Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5856/JKDS.2022.15.1.92

Immediate Loading of Narrow Diameter Implants at the Mandibular Incisor Area Using Full Digital Flow: A Case Report  

Ahn, Ji Ho (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Baek, Yeon-Wha (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital)
Lee, Jungwon (Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Dental Science / v.15, no.1, 2022 , pp. 92-99 More about this Journal
Abstract
This case report describes the immediate loading of narrow diameter implants in the mandibular incisor area using full-digital flow. The 3-dimensional position of the implants was planned using digital software, and the corresponding surgical template was fabricated. The implants were inserted immediately after extraction and on the same day, the interim abutment and bridge were placed. At 8 weeks after surgery, the stability of the implants was measured and a digital impression was made using a scan body. Customized titanium abutments and a cement-type full zirconia bridge were delivered. At 36 weeks' follow-up, no clinical or radiographic complications were detected, and the patient was satisfied with the results.
Keywords
Computer-aided design; Computer-aided manufacturing; Dental implants; Dental prosthesis; Immediate dental implant loading;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bahat O, Sullivan RM. Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part II: algorithm for immediate loading diagnostic factors. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010; 12(Suppl 1): e13-22.   DOI
2 Degidi M, Piattelli A, Carinci F. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 49-54.   DOI
3 Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Narrow-diameter implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29(Suppl 16): 21-40.   DOI
4 Trbakovic A, Bongenhielm U, Thor A. A clinical and radiological long-term follow-up study of narrow diameter implants in the aesthetic area. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20: 598-605.   DOI
5 Shi JY, Xu FY, Zhuang LF, Gu YX, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: a retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 76-81.
6 Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(Suppl 11): 69-76.
7 Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Small-diameter implants: indications and contraindications. J Esthet Dent. 2000; 12: 186-94.   DOI
8 Vigolo P, Givani A. Clinical evaluation of singletooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 50-4.   DOI
9 Oh KC, Jeon C, Park JM, Shim JS. Digital workflow to provide an immediate interim restoration after single-implant placement by using a surgical guide and a matrix-positioning device. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 17-21.   DOI
10 Donos N, Asche NV, Akbar AN, Francisco H, Gonzales O, Gotfredsen K, Haas R, Happe A, Leow N, Navarro JM, Ornekol T, Payer M, Renouard F, Schliephake H. Impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading: summary and consensus statements of group 1-the 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32(Suppl 21): 85-92.
11 Galindo-Moreno P, Padial-Molina M, Nilsson P, King P, Worsaae N, Schramm A, Maiorana C. The influence of the distance between narrow implants and the adjacent teeth on marginal bone levels. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 704-12.   DOI
12 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387-416.   DOI
13 Bahat O, Sullivan RM. Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part I: immediate loading considered in light of the original prerequisites for osseointegration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010; 12(Suppl 1): e2-12.   DOI
14 Cooper LF, Raes F, Reside GJ, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, Wiltfang J, Kern M, de Bruyn H. Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes following immediate provisionalization of single-tooth dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 1222-32.
15 Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computeraided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23(Suppl 6): 112-23.   DOI
16 Rosenquist B. A comparison of various methods of soft tissue management following the immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 43-51.
17 Galindo-Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Worsaae N, Schramm A, Padial-Molina M, Maiorana C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow-diameter implants: 5-year follow-up of a multicenter prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1584-91.   DOI
18 Zhang S, Wang S, Song Y. Immediate loading for implant restoration compared with early or conventional loading: a meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45: 793-803.   DOI
19 Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(Suppl): 237-59.
20 Cardaropoli G, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Periimplant bone alterations in relation to inter-unit distances. A 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14: 430-6.   DOI
21 Heo YK, Lim YJ. A newly designed screw- and cement-retained prosthesis and its abutments. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28: 612-4.   DOI