Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2014.19.9.185

Analysis about Learning Objectives of Informatics Textbooks in High School using Anderson's and Fuller's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives  

Choe, Hyun-Jong (Dept. of Computer Science Education, Seowon University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information / v.19, no.9, 2014 , pp. 185-196 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study has analyzed the learning objectives in 6 Informatics textbooks that were published this year in the basis of 2009 revised curriculum using Anderson's taxonomy of Educational Objectives that was a revision of Bloom's taxonomy and Fuller's taxonomy that was presented for programming activities. Some dimensions of Anderson's taxonomy, such as conceptual and procedural knowledge, understand and apply in cognitive process are much more used in learning objectives in 6 Informatics textbooks. Interpreting and producing dimensions of taxonomy are well presented to balance in 6 Informatics textbooks by analysis of Fuller's taxonomy. This results will be a good case study in research about taxonomy of educational objectives and development of Informatics textbooks.
Keywords
Taxonomy of educational objectives; Informatics textbooks in high school; Analysis about learning objectives;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 M. O. Kim and H. S. Kang, "Analysis of Instructional Objectives of the Elementary Korean Curriculum Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.30, No.1, pp. 27-58, 2012.
2 H. J. Jin, "Analysis and Standard Development of Instructional Objectives for Informatics Subject in Elementary School", The Journal of Korean association of computer education, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 47-59, 2009.
3 H. J. Choe, "Study of Analysis About Learning Objectives of Informatics Textbooks in Middle School using Anderson's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives". The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 51-63, 2014.
4 Ministry of Educational Science and Technology, "Informatics Subject of 2007 Revised Curriculum", 2007.
5 Ministry of Educational Science and Technology, "Informatics Subject of 2009 Revised Curriculum", 2011.
6 D. E. Biling and B. S. Furniss, "Aims, Methods and Assessment in Advanced Science Education". Heyden, 1973.
7 E. A. Lahtinen, "A Categorization of Novice Programmers: A Cluster Analysis Study", Proceedings of the 19th annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 32-41, 2007.
8 C. Andrew, "Bloom's Digital Taxonomy", http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom%27s+Digital+Taxonomy
9 A. D. Hauenstein, "Conceptual Framework for Educational Objective: A Holistic Approach to Traditional Taxonomies", University Press of America, 1998.
10 R. J. Marzano, "Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Corwin Press, 2001.
11 L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, et al., "A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives". Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
12 U. Fuller, et al., "Developing a Computer Science-Specific Learning Taxonomy". ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol.39, No.4, pp. 152-170, 2007.   DOI
13 H.S.Kim, et al., "Classifications of Instructional Objectives of Elementary Science based on Bloom`s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, Vol.26, No.5, pp. 570-579, 2007.   과학기술학회마을
14 M.J.Lee, et al., "Analysis of Home Economics Textbooks of 2007 Revised Curriculum Based on 'A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, Vol.17, No.2, pp. 149-176, 2011.   DOI
15 Y.H.Kim, et al., "Analysis of Summative Evaluation Objectives in Middle School Biology based on Bloom`s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Research about Science Education, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 164-174, 2010.
16 C.G.Park, et al., "A Comparative Analysis of Instructional Objectives of Laboratory Work in Korean and U. S. High School Biology Textbooks according to Bloom's Revised Taxonomy", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 27-43, 2011.
17 G. Y. Lee and T. M. You, "Analysis of Cognitive Learning Objectives in the 2007 Home Economics High School Textbooks and Achievement Standards by the Anderson's 'Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives", Journal of Korean Home Economies Education Association, Vol.23, No.3, pp. 53-68, 2011.
18 Online dictionary, 'education', http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=510035&cid=42126&categoryId=42126
19 Online dictionary, 'instructional objectives', http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1944124&cid=41989&categoryId=41989
20 S.B.Park, et al., "Effective Teaching", Academy Press, 2006.
21 D. R. Krathwohl, "A Revision Bloom's Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory into Practice", pp. 212-218, 2002.
22 B. S. Bloom, "Taxonomy of Education Objectives, Handbook I : Cognitive Domain", Longman, 1956.
23 D. R. Krathwohl, et al., "Taxonomy for Educational Objectives, Handbook 2: Affective Domain", David McKay Co., 1964.
24 A. J. Harrow, "A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain", David McKay Co., 1972.
25 C.H.Lim, "Analysis of Objectives and Contents of Nature Subject in Elementary School", Journal of Elementary Education, Vol.10, 1997.
26 G. M. Seddon, "The Properties of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objective for the Cognitive Domain", Review of Educational Research, Vol.48, No.2, pp. 303-323, 1978.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 C. G. Johnson and U. Fuller, "Is Bloom's Taxonomy Appropriate for Computer Science", '06 Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research. New York, ACM, 2006.