Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e98

Effect of Partial Replacement of Soybean and Corn with Dietary Chickpea (Raw, Autoclaved, or Microwaved) on Production Performance of Laying Quails and Egg Quality  

Sengul, Ahmet Yusuf (Department of Animal Science, Bingol University Faculty of Agriculture)
Calislar, Suleyman (Department of Animal Science, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Faculty of Agriculture)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.40, no.3, 2020 , pp. 323-337 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate whether adding different levels of raw or differently processed chickpea into different diets of laying quails affected live weight, feed intake, feed efficiency, egg weight and internal and external egg quality. Chickpea was used as raw, autoclaved or microwave-processed, and it was involved in the diets on two different levels (20% and 40%). The sample was divided into 7 groups including the control, 20% and 40% raw, 20% and 40% autoclaved, and 20% and 40% microwave-processed groups. 336 ten-week-old female laying quails were used in the study, and the experiment continued for 19 weeks. In the study, the differences among the groups were insignificant in terms of live weight, feed intake, feed efficiency, egg weight and egg quality characteristics such as shell thickness, shell weight, yolk weight, yolk color and albumin index. The differences were significant in terms of the shape index, Haugh unit (p<0.05) and yolk index (p<0.01). Consequently, it was observed that different thermal processes on chickpeas did not usually have a significant effect on the yield performance of the quails, and the results that were obtained were similar to the other groups. However, it was determined that some egg quality characteristics were affected by the autoclaving and microwaving processes. Between the thermal processes, it may be stated that autoclaving provided better results.
Keywords
autoclaving; chickpea; egg characteristics; microwave process; productive performance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alajaji SA, El-Adawy TA. 2006. Nutritional composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by microwave cooking and other traditional cooking methods. J Food Compos Anal 19:806-812.   DOI
2 Algam TA, Atti KAA, Dousa BM, Elawad SM, Elseed AMF. 2012. Effect of dietary raw chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds on broiler performance and blood constituents. Int J Poult Sci 11:294-297.   DOI
3 Anderson KE, Tharrington JB, Curtis PA, Jones FT. 2004. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of Single Comb White Leghorn chickens and the relationship of egg shape to shell strength. Int J Poult Sci 3:17-19.   DOI
4 AOAC. 2005. Methods of analysis. 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
5 Bampidis VA, Christodoulou V. 2011. Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) in animal nutrition: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 168:1-20.   DOI
6 Brenes A, Viveros A, Centeno C, Arija I, Marzo F. 2008. Nutritional value of raw and extruded chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for growing chickens. Span J Agric Res 6:537-545.   DOI
7 Carpenter KJ, Clegg KM. 1956. The metabolizable energy of poultry feeding stuffs in relation to their chemical composition. J Sci Food Agric 7:45-51.   DOI
8 Christodoulou V, Bampidis VA, Hucko B, Mudrik Z. 2006a. The use of extruded chickpeas in diets of broiler turkeys. Czech J Anim Sci 51:416-423.   DOI
9 Christodoulou V, Bampidis VA, Hucko B, Iliadis C, Mudrik Z. 2006b. Nutritional value of chickpeas in rations of broiler chickens. Eur Poult Sci 70:112-118.
10 Mittal R, Nagi HPS, Sharma P, Sharma S. 2012. Effect of processing on chemical composition and antinutritional factors in chickpea flour. J Food Sci Eng 2:180-186.
11 Mudgett RE. 1989. Microwave food processing. Food Technol 43:117-126.
12 NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
13 Obregon JF, Bell C, Iliana Elenes A, Estrada A, Portillo JJ, Rios FG. 2012. Effect of discarded chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cooking on the productive response and carcass yield of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) at the fattening stage. Cuban J Agric Sci 46:169-173.
14 Rehman ZU, Shah WH. 2001. Tannin contents and protein digestibility of black grams (Vigna mungo) after soaking and cooking. Plant Food Hum Nutr 56:265-273.   DOI
15 Ciftci C.Y. 2004. Dunyada ve Turkiye'de yemeklik tane baklagiller tarimi. TMMOB Ziraat Muhendisleri Odasi Teknik Yayinlar Dizisi 5:88 (in Turkish).
16 Decareau RV, Peterson R. 1986. Microwave processing and engineering. VCH, Weinheim, Germany. pp 18-21.
17 Ozdemir F, Golukcu M, Topuz A. 2003. Some chemical, physical properties of raw peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and microwave roasting effect on fatty acid composition of peanut's. Gida Dergisi Cilt 28:39-45.
