1 |
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: the roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115-135.
DOI
|
2 |
Bailey, K. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
3 |
Bhat, S., & Yoon, S. (2015). Automatic assessment of syntactic complexity for spontaneous speech scoring. Speech Communication, 67, 42-57.
DOI
|
4 |
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
5 |
Council of Europe (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
|
6 |
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
DOI
|
7 |
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices. Language Testing, 29(2), 243-263.
DOI
|
8 |
Ferris, D. R. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 414-420.
DOI
|
9 |
Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners' oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190-208.
DOI
|
10 |
Milanovic, M. (2009). Cambridge ESOL and the CEFR. Research Notes, 37, 2-5.
|
11 |
Tono, Y. (Ed.). (2013). The CEFR-J Handbook: A Resource Book for Using CAN-DO Descriptors for English Language Teaching. Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing.
|
12 |
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36-62.
DOI
|
13 |
Yoon, H. (2017). Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topic, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality, System, 66, 130-141.
DOI
|
14 |
Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & Ferris, D. (2003). Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 377-403.
DOI
|
15 |
Wisniewski, K. (2018). The empirical validity of the Common European Framework of Reference Scales. An exemplary study for the vocabulary and fluency scales in a language testing context. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 933-959.
DOI
|
16 |
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, & Complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
|
17 |
Hawkins, J., & Buttery, P. (2010). Criterial features in learner corpora: theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1(1).1-23.
|
18 |
Hawkins, J., & Filipovic, L. (2012). Criterial Features in L2 English: Specifying the Reference Levels of the Common European Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
19 |
Izumi, E., Uchimoto, K., & Isahara, H. (2004). The NICT JLE corpus: Exploiting the language learners' speech database for research and education. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management ,12(2), 119-125.
|
20 |
Kim, J. (2014). Predicting L2 Writing Proficiency using linguistic complexity measures: A corpus-based study. English Teaching, 69(4), 27-51.
DOI
|
21 |
Kang, O., & Yan, X. (2018). Linguistic features distinguishing examinees' speaking performances at different proficiency levels. Journal of Language Testing & Assessment, 1, 24-39.
DOI
|
22 |
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4),474-496.
DOI
|