabel RD, Coutinho LL, Mourao GB, Oliveira PS, Souza MM, Reecy JM, Nassu RT, Bressani FA, Tholon P, Sonstegard TS, Alencar MM, Tullio RR, Nogueira AR, Regitano LC. 2015. Detection of quantitative trait loci for mineral content of Nelore longissimus dorsi muscle. Genet Sel Evol 47:15.   DOI
38 Hernandes MS, de Magalhaes L, Troncone LR. 2007. Glycine stimulates the release of labeled acetylcholine but not dopamine nor glutamate from superfused rat striatal tissue. Brain Res 1168:32-37.   DOI
39 Ishihara Y, Moreira R, de Souza G, Salviano A, Madruga M. 2013. Study of the Warner-Bratzler shear force, sensory analysis and sarcomere length as indicators of the tenderness of sun-dried beef. Molecules 18:9432-9440.   DOI
40 Ito K, Koyama Y, Hanya Y. 2013. Identification of the glutaminase genes of Aspergillus sojae involved in glutamate production during soy sauce fermentation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77:1832-1840.   DOI
41 Williams MD, Zhang X, Park JJ, Siems WF, Gang DR, Resar LM, Reeves R, Hill HH Jr. 2015. Characterizing metabolic changes in human colorectal cancer. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:4581-4595.   DOI
42 Picard B, Lefèvre F, Lebret B. 2012. Meat and fish flesh quality improvement with proteomic applications. Anim Front 2:18-25.   DOI
43 Rotola-Pukkila MK, Pihlajaviita ST, Kaimainen MT, Hopia AI. 2015. Concentration of umami compounds in pork meat and cooking juice with different cooking times and temperatures. J Food Sci 80:C2711-C2716.   DOI
44 Rubico SM, McDaniel MR. 1992. Sensory evaluation of acids by free-choice profiling. Chem Senses 17:273-289.   DOI
45 Ueda Y, Watanabe A, Higuchi M, Shingu H, Kushibiki S, Shinoda M. 2007. Effects of intramuscular fat deposition on the beef traits of Japanese Black steers (Wagyu). Anim Sci J 78:189-194.   DOI
46 Wei Z, Xi J, Gao S, You X, Li N, Cao Y, Wang L, Luan Y, Dong X. 2018. Metabolomics coupled with pathway analysis characterizes metabolic changes in response to BDE-3 induced reproductive toxicity in mice. Sci Rep 8:5423.   DOI
47 Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R. 2000. Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 80:1107-1213.   DOI
48 Yamaguchi S, Ninomiya K. 2000. Umami and food palatability. J Nutr 130:921S-926S.   DOI
49 Yang C, Hu Z, Lu M, Li P, Tan J, Chen M, Lv H, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Guo L, Peng Q, Dai W, Lin Z. 2018. Application of metabolomics profiling in the analysis of metabolites and taste quality in different subtypes of white tea. Food Res Int 106:909-919.   DOI
50 Yang Y, Zheng N, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Han R, Yang J, Zhao S, Li S, Guo T, Zang C, Wang J. 2016. Metabolomic biomarkers identify differences in milk produced by Holstein cows and other minor dairy animals. J Proteomics 136:174-182.   DOI
51 Seo HW, Kang GH, Cho SH, Ba HV, Seong PN. 2015. Quality properties of sausages made with replacement of pork with corn starch, chicken breast and surimi during refrigerated storage. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 35:638-645.   DOI
52 Sager M, Lucke A, Ghareeb K, Allymehr M, Zebeli Q, Bohm J. 2018. Dietary deoxynivalenol does not affect mineral element accumulation in breast and thigh muscles of broiler chicken. Mycotoxin Res 34:117-121.   DOI
53 Schmidt JA, Rinaldi S, Scalbert A, Ferrari P, Achaintre D, Gunter MJ, Appleby PN, Key TJ, Travis RC. 2016. Plasma concentrations and intakes of amino acids in male meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans: A cross-sectional analysis in the EPIC-Oxford cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr 70:306-312.   DOI
54 Segers JR, Loor JJ, Moisa SJ, Gonzalez D, Shike DW. 2017. Effects of protein and fat concentration in coproduct-based growing calf diets on adipogenic and lipogenic gene expression, blood metabolites, and carcass composition. J Anim Sci 95:2767-2781.   DOI
55 Seong PN, Park KM, Kang GH, Cho SH, Park BY, Chae HS, Van Ba H. 2016. The differences in chemical composition, physical quality traits and nutritional values of horse meat as affected by various retail cut types. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 29:89-99.   DOI
56 Zang X, Jones CM, Long TQ, Monge ME, Zhou M, Walker LD, Mezencev R, Gray A, McDonald JF, Fernandez FM. 2014. Feasibility of detecting prostate cancer by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry serum metabolomics. J Proteome Res 13:3444-3454.   DOI
57 Jung EY, Hwang YH, Joo ST. 2016. The relationship between chemical compositions, meat quality, and palatability of the 10 primal cuts from Hanwoo steer. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 36:145-151.   DOI
58 Kennedy AD, Pappan KL, Donti TR, Evans AM, Wulff JE, Miller LAD, Reid Sutton V, Sun Q, Miller MJ, Elsea SH. 2017. Elucidation of the complex metabolic profile of cerebrospinal fluid using an untargeted biochemical profiling assay. Mol Genet Metab 121:83-90.   DOI
59 Kodani Y, Miyakawa T, Komatsu T, Tanokura M. 2017. NMR-based metabolomics for simultaneously evaluating multiple determinants of primary beef quality in Japanese Black cattle. Sci Rep 7:1297.   DOI