18 Perez-Maldonado RA, Mannion PF, Farrell DJ. 1999. Optimum inclusion of field peas, faba beans, chick peas and sweet lupins in poultry diets. I. Chemical composition and layer experiments. Br Poult Sci 40:667-673.   DOI
19 Reed JD. 1995. Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. J Anim Sci 73:1516-1528.   DOI
20 SAS. 2006. SAS 9.1.3 user manual. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
21 Seyhun N, Sumnu G, Sahin S. 2004. Effects of different starch and emulsifier types and fat contents on staling of microwavebaked cakes. Gida Dergisi Cilt 29:337-343.
22 Sharma HR, Nicholson WG. 1975. Effects of treating faba beans with formaldehyde or volatile fatty acids on the performance of dairy calves and fistulated sheep. Can J Anim Sci 55:705-713.   DOI
23 Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350-356.   DOI
24 Deshpande SS, Cheryan M. 1984. Preparation and antinutritional characteristics of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) protein concentrates. Plant Food Hum Nutr 34:185-196.   DOI
25 Deshpande SS, Damodaran S. 1990. Food legumes: Chemistry and technology. In Advances in cereal science and technology. Pomeranz Y (ed). American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, USA. pp 47-241.
26 Djeddi AN. 1999. The effects of vetch seed used in quail rations on egg production, egg quality and some blood parameters. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 46:9-19.
27 El-Adawy TA. 2002. Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) undergoing different cooking methods and germination. Plant Food Hum Nutr 57:83-97.   DOI
28 Ercan B, Acar J, Askin O. 1989. Microwaves, their use in food industry and effects on microorganisms. Gida Dergisi Cilt 14:141-148.
29 Ertas N, Turker S, Bilgicli N. 2008. Cesitli proseslerin baklagilin besinsel ve antibesinsel ogelerine etkisi. Proceedings of the Turkey 10th Food Congress, Erzurum, Turkey. pp 21-23.
30 Torki M, Karimi A. 2007. Evaluation of dietary replacement of soybean meal by chickpea supplemented by enzymes on performance of broiler chicks. Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Strasbourg, France. pp 651-654.
31 Gerard KA, Roberts JS. 2004. Microwave heating of apple mash to improve juice yield and quality. LWT-Food Sci Technol 37:551-557.   DOI
32 Eskibalci MF, Ozkan SG. 2008. Application of microwave energy in mineral processing and investigation of its effects on grind ability of boron minerals. Ist Earth Sci 11-23.
33 FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. 2016. Statistical database. Available from: http://www.fao.org. Accessed at Jul 30, 2019.
34 Farrell DJ, Perez-Maldonado RA, Mannion PF. 1999. Optimum inclusion of field peas, faba beans, chick peas and sweet lupins in poultry diets. II. Broiler experiments. Br Poult Sci 40:674-680.   DOI
35 Van Der Poel AFB. 1990. Effect of processing on antinutritional factors and protein nutritional value of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 29:179-208.   DOI
36 Viveros A, Brenes A, Elices R, Arija I, Canales R. 2001. Nutritional value of raw and autoclaved Kabuli and Desi chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for growing chickens. Br Poult Sci 42:242-251.   DOI
37 Abdelgadir IEO, Morrill JL, Higgins JJ. 1996. Effect of roasted soybeans and corn on performance and ruminal and blood metabolites of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 79:465-474.   DOI
38 Fru-Nji F, Niess E, Pfeffer E. 2007. Effect of graded replacement of soybean meal by faba beans (Vicia faba L.) or field peas (Pisum sativum L.) in rations for laying hens on egg production and quality. J Poult Sci 44:34-41.   DOI
39 Garsen A, Dotas D, Florou-Paneri P, Nikolakakis I. 2007. Performance and egg quality traits of layers fed diets containing increasing levels of chickpea. Anim Sci Rev 36:3-14.
40 Gatel F. 1994. Protein quality of legume seeds for non-ruminant animals: A literature review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 45:317-348.   DOI
41 Gungor A. 1998. Grindability of microwave-heated ores. MS thesis, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, Turkey.
42 Kaya I, Yalcin S. 1999. Grain legumes and usage in ruminant rations. Lalahan Hayvancilik Arast Enst Derg 39:101-114.
43 Haugh RR. 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg Poult Mag 43:572-573.
44 Huisman J, Jansman AJM. 1991. Dietary effects and some analytical aspects of antinutritional factors in peas (Pisum sativum), common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybeans (Glycine max L.) in monogastric farm animals. Nutr Abst Rev B 61:901-921.
45 Karabulut A, Canbolat O. 2005. Yem degerlendirme ve analiz yontemleri. 1st ed. Uludag Universitesi Yayinlari. Bursa, Turkey. p 520.
46 Makkar HPS, Becker K, Abel H, Szegletti C. 1995. Degradation of condensed tannins by rumen microbes exposed to quebracho tannins (QT) in rumen simulation technique (rusitec) and effects of QT on fermentative processes in the rusitec. J Sci Food Agric 69:495-500.   DOI