1 |
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39-71.
DOI
|
2 |
Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2007). Communication by Central Bank committee members: Different strategies, same effectiveness? Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 39(2/3), 509-541.
DOI
|
3 |
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 241-267.
DOI
|
4 |
Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29.
DOI
|
5 |
Kuswoyo, H., & Siregar, R. A. (2019). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in oral business presentation. Lingua Cultura, 13(4), 297-304.
DOI
|
6 |
Vande Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
DOI
|
7 |
Roslan, S., Roslina, A. A., Noli, N., Mohd. R. I., & Norzie, D. B. (2018). The development of the Malaysian Corpus of Financial English, GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(3), 73-100.
DOI
|
8 |
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
|
9 |
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825.
DOI
|
10 |
Desma, P. A., & Ingatan, G. (2020). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in Jacinda Ardern speech at Christchurch Memorial. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 70-77.
DOI
|
11 |
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text & Talk, 18(3), 349-382.
|
12 |
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
DOI
|
13 |
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in scholastic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
DOI
|
14 |
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2018). "In this paper we suggest": Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30.
DOI
|
15 |
Mauranen, A. (1993a). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: A textlinguistic study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
|
16 |
Nan, Y., & Liu, L. (2013). Investigating the interpersonal and textual meaning of Steve Jobs' Stanford speech in terms of Hyland's Metadiscourse Theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(4), 90-96.
DOI
|
17 |
Sukma, B. P. (2017). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Barack Obama's 2012 campaign speeches. Aksara, 29(2), 283-292.
DOI
|
18 |
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78.
DOI
|
19 |
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207-226.
DOI
|
20 |
Yuting, Z. (2018) An intercultural analysis of personal metadiscourse in English and Chinese commencement. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(5), 100-110.
DOI
|
21 |
Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
|
22 |
Adel, A., & Maurenan, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11.
DOI
|
23 |
Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrio-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99.
DOI
|
24 |
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
|
25 |
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.
DOI
|