Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20220091

Comparison of changes in functional characteristics of fermented soybean with different microbial strains  

Hyewon Lim (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University)
Bosung Kim (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University)
Heewon Jung (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University)
Sungkwon Park (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science / v.49, no.4, 2022 , pp. 995-1001 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of solid-state fermentation on soybean using three microbial strains under four different fermentation times. Soybean was fermented for 12, 24, 36 or 48 hours with highly proteolytic microbes, either Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BA), B. subtilis (BS), or B. subtilis var. natto (BN), and levels of total protein concentration, protein distribution, and antioxidant activity were analyzed. Total protein was highest in the BS 12 h group (9.21 ㎍·µL-1) and lowest in BN 48 h (6.80 ㎍·µL-1), respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, three microbes decomposed large molecular weight proteins as well as major allergens of soybean such as β-conglycinin, Gly m Bd 30K, and glycinin. Each treatment group showed the highest degradation rate at 48 h fermentation and among the three microbes, BS showed a relatively higher degradation rate. The radical scavenging ability, known as an indicator of antioxidant activity, showed a significant increase in all treatment groups except BA 24 h. The results from this study suggest that protein concentration, and degradation and antioxidant activity were affected by different types of microbial trains and fermentation period and that B. subtilis fermentation might be the most effective way to increase nutritional and functional properties of soybean.
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis; solid-state fermentation; soybean;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Frias J, Young SS, Martinez-Villaluenga C, De Mejia EG, Vidal-Valverde C. 2008. Immunoreactivity and amino acid content of fermented soybean products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56:99-105.   DOI
2 Mugisha J, Asekova S, Kulkarni KP, Park CW, Lee J. 2016. Evaluation of crude protein, crude oil, total flavonoid, total polyphenol content and DPPH activity in the sprouts from a high oleic acid soybean cultivar. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:723-733.
3 Ngalimat MS, Yahaya RSR, Baharudin MMAA, Yaminudin SM, Karim M, Ahmad SA, Sabri S. 2021. A review on the biotechnological applications of the operational group Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Microorganisms 9:1-18.
4 Nishinari K, Fang Y, Guo S, Phillips GO. 2014. Soy proteins: A review on composition, aggregation and emulsification. Food Hydrocolloids 39:301-318.   DOI
5 Ra SH, Bae HC, Nam M. 2022. Effects of soybean meal fermented by Bacillus coagulans NRR1207 and kefir on the feeding characteristics of weaned HANWOO calves and Holstein cows. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 49:93-102. [in Korean]
6 Ruiz Sella SRB, Bueno T, de Oliveira AAB, Karp SG, Soccol CR. 2021. Bacillus subtilis natto as a potential probiotic in animal nutrition. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 41:355-369.   DOI
7 Sanjukta S, Rai AK, Muhammed A, Jeyaram K, Talukdar NC. 2015. Enhancement of antioxidant properties of two soybean varieties of Sikkim Himalayan region by proteolytic Bacillus subtilis fermentation. Journal of Functional Foods 14:650-658.   DOI
8 Schallmey M, Singh A, Ward OP. 2004. Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 50:1-17.
9 Singhania RR, Patel AK, Soccol CR, Pandey A. 2009. Recent advances in solid-state fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal 44:13-18.
10 Wang T, Liang Y, Wu M, Chen Z, Lin J, Yang L. 2015. Natural products from Bacillus subtilis with antimicrobial properties. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 23:744-754.   DOI
11 Woldemariamyohannes K, Wan Z, Yu Q, Li H, Wei X, Liu Y, Wang J, Sun B. 2020. Prebiotic, probiotic, antimicrobial, and functional food applications of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:14709-14727.   DOI
12 Yang J, Wu XB, Chen HL, Sun-waterhouse D, Zhong HB, Cui C. 2019. A value-added approach to improve the nutritional quality of soybean meal byproduct: Enhancing its antioxidant activity through fermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SWJS22. Food Chemistry 272:396-403.   DOI
13 Yang Y, Wang Q, Lei L, Li F, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Li L, Wang Q, Ming J. 2020. Molecular interaction of soybean glycinin and β-conglycinin with (-)-epigallocatechin gallate induced by pH changes. Food Hydrocolloids 108:106010.
14 Zhang Q, Tong X, Qi B, Wang Z, Li Y, Sui X, Jiang L. 2018. Changes in antioxidant activity of Alcalase-hydrolyzed soybean hydrolysate under simulated gastrointestinal digestion and transepithelial transport. Journal of Functional Foods 42:298-305.   DOI
15 Eom JS, Choi HS. 2015. Inhibition of bacillus cereus growth and toxin production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RD7-7 in fermented soybean products. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 26:44-55.
16 Back C, Han Y, Dumin WB, Park J, Bae Y. 2022. Phylogenetic analysis and biological characterization of Stemphylium species isolated from Allium crops. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 49:113-120. [in Korean]   DOI
17 Bai J, Franco M, Ding Z, Hao L, Ke W, Wang M, Xie D, Li Z, Zhang Y, Ai L, et al. 2022. Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on fermentation, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts of whole-plant corn silage. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 13:1-14.   DOI