Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2013.18.10.183

A Study on Relationship Among Strategic Leadership, Resistance and Perceived Performance After M＆A -Focused on IT Companies-  

Kim, Sung-Gun (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information / v.18, no.10, 2013 , pp. 183-192 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of the strategic leadership of CEOs after M&A on resistance to change and on perceived performance. Most M&A research has focused on the strategic, financial and economic aspects, while studies on leadership and employee behavior have been limited. CEO leadership is critical to a successful M&A. Recently, strategic leadership has been attracting more attention. Strategic leadership can be defined as a person's ability to anticipate, envision, maintain flexibility, think strategically and to work with others to initiate changes that will create a viable future for an organization. It can also reduce resistance and improve perceived performance. So this paper used empirical studies from the IT industry after M&A.
Keywords
Strategic leadership; Resistance; perceived performance; M&A;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim Kyung-Sik, "A Study on the Performance of the M&A Firm on KOSDAQ," Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 12(1): 229-239, January 2007.   과학기술학회마을
2 Ahn Yeon-Sik, "The Empirical Analysis on the Relevancy Between the IT Competency of the Group Enterprises, and the IT Service Firms' Management Performance," Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 15(7), July 2010.
3 Moon Chul-Woo, "Post-Merger Integration: Human Resource Strategy," Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, December 2007.
4 Kim Sung-Gun, "A Study on Strategic Leadership Integration Strategy, Resistance, Attitude in M&A," Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, August 2013.
5 Hambrick, D. C., "Guest editor's introduction: Putting top Managers back in the strategy picture," Strategic Management Journal, 10 , special issue, pp. 5-15, August 1989.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Pettigrew, A., Starkey, K., & Hambrick, D.,. "Power and Change: Andrew Pettigrew on Strategy and Change [and Commentary]," The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 45-47, August 2001.
7 Cannella, A. A., & Monroe, M. J., "Contrasting perspectives on strategic leaders: Toward a more realistic view of top managers," Journal of Management, 23(3), 213-237, June 1997.
8 Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C., "Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion," Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503, September 1990.
9 Handscombe, R. S., & Norman, P. A., "Strategic leadership, Managing the missing links," 2nd, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., April 1993.
10 Elenkov, D. S., Judge, W., & Wright, P., "Strategic Leadership and Executive Innovation Influence: An International Multi-culture Comparative Study," Strategic Management Journal, 26, 665-682, January 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A., "Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership," Academy of Management Executive, 13(1): 43-57, February 1999.
12 Boal, K. B., & R. Hooijberg, "Strategic Leadership Research : Moving on.," Leadership Quarterly, 11, pp. 515-549, Winter 2001
13 Habeck, M. M., Kroher, F., & Tram, M. R., "After Merger: Seven Rules for Successful Post Merger Integration," London, Prentice-Hall, July 2000.
14 Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R. & Grau, J., "Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change.," Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 22, pp.59-80, May 1994.   DOI
15 Dawson, P., "Organizational change," A processual approach. P. Chapman, January 1994.
16 Chawla, A., & Kelloway, E. K., "Predicting openness and commitment to change.," The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(6), pp. 485-498, May 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sin Yoo-Geun, "Management for Human Respect," Dasan, July 2005.
18 Oreg, S., "Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), pp. 73-101, December 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Park Jung-Min, "The Effect of the Interaction Between Inter-firm Relatedness and Post Acquisition Integration Process on Cross-border Acquisition Performance," Yonsei University, August 2009.
20 Bruton, G. D., Oviatt, B. M., & White, M. A., "Performance of Acquisitions of Distressed Firms," Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 972-989, August 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Harrison, P. M., Lawson, D. M., Artymiuk, P. J., Yewdall, S. J., Smith, J. M., Livingstone, J. C., & Treffry, A., "Solving the structure of human H ferritin by genetically engineering intermolecular crystal contacts," Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, February 1991.
22 Jemison, D. B. & S. B. Sitkin, "Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective.," Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 145-163, January 1986.
23 Beamish, P. W., & Delios, A., "Improving joint venture performance through congruent measures of success," Cooperative strategies: European perspectives, 997., January 1997.
24 Homburg, C. & M. Bucerus, "Is Speed of Integration Really a Success Factor of Mergers and Acquisitions? An analysis of the Role of Internal and External Relatedness.," Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 347-367, April 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Hair et al., "Multivariate data analysis," February 2006.
26 Lim Jong-Won, "This is a Marketing Research," Bupmun, January 1996.
27 Noh Hyung-Jin, "Research Methods and Statistical Analysis by SPSS 12.0," Seoul: Hyungsul, February 2005.