Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5856/JKDS.2019.12.1.13

Comparison of Flexural Strength of Three-Dimensional Printed Three-Unit Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses according to Build Directions  

Park, Sang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Dental Science / v.12, no.1, 2019 , pp. 13-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength of provisional fixed dental prostheses which was three-dimensional (3D) printed by several build directions. Materials and Methods: A metal jig with two abutment teeth and pontic space in the middle was fabricated. This jig was scanned with a desktop scanner and provisional restoration was designed on dental computer-aided design program. On the preprocessing software, the build angles of the restorations were arranged at $0^{\circ}$, $30^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $60^{\circ}$, and $90^{\circ}$ and support was added and resultant structure was sliced to a thickness of $100{\mu}m$. Processed restorations were printed with digital light processing type 3D printer using poly methyl meta acrylate-based resin. After washing and post-curing, compressive loading was applied at a speed of 1 mm/min on a metal jig fixed to a universal testing machine. The maximum pressure at which fracture occurred was measured. For the statistical analysis, build direction was set as the independent variable and fracture strength as the dependent variable. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc analysis was conducted to compare fracture strength among groups (${\alpha}=0.05$). Result: The mean flexural strength of provisional restoration 3D printed with the build direction of $0^{\circ}$ was $1,053{\pm}168N$; it was $1,183{\pm}188N$ at $30^{\circ}$, $1,178{\pm}81N$ at $45^{\circ}$, $1,166{\pm}133N$ at $60^{\circ}$, and $949{\pm}170N$ at $90^{\circ}$. The group with a build direction of $90^{\circ}$ showed significantly lower flexural strength than other groups (P<0.05). The flexural strength was significantly higher when the build direction was $30^{\circ}$ than when it was $90^{\circ}$ (P<0.01). Conclusion: Among the build directions $0^{\circ}$, $30^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $60^{\circ}$, and $90^{\circ}$ set for 3D printing of fixed dental prosthesis, an orientation of $30^{\circ}$ is recommended as an effective build direction for 3D printing.
Keywords
CAD/CAM; Fixed partial denture; Flexural strength; Printing; three-dimensional;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014; 23: 1917-28.   DOI
2 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 3-12.   DOI
3 Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 536-42.   DOI
4 Fernandes N, van den Heever J, Hoogendijk C, Botha S, Booysen G, Els J. Reconstruction of an extensive midfacial defect using additive manufacturing techniques. J Prosthodont. 2016; 25: 589-94.   DOI
5 Al Mortadi N, Jones Q, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, Williams RJ. Fabrication of a resin appliance with alloy components using digital technology without an analog impression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015; 148: 862-7.   DOI
6 Chen J, Ahmad R, Suenaga H, Li W, Sasaki K, Swain M, Li Q. Shape optimization for additive manufacturing of removable partial dentures--a new paradigm for prosthetic CAD/CAM. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0132552.   DOI
7 Nakata T, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C. Clasp fabrication using one-process molding by repeated laser sintering and high-speed milling. J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 61: 276-82.   DOI
8 Wu GH, Hsu SH. Review: polymeric-based 3D printing for tissue engineering. J Med Biol Eng. 2015; 35: 285-92.   DOI
9 Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 760-7.   DOI
10 Atzeni E, Salmi A. Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2012; 62: 1147-55.   DOI
11 Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed fullcoverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont. 2016; 29: 503-10.   DOI
12 Partiyan A, Osman E, Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Fracture resistance of three-unit zirconia fixed partial denture with modified framework. Odontology. 2017; 105: 62-7.   DOI
13 Rismanchian M, Shafiei S, Nourbakhshian F, Davoudi A. Flexural strengths of implant-supported zirconia based bridges in posterior regions. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6: 346-50.   DOI
14 Abdulmohsen B, Parker S, Braden M, Patel MP. A study to investigate and compare the physicomechanical properties of experimental and commercial temporary crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater. 2016; 32: 200-10.   DOI
15 Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build angle: does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology? Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30: 182-8.   DOI
16 Vayrynen VO, Tanner J, Vallittu PK. The anisotropicity of the flexural properties of an occlusal device material processed by stereolithography. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 811-7.   DOI
17 Zhang H, Zhang Z, Friedrich K. Effect of fiber length on the wear resistance of short carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2007; 67: 222-30.   DOI