Assessing the Influence of Anteroposterior Lip Position Based on Esthetic Line on the Perceived Attractiveness |
Jung, Ha-Yoon
(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Oh, Je-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) Zheng, Hui (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) Chung, Kwang (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) Jung, Seunggon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) |
1 | Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1980; 8: 244-56. DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Sarver DM. The esthetic impact of orthodontics: planning treatment to meet patients' needs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993; 124: 99-102. |
3 | Papel ID. Quantitative facial aesthetic evaluation with computer imaging. Facial Plast Surg. 1990; 7: 35-44. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43: 34-40. |
5 | Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104: 180-7. DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod. 1968; 54: 272-89. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1960; 46: 721-35. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1967; 53: 262-84. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84: 1-28. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Hsu BS. Comparisons of the five analytic reference lines of the horizontal lip position: their consistency and sensitivity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104: 355-60. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104: 240-50. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114: 1-7. |
13 | Song S, Choi IC. A study on the facial esthetic preferences among Korean youths: assessment of profile preferences. Korean J Orthod. 1992; 22: 881-920. 과학기술학회마을 |
14 | Ko SJ, Kim HS, Kim YJ. The influence of gender or culture on determining esthetic facial profile. Korean J Orthod. 2001; 31: 301-9. 과학기술학회마을 |
15 | Kazanis K. An evaluation of lip attractiveness. Place unknwon: Saint Louis University; 2012. |
16 | Choi JG, Lee KS. A study of esthetic facial profile preference in Korean. Korean J Orthod. 2002;32:327-42. 과학기술학회마을 |
17 | Burcal RG, Laskin DM, Sperry TP. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 45: 666-70. DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24: 1-7. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 402-8. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Phillips C, Tulloch C, Dann C. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992; 20: 214-20. DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med. 1969; 62: 989-93. |
22 | Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127: 692-9. DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 201-5. DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Nomura M, Motegi E, Hatch JP, Gakunga PT, Ng'ang'a PM, Rugh JD, Yamaguchi H. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for softtissue profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(4 suppl): S87-95. DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Kuroda S, Sugahara T, Takabatake S, Taketa H, Ando R, Takano-Yamamoto T. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 73-8. DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63: 175-82. |
27 | Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970; 40: 284-318. |
28 | Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1978; 73: 648-57. DOI ScienceOn |
29 | Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H, van der Linden FP, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979; 98: 209-12. DOI |
30 | Bell R, Kiyak HA, Joondeph DR, McNeill RW, Wallen TR. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 323-32. DOI ScienceOn |