1 |
Ahn SI, Park JH, Kim JH, Oh DG, Kim M, Chung D, Jhoo JW, Kim GY. 2017. Optimization of manufacturing conditions for improving storage stability of coffee-supplemented milk beverage using response surface methodology. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 37:87-97.
DOI
|
2 |
Box GEP, Wilson KB. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Royal Stat Soc Series B Methodol 13:1-45.
|
3 |
DerringerG, Suich R. 1980. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214-219.
DOI
|
4 |
Giunta AA. 1997. Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization using design of experiments theory and response surface modeling methods. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
|
5 |
Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. 2009. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
|
6 |
Oh S, Rheem S, Sim J, Kim S, Baek Y. 1995. Optimizing conditions for the growth of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in tryptone-yeast extract-glucose medium by using response surface methodology. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3809-3814.
DOI
|
7 |
Rheem I, Rheem S. 2012. Response surface analysis in the presence of the lack of fit of the second-order polynomial regression model. J Korean Data Anal Soc 14:2995-3001.
|
8 |
Rheem S, Oh S. 2019. Improving the quality of response surface analysis of an experiment for coffee-supplemented milk beverage: I. Data screening at the center point and maximum possible R-square. Food Sci Anim Resour 39:114-120.
DOI
|
9 |
SAS. 2013. SAS/GRAPH User's Guide. Release 6.04, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
|
10 |
SAS. 2013. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.04, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
|