Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0102

Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in meat meal, fish meal, and soybean meal fed to pigs  

Kong, Changsu (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University)
Kim, Kyoung Hoon (Department of International Agricultural Technology, Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University)
Ji, Sang Yun (Animal Nutritional Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Beob Gyun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Animal Bioscience / v.34, no.11, 2021 , pp. 1822-1828 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The objectives of the present study were to determine digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and standardized total tract digestibility (STTD) of phosphorus (P) in meat meal (MM) and to compare these values with those in fish meal (FM), and soybean meal (SBM) fed to pigs. Methods: Two experiments were conducted to determine energy concentrations and STTD of P in MM, FM, and SBM fed to growing pigs. In Exp. 1, DE and ME in the 3 test ingredients were measured using 24 barrows with initial body weight (BW) of 77.7±8.3 kg. A corn-based diet and 3 diets containing corn and 22% to 30% of each test ingredient were prepared. In Exp. 2, the STTD of P in the 3 test ingredients was measured using 24 barrows (90.9±6.6 kg BW). Three diets were formulated to contain each test ingredient as the sole source of P. Results: In Exp. 1, the DE and ME values in MM (3,310 and 2,856 kcal/kg dry matter [DM]) were less (p<0.05) than those in FM (4,121 and 3,572 kcal/kg DM) and SBM (4,390 and 4,032 kcal/kg DM). In Exp. 2, FM (64.3%) had greater (p<0.05) STTD of P than SBM (44.8%) with MM (55.8%) having intermediate STTD of P. Conclusion: The MM contains less energy concentrations compared with FM and SBM, and digestibility of phosphorus in MM does not differ from that in FM and SBM.
Keywords
Digestible Energy; Meat Meal; Metabolizable Energy; Phosphorus Digestibility; Swine;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sauvant D, Perez J-M, Tran G. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. 2nd ed. INRA ed., Paris, France: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.
2 NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2012.
3 Yoo JS, Cho KH, Hong JS, et al. Nutrient ileal digestibility evaluation of dried mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae compared to three animal protein by-products in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2019;32:387-94. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0647   DOI
4 Son AR, Kim BG. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in single-cell protein and fish meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:328-31. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9798   DOI
5 Sung JY, Ji SY, Kim BG. Amino acid and calcium digestibility in hatchery byproducts fed to nursery pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020;270:114703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114703   DOI
6 Liu JB, Liu ZQ, Chen L, Zhang HF. Effects of feed intake and dietary nutrient density on apparent ileal and total tract digestibility of nutrients and gross energy for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:4251-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9373   DOI
7 Kim SW, Easter RA. Nutritional value of fish meals in the diet for young pigs. J Anim Sci 2001;79:1829-39. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7971829x   DOI
8 Bax ML, Aubry L, Ferreira C, et al. Cooking temperature is a key determinant of in vitro meat protein digestion rate: investigation of underlying mechanisms. J Agric Food Chem 2012;60:2569-76. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf205280y   DOI
9 Sung JY, Ji SY, Son AR, Kim BG. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in hatchery byproducts fed to nursery pigs. Animals 2019;9:255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050255   DOI
10 Baker KM, Liu Y, Stein HH. Nutritional value of soybean meal produced from high protein, low oligosaccharide, or conventional varieties of soybeans and fed to weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;188:64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.018   DOI
11 Noblet J, Henry Y. Energy evaluation systems for pig diets: a review. Livest Prod Sci 1993;36:121-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(93)90147-A   DOI
12 Le Goff G, Noblet J. Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. J Anim Sci 2001;79:2418-27. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7992418x   DOI
13 Kim BG, Liu Y, Stein HH. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in yeast products produced from the ethanol industry, and in brewers' yeast, fish meal, and soybean meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:5476-84. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7416   DOI
14 Kim BG, Lindemann MD, Cromwell GL, Balfagon A, Agudelo JH. The correlation between passage rate of digesta and dry matter digestibility in various stages of swine. Livest Sci 2007;109:81-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.082   DOI
15 Parsons CM, Castanon F, Han Y. Protein and amino acid quality of meat and bone meal. Poult Sci 1997;76:361-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.2.361   DOI
16 Stein HH, Berger LL, Drackley JK, et al. Nutritional properties and feeding values of soybeans and their coproducts. In: Johnson LA, White PJ, Galloway R, editors, Soybeans. Chemistry, production, processing and utilization. Urbana, IL, USA: AOCS Press; 2008. p. 615-62.
17 AAFCO. 2019 Official Publication. West Lafayette, IN, USA: Association of American Feed Control Officials; 2019.
18 Kong C, Kang HG, Kim BG, Kim KH. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in meat meal and soybean meal fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:990-5. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14217   DOI
19 Navarro DMDL, Mathai JK, Jaworski NW, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility in six sources of meat and bone meal, blood meal, and soybean meal fed to growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2018;98:860-7. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0217   DOI
20 NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 1998.
21 Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:917-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02   DOI
22 AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 20th ed.; Association Office Analytical Chemists; 2016.
23 Cromwell GL, Stahly TS, Monegue HJ. Amino acid supplementation of meat meal in lysine-fortified, corn-based diets for growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 1991;69:4898-906. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69124898x   DOI
24 She Y, Li D, Zhang S. Methodological aspects of determining phosphorus digestibility in swine: a review. Anim Nutr 2017;3:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.02.003   DOI
25 Almeida FN, Stein HH. Effects of graded levels of microbial phytase on the standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus in corn and corn coproducts fed to pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:1262-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4144   DOI
26 Sung JY, Kim BG. Prediction models for apparent and standardized total tract digestible phosphorus in swine diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2019;255:114224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114224   DOI
27 Wang X, Parsons CM. Effect of raw material source, processing systems, and processing temperatures on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meals. Poult Sci 1998;77:834-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.6.834   DOI
28 Cunningham HM, Friend DW, Nicholson JWG. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Can J Anim Sci 1962;42:167-75. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas62-027   DOI
29 Huang Q, Su YB, Li DF, et al. Effects of inclusion levels of wheat bran and body weight on ileal and fecal digestibility in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:847-54. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0769   DOI
30 Oberli M, Lan A, Khodorova N, et al. Compared with raw bovine meat, boiling but not grilling, barbecuing, or roasting decreases protein digestibility without any major consequences for intestinal mucosa in rats, although the daily ingestion of bovine meat induces histologic modifications in the colon. J Nutr 2016;146:1506-13. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.230839   DOI