Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e26

Physicochemical Quality Properties of Loin and Tenderloin Ham from Sows  

Kim, Gye-Woong (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
Kim, Hack-Youn (Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.40, no.3, 2020 , pp. 474-483 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the physicochemical properties of hams obtained from loin and tenderloin cuts from standard pigs and sows. pH levels of loin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). The lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) values of loin ham from standard pigs were significantly higher than those of sow loin ham (p<0.001). The water-holding capacity (WHC) and curing yield of sow loin was significantly higher than standard loin (p<0.01). The cooking loss of standard pig loin ham was significantly higher than that of sow loin ham (p<0.01). Differences in sensory quality evaluation, except in the case of tenderness, for the two loin hams were not significant. pH levels of tenderloin ham before cooking, standard pig was significantly lower than that of sow (p<0.001). Redness (a*) values of before and after cooking tenderloin ham of sow was higher than that of standard pig (p<0.001). L* values of tenderloin ham of standard pig was significantly higher than that of sow (p<0.001). WHC and curing yield of tenderloin ham from sow was significantly higher than that from a standard pig (p<0.001, p<0.05). The cooking losses of sow and standard pig tenderloin ham were 26.06% and 28.31%, respectively (p<0.001). Differences in sensory quality evaluation, except in the case of tenderness and color, for the two tenderloin hams were not significant. In conclusion, sow pigs loin and tenderloin is suitable for ham product more than standard pigs loin and tenderloin.
Keywords
loin ham; physicochemical properties; sow; tenderloin ham;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Morin LA, Temelli F, McMullen L. 2002. Physical and sensory characteristics of reduced-fat breakfast sausages formulated with barely ${\beta}$-glucan. J Food Sci 67:2391-2396.   DOI
2 Norman JL, Berg EP, Heymann H, Lorenzen CL. 2003. Pork loin color relative to sensory and instrumental tenderness and consumer acceptance. Meat Sci 65:927-933.   DOI
3 Offer G. 1991. Modeling of the formation pale, soft and exudative meat: Effects of chilling regime and rate and extent of glycolysis. Meat Sci 30:157-184.   DOI
4 Offer G, Trinick J. 1983. On the mechanism of water holding in meat: The swelling and shrinking of myofibrils. Meat Sci 8:245-281.   DOI
5 Park KK, Park HY, Jung YC, Lee ES, Yang SY, Im BS, Kim CJ. 2005. Effects of fermented food waste feeds on pork carcass and meat quality properties. Korean J Food Sci Technol 37:38-43.
6 Park MJ, Ha DM, Shin HW, Lee SH, Kim WK, Ha SH, Yang HS, Jeong JY, Joo ST, Lee CY. 2007. Growth efficiency, carcass quality characteristics and profitability of 'High'-market weight pigs. J Anim Sci Technol 49:459-470.   DOI
7 Gillett TA, Cassidy RD, Simon S. 1981. Effect of continuous massaging on bind, yield, and color of hams. J Food Sci 46:1681-1683.   DOI
8 Virgili R, Degni M, Schivazappa C, Faeti V, Poletti E, Marchetto G, Pacchioli MT, Mordenti A. 2003. Effect of age at slaughter on carcass traits and meat quality of Italian heavy pigs. J Anim Sci 81:2448-2456.   DOI
9 Grau R, Hamm R. 1953. Eine einfache methode zur bestimmung der wasserbindung in muskel. Naturwissenschaften 40:29-30.   DOI
10 Stetzer AJ, Mckeith FK. 2003. Benchmakking value in the pork supply chain: Quantitative strategies and opportunities to improve quality phase 1. American Meat Science Association, Savoy, IL, USA.
11 Wiklund E, Malmfors G, Lundstrom K. 1998. The effects of exercise on muscle fiber composition and oxidative capacity in eight bovine skeletal muscles. Swed J Agric Res 28:111-116.
12 Zhu LG, Brewer MS. 1998. Discoloration of fresh pork as related to muscle and display conditions. J Food Sci 63:763-767.   DOI
13 Jin SK, Kim IS, Hur SJ, Kim SJ, Jeong KJ. 2006. The influence of pig breeds on qualities of loin. J Anim Sci Technol 48:747-758.   DOI
14 Rhim TJ, Chung KY, Kim CJ. 1995. Composition and traits of carcass and tenderness of pork from barrows of different chronological ages. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 15:117-121.
15 Seo YS. 1982. Effects of breeds and ages on the carcass composition and meat quality of cows. Korean J Anim Sci 24:488-492.
16 Seong PN, Cho SH, Kim JH, Han KH, Park BY, Kim DH, Lee JM, Ahn CN. 2008. Quality attributes of cooked pork hams manufactured with major hind leg muscles and longissimus dorsi. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 28:160-164.   DOI
17 Harris PV, Shorthose WR. 1988. Meat texture. In R. Lawrie (ed). Developments in meat science. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK. pp 245-290.
18 Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. 2005. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci 71:194-204.   DOI
19 Joo ST, Kauffman RG, Kim BC, Kim CJ. 1995. The relationship between color and water-holding capacity in postrigor porcine longissimus muscle. J Muscle Food 6:211-226.   DOI
20 Kauffman RG, Carpenter ZL, Bray RW, Hoekstra WG. 1964. Meat tenderness factors, interrelations of tenderness, chronological age, connective tissue fractions of porcine musculature. J Agric Food Chem 12:504-507.   DOI
21 Kauffman RG, Cassens RG, Scherer A, Meeker DL. 1992. Variation in pork quality. National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA, USA.
22 Kim GD, Jeong JY, Hur SJ, Yang HS, Jeon JT, Joo ST. 2010. The relationship between meat color (CIE L* and a*), myoglobin content, and their influence on muscle fiber characteristics and pork quality. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 30:626-633.   DOI
23 Moon YH. 2002. Effects of adding polyphosphate on the water holding capacity and palatability of boiled pork loin. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 22:130-136.
24 Boggs DL, Merkel RA. 1984. Live animal carcass evaluation and selection manual. 2nd ed. Kendal Hunt, Dubuque, IA, USA. p 187.
25 Martin AH, Sather AP, Fredeen HT, Jolly RW. 1980. Alternative market weights for swine. II. carcass composition and meat quality. J Anim Sci 50:699-705.   DOI
26 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs [MAFRA]. 2019. Supply and marketing of livestock products. In Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs statistics of 2016. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong, Korea. pp 332-333.
27 Moon SS, Mullen AM, Troy DJ, Yang HS, Joo ST, Park GB. 2003. Effect of pig slaughter weight on pork quality. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 23:315-320.
28 Brady DE. 1954. The consumer's definition of quality in proc. 7th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference. pp. 111-115.
29 Candek-Potokar M, Zlender B, Lefaucheur L, Bonneau M. 1998. Effects of age and/or weight at slaughter on longissimus dorsi muscle: Biochemical traits and sensory quality in pigs. Meat Sci 48:287-300.   DOI
30 Choi YI, Kim YT, Lee CL, Han IK. 2000. Carcass and pork quality characteristics by sex and marketing day. Korean J Anim Sci 42:933-940.
31 Cross HR, Carpenter ZL, Smith GC. 1973. Effects of intramuscular collagen and elastin on bovine muscle tenderness. J Food Sci 38:998-1003.   DOI
32 Dzudie T, Okubanjo A. 1999. Effects of rigor state and tumbling time on quality of goat hams. J Food Eng 42:103-107.   DOI
33 Fang SH, Nishimura T, Takahashi K. 1999. Relationship between development of intramuscular connective tissue and toughness of pork during growth of pigs. J Anim Sci 77:120-130.   DOI