Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0044

Assessment of chicken thigh meat quality of Ross 308 broiler of animal welfare certified farm  

Kim, Hee-Jin (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Shin, Dong-Jin (Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Hye-Jin (Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Cho, Jinwoo (Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Kwon, Ji-Seon (Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Dongwook (Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Jung, Jong-Hyun (Jung P&C Institute, Inc.)
Jang, Aera (Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Animal Bioscience / v.35, no.12, 2022 , pp. 1957-1966 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the difference in the thigh meat quality of Ross 308 broiler from conventional and welfare farms. Methods: Thigh meat samples of Ross 308 broilers (age, 35 d; carcass weight, 1.1 kg) from conventional farm (RCF, n = 60) and animal welfare farms (RAWF, n = 60) were analyzed. Proximate composition, pH, color (lightness, redness, and yellowness), water-holding capacity (WHC), shear force, total aerobic bacteria (TAB), and volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) were measured and the levels of bioactive compounds such as dipeptides (anserine and carnosine), creatine, creatinine, and their anti-oxidation activity were determined. Results: The RCF and RAWF did not differ significantly in their proximate composition, WHC, color, and creatine and carnosine levels. The pH value was significantly lower in RAWF than in RCF on day 7. The shear force value was significantly higher in RAWF than in RCF throughout the storage duration. TAB in RCF on day 9 were significantly higher than those in RAWF. The VBN content of RAWF was significantly lower than that of RCF after 5 days of storage. Creatinine content was significantly higher in RAWF (3.50 mg/100 g) than in RCF (3.08 mg/100 g) on day 1. Along with higher carnosine and anserine contents of RAWF, it had significantly higher 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl and 2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical scavenging activities than those of RCF. Conclusion: These results imply that the animal welfare farming system beneficially affects the overall oxidative stability of Ross 308 thigh meat.
Keywords
Chicken; Dipeptides; Meat Quality; Ross 308; Welfare;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 da Silva DCF, de Arruda AMV, Goncalves AA. Quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat from free-range and industrial poultry system for the consumers. J Food Sci Technol 2017; 54:1818-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2612-x   DOI
2 Jung S, Bae YS, Kim HJ, et al. Carnosine, anserine, creatine, and inosine 5'-monophosphate contents in breast and thigh meats from 5 lines of Korean native chicken. Poult Sci 2013; 92:3275-82. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03441   DOI
3 Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) 20211 [cited 2022 Jan 19]. Available from: https://foodsafetykorea.go.kr/foodcode/03_02.jsp?idx=37
4 Adhihetty PJ, Beal MF. Creatine and its potential therapeutic value for targeting cellular energy impairment in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuromolecular Med 2008;10:275-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12017-008-8053-y   DOI
5 Kashani K, Rosner MH, Ostermann M. Creatinine: from physiology to clinical application. Eur J Intern Med 2020;72: 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2019.10.025   DOI
6 Lee HJ, Jayasena DD, Kim SH, et al. Comparison of bioactive compounds and quality traits of breast meat from Korean native ducks and commercial ducks. Food Sci Anim Resour 2015;35:114-20. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.1.114   DOI
7 Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000109889
8 Boldyrev AA, Severin SE. The histidine-containing dipeptides, carnosine and anserine: distribution, properties and biological significance. Adv Enzyme Regul 1990;30:175-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0065-2571(90)90017-V   DOI
9 Lee SY, Ali M, Park JY, Jung JH, Jang A, Nam KC. Meat quality characteristics of pigs from animal welfare certified farm. Ann Anim Resour Sci 2020;31:32-44. https://doi.org/10.12718/AARS.2020.31.1.32   DOI
10 Chan KM, Decker EA. Endogenous skeletal muscle antioxidants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1994;34:403-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399409527669   DOI
11 Kim HJ, Jang A. Correlations between the levels of the bioactive compounds and quality traits in beef loin and round during cold storage. Food Conrol 2021;120:107491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107491   DOI
12 Sun T, Long RJ, Liu ZY. The effect of a diet containing grasshoppers and access to free-range on carcass and meat physicochemical and sensory characteristics in broilers. Br Poult Sci 2013;54:130-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.756575   DOI
13 Goo D, Kim JH, Choi HS, Park GH, Han GP, Kil DY. Effect of stocking density and sex on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019;98:1153-60. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey491   DOI
14 Hulankova R, Borilova G, Abdullah FAA, Buchtova H. Microbiological quality of organic chicken meat during refrigerated storage in air and modified atmospheres. Br Poult Sci 2018;59: 506-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1496399   DOI
15 Castellini C, Mugnai CAND, Dal Bosco A. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci 2002;60:219-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00124-3   DOI
16 Lee D, Lee HJ, Jung DY, Kim HJ, Jang A, Jo C. Effect of an animal-friendly raising environment on the quality, storage stability, and metabolomic profiles of chicken thigh meat. Food Res Int 2022;155:111046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111046   DOI
17 Kim HJ, Kim D, Kim HJ, Kwon JS, Jang A. Physicochemical characteristics and bioactive compounds of thigh meat from Cobb broiler in animal welfare farm. Food Life 2021;2021: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.5851/fl.2021.e7   DOI
