[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2019.24.10.225

A Study on the Judgment Criteria for the Trademark Dilution of Famous Marks

Park, Jong-Ryeol (Dept. of Police & Law, KwangJu Women's University)
Noe, Sang-Ouk (Dept. of Police & Law, Joongbu University)

Publication Information

Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information / v.24, no.10, 2019 , pp. 225-232 More about this Journal

Abstract

The trademark dilution of famous marks as a kind of unfair competition practice is defined and regulated in Article 2 (1) (c) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as the Unfair Competition Prevention Act), which was newly established according to the amendment of the Act on February 3, 2001. Famous trademarks are universally protected in all around the world, which are likewise protected in the Republic of Korea by the Unfair Competition Prevention Actin line with such international trends. In order to establish the trademark dilution of famous marks, it is necessary to have the following characteristics: (1) high reputation of the original mark, (2) use of identical or similar markscompared to the original mark, (3) occurrence of blurring of discrimination or tarnishment of reputation; in particular, with respect to the degree of proof of 'blurring of discrimination or tarnishment of reputation', which is a constituent requirement of the trademark dilution of famous marks, it is reasonable to interpret the trademark dilution as concrete endangerment offense, neither harm-based offense nor abstract endangerment offense, and thus it should be considered that the crime is established if a specific realistic risk of blurring of discrimination or tarnishment of reputation occurs. Furthermore, in relation to the specific criteria of 'blurring of discrimination or tarnishment of reputation', it is necessary to comprehensively judge the degree of individual behavior in specific matters as a normative factor as well as the psychosocial viewpoint of the general public.

Keywords

Famous marks; Trademark Dilution; The Unfair Competition Prevention Act; Blurring; Tarnishment;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Choi, Soon Yong, "The Retrospective and Prospect of Brand Dilution Theory", Tasks and Prospects of Korean Civil Law in the 21st Century, Parkyoungsa, p775, 2002.
2	Lee, Yeon Sun, "A Study on the Protection of Famous Trademarks - Focusing on Theory of TrademarkDilution," Yonsei University Graduate School of Law, Master Thesis, p19, 2016.
3	Kim, Jae Hyun, "Essential Structure of Endangerment Offense", Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, p146, 2017.
4	Ahn, Won Ha, "Restrictive Interpretation of Abstract Endangerment Offense", Chonbuk National UniversityLaw Research Institute, Law Review, Vol. 46, p233, 2015.
5	Lee, HyeonDong, "The Expansive Trends and Problems of Abstract Endangerment Offense - Focusing on Discussions in Germany, Law Journal Vol. 10, p132, 2001,
6	Kim, Tae Myung, "Problems of Endangerment Offense and Its Limited Interpretation and Application", Dong-A Law No. 51, p105 2011.
7	Korean Charcoal Barbecue vs. Korea Chon-Dak Charcoal Barbecue, the Supreme Court. Sentence No. 2009-do-11221 Apr. 28, 2011.
8	Lee, JaeSang, Review of Criminal Law (Guaranteed Edition), Parkyoungsa, p511(2017)
9	Bae, Jong Dae, Review of Criminal Law, Hongmunsa, p640, 2018.
10	Textbookfor Judicial Research and Training Institute, the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Commentary and Precedent), p18, 2008.
11	The Supreme Court. 2002 Term: Leading Cases; III. Federal Statutes and Regulations: E. Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 117, Harvard Law Review, p435.
12	The Supreme Court,Sentence No. 2002-da-13782 May 14, 2004.
13	Kenneth L.Port, "The Unnatural Expansion of Trademark Rights: Is a Federal Dilution Statute Necessary?", TMR, Vol. 85 No.5, p545.
14	Steve Hartman, "Brand Equity Impartment - The Meaning of Dilution", Vol. 87, p424-428.
15	Kim, Won Oh, "The reality and application requirements of diluted stagnation theory of famous trademark", Intellectual Property Law Study Vol. 4, Conference for Korea Intellectual Property Society, p.348, 2000.