Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5856/JKDS.2017.10.2.87

Removable Partial Denture Using Anterior Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses for Edentulous Patients: A Case Report  

Lee, You-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Bae, Eun-Bin (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Lee, Jin-Ju (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Ji-Young (Department of Dental Hygiene, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology)
Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Dental Science / v.10, no.2, 2017 , pp. 87-95 More about this Journal
Abstract
This case study was to report the possible increase in the denture retention and psychological relief using the implant-supported fixed prostheses in a completely edentulous patient. The implants were placed in the anterior portion of the mandible in a patient who had completely edentulous state following the extraction of residual abutment teeth, and consequently a distal extension removable partial denture was fabricated. The patient's adaptation and satisfaction to the new prosthesis was monitored and confirmed in terms of masticatory function and esthetics, by restoring the oral condition similar to initial status before the residual teeth extraction. After 6 months, radiographic examination confirmed that both the abutment teeth and the implants were stable and well maintained. Considering the relatively short clinical follow-up period, however, continuous long-term monitoring was required.
Keywords
Dental prosthesis, implant-supported; Denture, partial, removable; Mandibular prosthesis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE. Long-term effects on chewing with mandibular fixed prostheses on osseointegrated implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1985; 43: 39-45.   DOI
2 Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134: 1455-8.   DOI
3 Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 3: 81-100.   DOI
4 Kourtis SG, Sotiriadou S, Voliotis S, Challas A. Private practice results of dental implants. Part I: survival and evaluation of risk factors--Part II: surgical and prosthetic complications. Implant Dent. 2004; 13: 373-85.   DOI
5 Phillips K, Wong KM. Space requirements for implant-retained bar-and-clip overdentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22: 516-8, 520, 522.
6 al-Ali F, Heath MR, Wright PS. Chewing performance and occlusal contact area with the shortened dental arch. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1998; 6: 127-32.
7 DeBoer J. Edentulous implants: overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69: 386-90.   DOI
8 Mijiritsky E, Karas S. Removable partial denture design involving teeth and implants as an alternative to unsuccessful fixed implant therapy: a case report. Implant Dent. 2004; 13: 218-22.   DOI
9 Jackson TR. Removable partial overdentures with natural root structure and osseointegrated fixtures. Dent Clin North Am. 1990; 34: 711-28.
10 Mijiritsky E. Implants in conjunction with removable partial dentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2007; 16: 146-54.   DOI
11 Starr NL. The distal extension case: an alternative restorative design for implant prosthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21: 61-7.
12 Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, Beck DA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I--Retention, stability, and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73: 354-63.   DOI
13 Cune MS, de Putter C, Hoogstraten J. Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part I--Clinical findings and predictability of clinical treatment outcome. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72: 144-51.   DOI
14 Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 329-36.   DOI
15 Mitrani R, Brudvik JS, Phillips KM. Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 353-9.
16 Cune MS, de Putter C, Hoogstraten J. Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: Part II--Patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72: 152-8.   DOI
17 Jang Y, Emtiaz S, Tarnow DP. Single implantsupported crown used as an abutment for a removable cast partial denture: a case report. Implant Dent. 1998; 7: 199-204.   DOI
18 Pellecchia M, Pellecchia R, Emtiaz S. Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture connected to an anterior fixed implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 607-12.   DOI
19 Watson RM, Davis DM, Forman GH, Coward T. Considerations in design and fabrication of maxillary implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 1991; 4: 232-9.