Accuracy of Bite Registration Using Intraoral Scanner Based on Data Trimming Strategy for Fremitus Teeth |
Jeong, Yuwon
(Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Kim, Jee-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Kim, Jong-Eun (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Lee, Hyeonjong (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) |
1 | Wieckiewicz M, Grychowska N, Zietek M, Wieckiewicz W. Evaluation of the elastic properties of thirteen silicone interocclusal recording materials. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 7456046. |
2 | Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Tsagarakis A, Kourakis G, Pavlakis E. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: a single-blinded in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124: 581-8. DOI |
3 | Zimmermann M, Ender A, Mehl A. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020; 151: 127-35. DOI |
4 | Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M, Sasamoto S, Iijima M, Mizoguchi I. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning. Dent Mater J. 2018; 37: 628-33. DOI |
5 | Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 799-806. DOI |
6 | Joda T, Bragger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 1401-6. DOI |
7 | Park JM, Jeon J, Heo SJ. Accuracy comparison of buccal bite scans by five intra-oral scanners. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2018; 34: 17-31. DOI |
8 | Dua P, Gupta SH, Ramachandran S, Sandhu HS. Evaluation of four elastomeric interocclusal recording materials. Med J Armed Forces India. 2007; 63: 237-40. DOI |
9 | Sweeney S, Smith DK, Messersmith M. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148: 245-52. DOI |
10 | Kim JH, Son SA, Lee H, Yoo YJ, Hong SJ, Park JK. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12824. [Epub ahead of print] DOI |
11 | Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 554-9. DOI |
12 | Megremis S, Tiba A, Vogt K. An evaluation of eight elastomeric occlusal registration materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012; 143: 1358-60. DOI |
13 | Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 1495-504. DOI |
14 | Camci H, Salmanpour F. A new technique for testing accuracy and sensitivity of digital bite registration: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthod. 2021; 19: 425-32. DOI |
15 | Ponce-Garcia C, Ruellas ACO, Cevidanes LHS, Flores-Mir C, Carey JP, Lagravere-Vich M. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients. Head Face Med. 2020; 16: 1. DOI |
16 | Breeding LC, Dixon DL. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 876-8. DOI |