Browse > Article

Preference Choice Survey of Pork Chop by French and Korean Consumers  

Tania M. Ngapo (Station de Recherches sur la Viande, INRA Theix)
Cho, Soo-Hyun (National Livestock Research Institut)
Park, Beom-Young (National Livestock Research Institut)
Kim, Jin-Hyeong (National Livestock Research Institut)
Lee, Jong-Moon (National Livestock Research Institut)
Lee, Sung-Ki (Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Food Science of Animal Resources / v.24, no.1, 2004 , pp. 57-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
Digital photographs of 16 pork chops were each modified to give 16 treatments, such as two levels each of fat cover, color, marbling and drip, giving a total of 256 images. Consumers from three locations in France and six locations in Korea selected their preferred chop from 16 treatments in different chops and repeated this selection process eight times from different groups of chops, respectively. Respondents were asked to complete a questionnaire on socio-demographic information. Both the results of the French and Korean surveys gave four clusters of consumers, but they were not the same in terms of the choice strategies used, or in terms of their relationships with the socio-demographic items. The interesting apparent similarities (such as, both color levels being equally important to consumers in both countries) and differences(such as, the strong preference for lean meat in France; no fat preference in Korea) suggest a need to compare the results from the two countries. However, due to the difference of the socio-demographic make-up of the consumer panels from the two countries, a simple and direct comparison of the clusters based on choice and their relationships with the questionnaire items is not possible, but is currently being explored.
Keywords
consumers; preferences survey; pork choice; color; marbling;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Melton, B. E., Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., and Fox, J. A. (1996) Constuner preferences for fresh food items with multiple quality attributes: evidence from an experimental auction of pork chops. American Journal of Agricultural &onomics 78, 916-923   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Zuidam, L., Schmidt, R. G., Oosterbaan, J., and Sybesma, W. (1971) Effect of fresh pork colour on constuner acceptance. Proceed. 2nd Int. Symp. Condo Meat Qual. Pigs Wageningen, pp. 282-286
3 O'Mahony, R, Cowan, C., and Keane, M. (1991) Constuner preferences for pork chops with different levels of intramuscular fat. Food Quality and Prqerence 3, 229-234   DOI   ScienceOn
4 SAS (1996) SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Version 6.12, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, USA
5 Becker, T., Benner, E., and Glitsch, K. (2000) Consumer perception of fresh meat quality in Germany. British Food Journal 102, 246-266   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Romans, J. R. and Norton, H. W. (1989). Constuner evaluation of fresh pork quality. Proceed. 35th Int. Cong. Meat Sci. TechnoI., Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 614-618
7 Glitsch, K. (2000) Constuner perceptions of fresh meat quality: cross-national comparison. British Food Journal 102, 177-194   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ngapo, T. M., Martin, J.-F., and Dransfield, E. (2002) Constuner preferences of pork chops: an international cross-cultural comparison. Proceed. 48th Int. Congo Meat Sci. TechnolI., Rome, Italy, pp. 150-151
9 Ngapo, T. M., Martin, J.-F., and Dransfield, E. (2004) Constuner choices of pork chops: results from three constuner panels in France. Food Quality and Preference 15, 349-359   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Ngapo, T. M, Dransfied, E., Martin, J.-F., Magnusson, M., Bredahl, L., and Nute, G. R. (2003) Constuner perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England, Sweden and Denmark. Meat Science 66, 125-134
11 Diamant, R., Watts, B. M.., and Cliplef, R L. (1976) Consumer criteria for pork related to sensory, physical and descriptive attributes. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal 9, 151-1544   DOI
12 Dransfield, E., Martin, J.-F., Miramont, J., and Ngapo, T. M. (2001) Meat Appearance: Pork Chops. A tool for surveying constuner preferences. INRA, France, ISBN 2-7380- 0976-X