18 Notification of regulations No. 2016-100, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency of Korea; 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 06]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW//admRulInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000136809&chrClsCd=010201#
19 Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Jeon JJ, et al. Comparison of quality and bioactive compounds in chicken thigh meat from Conventional and animal welfare farm in Korea. Korean J Poult Sci 2018;45:261-72. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.4.261   DOI
20 Blois MS. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 1958;181:1199-200. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0   DOI
21 Bianchi M, Petracci M, Cavani C. The influence of genotype, market live weight, transportation, and holding conditions prior to slaughter on broiler breast meat color. Poult Sci 2006; 85:123-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.1.123   DOI
22 Sahoo K, Sahoo B, Choudhury AK, Sofi NY, Kumar R, Bhadoria AS. Childhood obesity: causes and consequences. J Family Med Prim Care 2015;4:187-92. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.154628   DOI
23 Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Faucitano L, Dadgar S, Shand P, Gonzalez LA, Crowe TG. Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci 2012;92: 227-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010   DOI
24 Souza APO, Molento CFM. The contribution of broiler chicken welfare certification at farm level to enhancing overall animal welfare: The case of Brazil. J Agric Environ Ethics 2015;28:1033-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9576-5   DOI
25 Skaperda Z, Veskoukis AS, Kouretas D. Farm animal welfare, productivity and meat quality: Interrelation with redox status regulation and antioxidant supplementation as a nutritional intervention. World Acad Sci J 2019;1:177-83. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2019.19   DOI
26 Gillespie KM, Chae JM, Ainsworth EA. Rapid measurement of total antioxidant capacity in plants. Nat Protoc 2007;2:867-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.100   DOI
27 Husak RL, Sebranek JG, Bregendahl K. A survey of commercially available broilers marketed as organic, free-range, and conventional broilers for cooked meat yields, meat composition, and relative value. Poult Sci 2008;87:2367-76. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00294   DOI
28 Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, RiceEvans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 1999;26:1231-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3   DOI
29 El-Deek, A, El-Sabrout, K. Behaviour and meat quality of chicken under different housing systems. Worlds Poult Sci J 2019;75:105-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000946   DOI
30 Silva CMG, Gloria MBA. Bioactive amines in chicken breast and thigh after slaughter and during storage at 4±1℃ and in chicken-based meat products. Food Chem 2002;78:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00404-6   DOI
31 Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Jeon J, et al. Comparison of the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat from conventional and animal welfare farms under refrigerated storage. Poult Sci 2020;99:1788-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.009   DOI
32 AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 16th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 1998.
33 Mora L, Sentandreu MA, Toldra F. Hydrophilic chromatographic determination of carnosine, anserine, balenine, creatine, and creatinine. J Agric Food Chem 2007;55:4664-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0703809   DOI
34 Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 1996;239:70-6. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292   DOI
35 Zhao ZG, Li JH, Li X, Bao J. Effects of housing systems on behaviour, performance and welfare of fast-growing broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:140-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13167   DOI
36 Beilken SL, Bouton PE, Harris PV. Some effects on the mechanical properties of meat produced by cooking at temperatures between 50 and 60°C. J Food Sci 1986;51:791-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13934.x   DOI
37 Sujiwo J, Kim D, Jang A. Relation among quality traits of chicken breast meat during cold storage: correlations between freshness traits and torrymeter values. Poult Sci 2018;97:2887-94. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey138   DOI
38 Berri C, Metayer-Coustard S, Lessire M, Duval E, Bouvarel I, Tesseraud S. Managing poultry meat quality by nutrition. 22th European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat; 2015 May; Nantes, France: World's Poultry Science Association; 2015. 190 p. https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02742739
39 Fanatico AC, Pillai PB, Cavitt LC, Owens CM, Emmert JL. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: growth performance and carcass yield. Poult Sci 2005;84:1321-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1321   DOI
40 Khan AW, Van den Berg L. Some protein changes during post-mortem tenderization in poultry meat. J Food Sci 1964; 29:597-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1964.tb00416.x   DOI
41 Tuell JR, Park JY, Wang W, Cheng HW, Kim YHB. Functional/ physicochemical properties and oxidative stability of ground meat from broilers reared under different photoperiods. Poult Sci 2020;99:3761-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.021   DOI
42 Fernandes RTV, Arruda AMVD, Costa MKDO, et al. Physicochemical and microbiological parameters of frozen and chilled chicken meat. Rev Bras Zootec 2016;45:417-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000700009   DOI
43 Jayasena DD, Jung S, Bae YS, et al. Changes in endogenous bioactive compounds of Korean native chicken meat at different ages and during cooking. Poult Sci 2014;93:1842-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03721   DOI
44 Bonnet C, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Requillart V, Treich N. Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy 2020;97:101847. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101847   DOI