Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22925/apjcr.2021.2.1.13

Fillers in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (HKCSE)  

Seto, Andy (The Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education)
Publication Information
Asia Pacific Journal of Corpus Research / v.2, no.1, 2021 , pp. 13-22 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study employed an analytical framework that is characterised by a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative analyses with a specially designed computer software SpeechActConc to examine speech acts in business communication. The naturally occurring data from the audio recordings and the prosodic transcriptions of the business sub-corpora of the HKCSE (prosodic) are manually annotated with a speech act taxonomy for finding out the frequency of fillers, the co-occurring patterns of fillers with other speech acts, and the linguistic realisations of fillers. The discoursal function of fillers to sustain the discourse or to hold the floor has diverse linguistic realisations, ranging from a sound (e.g. 'uhuh') and a word (e.g. 'well') to sounds (e.g. 'um er') and words, namely phrase ('sort of') and clause (e.g. 'you know'). Some are even combinations of sound(s) and word(s) (e.g. 'and um', 'yes er um', 'sort of erm'). Among the top five frequent linguistic realisations of fillers, 'er' and 'um' are the most common ones found in all the six genres with relatively higher percentages of occurrence. The remaining more frequent realisations consist of clause ('you know'), word ('yeah') and sound ('erm'). These common forms are syntactically simpler than the less frequent realisations found in the genres. The co-occurring patterns of fillers and other speech acts are diverse. The more common co-occurring speech acts with fillers include informing and answering. The findings show that fillers are not only frequently used by speakers in spontaneous conversation but also mostly represented in sounds or non-linguistic realisations.
Keywords
Corpus Linguistics; Fillers; Linguistic Realisation; Speech Act Annotation; Spoken Business Discourse;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Facilitating a description of intercultural conversations: The Hong Kong Corpus of Conversational English. ICAME Journal, 20, 5-20.
2 Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73-111.   DOI
3 De Felice, R. (2013). A corpus-based classification of commitments in business English. In Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 (pp. 153-171). Dordrecht: Springer.
4 De Felice, R., Darby, J., Fisher, A., & Peplow, D. (2013). A classification scheme for annotating speech acts in a business email corpus. ICAME Journal, 37, 71-105.
5 Evans, S. (2010). Business as usual: The use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 153-167.   DOI
6 Kallen, J., & Kirk, J. (2012). SPICE-Ireland: A User's Guide. Belfast: Clo Ollscoil na Banriona.
7 Koester, A. (2010). Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.
8 Laserna, C. M., Seih, Y.-T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2014). Um... Who like says you know: Filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328-338.   DOI
9 Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10 Stenstrom, A.-B. (1994). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.
11 Tsui, A. B. M. (1994). English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12 Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2006). From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(4), 411-433.   DOI
13 Weisser, M. (2003). SPAACy - A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 63-74.   DOI
14 Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., Taylor, P., Martin, R., Van Ess-dykema, C., & Meteer, M. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), 339-373.   DOI
15 Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16 Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Methodological issues in genre analysis. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 9(16), 39-59.   DOI
17 Brazil, D. (1997). The Communicative Role of Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18 Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2008). A Corpus-driven Study of Discourse Intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19 Kharismawan, P. Y. (2017). The types and the functions of the fillers used in Barack Obama's speeches. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 111-119.   DOI