Browse > Article

Evaluation of Un-Cooked Restructured Belly and Cooked Restructured Bacon using a Protein-Emulsion Material from Pork  

허선진 (경상대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학부)
강근호 (경상대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학부)
양한술 (경상대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학부)
정진연 (경상대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학부)
박구부 (경상대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학부)
주선태 (동물생명산업지역협력연구센터)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.24, no.2, 2004 , pp. 146-150 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to develope the uncooked-restructured belly (URB) and the processed-restructured bacon (PRB) using a protein-emulsion material (PEM) from pork, and to evaluate the quality characteristics of the URB and PRB. The PEM used to adhere muscle and fat tissues was prepared with a salt-soluble protein and emulsions (ratio 9:1). In color measurements, L$\^$*/, a$\^$*/ and b$\^$*/ values were significantly (p＜0.05) higher in URB than PRB. There was no significant difference in L$\^$*/ value between PRB from fresh pork and PRB from thaw pork PRB showed significantly (p＜0.05) higher water holding capacity compared to URB. Tensil strength of PRB was also significantly (p＜0.05) higher than that of URB. However, PRB from thawed pork marked the lowest color score among restructured meats in sensory evaluation. The scores of juiciness and tenderness were significantly (p＜0.05) Higher in URB compared to PRB. Consequently URB had significantly (p.＜0.05) higher score of overall acceptability than PRB. These results suggested that URB made with PEM could have a better sensory characteristics compared to PRB. Results also suggested that the PEM would not be enough to adhere fresh muscle and fat tissues as much as PRB, even though the possibility of PEM was confirmed as a meat glue.
Keywords
restructured meat; meat glue; restructured belly;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jin, S. K. and Lee, M. H. (1988) Interactive effect of non-meat proteins and by-products substituted for pork on the quality of the restructured pork product. Korean J. Animal Sci. 30(7), 435-440
2 Trout, G. R, Chen, C. M.. and Dale, S. (1990) Effect of calcium carbonate and sodium alginate on the textural characteristics, and color stability of restructured pork chop. J. Food Sci. 55(1), 38-42   DOI
3 Choi, Y. I. and Guenther, J. J. (1988) Effect of emulsion addition on exudate proteins, binding, visual and sensory characteristics of restructured beef steaks. Korean J. Animal Sci. 30(12), 752-757
4 Pietrasik, Z. (2003) Binding and textural properties of beef gels processed with k-carrageenan, egg albumin and micro-bial transglutaminase. Meat Sci. 63, 317-324   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cordray, J. C., Huffinan, D. L., and Egbert, W. R. (1989) Restructured pork from hot processed sow meat: Effect of particle size and blend ratio. J. Food Prot. 52(8), 581-585
6 Mendenhall, V. T. (1995) Process for bonding fonned meat to bone. U. S. Patent 5,387,424
7 Miller, M. F., Davis, G. W., Seideman, S. C., Ramsey, C. R, and Rolan, T. L. (1986) Effects of various phosphates on the palatability, appearance and storage traits of flaked and formed restructured beef steaks. J. Food Sci. 51(6), 1435-1438   DOI
8 Mueller, W. D. and Chin, K. B (2003) Characterization of restructured meat products manufactured with PSE pork harns as compared to those with normal pork counterparts. Kor. J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 23(4), 321-326
9 SAS (1998) SAS/STAT Software for pc. Release 6.11, SAS Institute, Cary, NC. USA
10 Kenny, P. B., Kastner, C. L., and Kroff, D. H. (1992) Muscle washing and raw material source affect quality and physicochemical properties of low-salt, low-fat restructured beef. J. Food Sci. 57(3), 545-550   DOI