Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2013.18.11.221

Cybersquatting-related Precedent Tendency  

Oh, Tae-Kon (College of Law, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information / v.18, no.11, 2013 , pp. 221-227 More about this Journal
Abstract
Cybersquatting is a type of conflicts between a trademark and a domain, and refers to "behaviors of registering, retaining, transferring, and using the identical or similar domain name in bad faith for the profit from the mark such as trademark". That is, it is preoccupying behavior to abuse the fact that the domain name in the Internet can be freely registered on a first come, first served basis and can't duplicate. Though this should be prohibited, given the reality that most of our daily lives are based in the Internet, this is creating many problems in IT environment beyond social structure in rule of law. Therefore, this study has the purpose that it provides cybersquatting-related information and suggests legislative implications hereafter through the analysis of cybersquatting-related precedent from the Supreme Court.
Keywords
Cyber-Squatting; Internet Domain Name; Internet Domain Dispute; ICANN; UDRP;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Supreme Court 2013.4.26. Sentence 2011DA64836
2 15 U.S.C. $\S$ 1125(d)(1)(A).
3 Microsoft Corp. v. Amish P. Shah et al., Case No. C-10-0653 RSM (01/12/11).
4 Ford Motor Co. v. Great Domains.com, Inc., 177 F. Supp. 2d 656 (E.D. Mich. 2001).
5 Seoul Central district court 2007.8.30. Sentence 2006GAHAP53066. : http://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/panre/sjo100.do?contId=1982812&q=2006%EA%B0%80%ED%95%A953066&nq=&w=yegu§ion=yegu_tot&subw=&subsection=&subId=&csq=&groups=&category=&outmax=1&msort=&onlycount=&sp=&d1=&d2=&d3=&d4=&d5=&pg=0&p1=&p2=01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=&p7=&p8=&p9=&p10=&p11=&p12=&sysCd=&tabGbnCd=&saNo=&joNo=&lawNm=&hanjaYn=N&userSrchHistNo=&poption=&srch=&range=&tabId= (Searching at 2013.10.7)
6 Supreme Court 2011.5.26. Sentence 2009DA15596. : http://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/panre/sjo100.do?contId=2060632&q=2009%EB%8B%A415596&nq=&w=yegu§ion=yegu_tot&subw=&subsection=&subId=&csq=&groups=&category=&outmax=1&msort=&onlycount=&sp=&d1=&d2=&d3=&d4=&d5=&pg=0&p1=&p2=01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=&p7=&p8=&p9=&p10=&p11=&p12=&sysCd=&tabGbnCd=&saNo=&joNo=&lawNm=&hanjaYn=N&userSrchHistNo=&poption=&srch=&range=&tabId= (Searching at 2013.10.7)
7 Supreme Court 2013.4.26. Sentence 2011DA64836. : http://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/panre/sjo100.do?contId=2115116&q=2011%EB%8B%A464836&nq=&w=yegu§ion=yegu_tot&subw=&subsection=&subId=&csq=&groups=&category=&outmax=1&msort=&onlycount=&sp=&d1=&d2=&d3=&d4=&d5=&pg=0&p1=&p2=01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=&p7=&p8=&p9=&p10=&p11=&p12=&sysCd=&tabGbnCd=&saNo=&joNo=&lawNm=&hanjaYn=N&userSrchHistNo=&poption=&srch=&range=&tabId= (Searching at 2013.10.7)
8 Supreme Court 2013.9.12. Sentence 2011DA57661.: http://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/panre/sjo100.do?contId=2131461&q=2011%EB%8B%A457661&nq=&w=yegu§ion=yegu_tot&subw=&subsection=&subId=&csq=&groups=&category=&outmax=1&msort=&onlycount=&sp=&d1=&d2=&d3=&d4=&d5=&pg=0&p1=&p2=01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=&p7=&p8=&p9=&p10=&p11=&p12=&sysCd=&tabGbnCd=&saNo=&joNo=&lawNm=&hanjaYn=N&userSrchHistNo=&poption=&srch=&range=&tabId= (Searching at 2013.10.7)