Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20220063

Supply models for stability of supply-demand in the Korean pork market  

Chunghyeon, Kim (Livestock Outlook Team, Center for Agricultural Outlook, Korea Rural Economic Institute)
Hyungwoo, Lee (Livestock Outlook Team, Center for Agricultural Outlook, Korea Rural Economic Institute)
Tongjoo, Suh (Modeling Research Team, Center for Agricultural Outlook, Korea Rural Economic Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science / v.49, no.3, 2022 , pp. 679-690 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the supply and demand of pork has become a significant concern in Korea, controlling it has become a critical challenge for the industry. However, compared to the demand for pork, which has relatively stable consumption, it is not easy to maintain a stable supply. As the preparation of measures for a supply-demand crisis response and supply control in the pig industry has emerged as an important task, it has become necessary to establish a stable supply model and create an appropriate manual. In this study, a pork supply prediction model is constructed using reported data from the pig traceability system. Based on the derived results, a method for determining the supply-demand crisis stage using a statistical approach was proposed. From the results of the analysis, working days, African swine fever, heat wave, and Covid-19 were shown to affect the number of pigs graded in the market. A test of the performance of the model showed that both in-sample error rate and out-sample error rate were between 0.3 - 7.6%, indicating a high level of predictive power. Applying the forecast, the distribution of the confidence interval of the predicted value was established, and the supply crisis stage was identified, evaluating supply-demand conditions.
Keywords
forecasting; pork market; supply control; supply crisis stage; supply model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Andrews DW. 1991. Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59:817-858.   DOI
2 APQA (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency). 2020. Slaughter record 2020. Accessed in https://www.qia.go.kr/livestock/clean/listTcsjWebAction.do?clear=1 on 3 May 2022.
3 Chavas JP, Holt MT. 1991. On nonlinear dynamics: The case of the pork cycle. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73:819-828.   DOI
4 Chuluunsaikhan T, Ryu G, Yoo KH, Rah H, Nasridinov A. 2020. Incorporating deep learning and news topic modeling for forecasting pork prices: The case of South Korea. Agriculture 10:513.   DOI
5 Deaton A, Muellbauer J. 1980. Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK.
6 Devadoss S, Westhoff PC, Helmar MD, Grundmeier E, Skold KD, Meyers WH, Johnson SR. 1989. The FAPRI modeling system at CARD: A documentation summary. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
7 Gouk S, Seo H, Suh T, Kwon S, Kim K. 2021. Situation and implications for recent agricultural product price changes. KREI Agri-Policy Focus, Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
8 Greene WH. 2012. Econometric analysis 7th edition. Prentice Hall, England, UK.
9 Han S. 2020. Study on development of mid- to long-term outlook model based on pig traceability information. Korean Pork Self-Help Fund Management Committee, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
10 Lee H, Ji S, Kim C, Kang J. 2022. Trends and projection of supply of Korean beef, pigs, and dairy cows. Agricultural outlook 2022: Agriculture and rural areas, seeing new hope. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
11 Lee H, Ji S, Suh T. 2021. Monthly Hanwoo supply and forecasting models. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:797-806. [in Korean]   DOI
12 MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2020. Agriculture, forestry and livestock food statistics 2020. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
13 McKillop W. 1967. Supply and demand for forest products-an econometric study. Hilgardia 38:1-132.   DOI
14 Newey WK, West KD. 1987. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703-708.   DOI
15 Skold KD, Holt MT. 1988. Dynamic elasticities and flexibilities in a quarterly model of the US pork sector. Proceedings of the NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management. St. Louis, MO, USA.
16 Prescott DM, Stengos T. 1987. Bootstrapping confidence intervals: An application to forecasting the supply of pork. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:266-273.   DOI
17 Ryu G, Nasridinov A, Rah H, Yoo KH. 2020. Forecasts of the amount purchase pork meat by using structured and unstructured big data. Agriculture 10:21.   DOI
18 Seo H, Kim C, Kim J. 2020. A study on development of Korea agricultural outlook model, KREI-KASMO 2020. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
19 Warren GF, Pearson FA. 1928. Interrelationships of supply and price. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
20 Wooldridge JM. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
21 Zeileis A. 2004. Econometric computing with HC and HAC covariance matrix estimators. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Wien, Austria.