Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20220036

Effect of crop load on the yield, fruit quality, and fruit mineral contents of 'RubyS' apples  

Nay Myo, Win (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Dongyong, Lee (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Yang-Yik, Song (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Juhyeon, Park (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Young Sik, Cho (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Moo-Yong, Park (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Youngsuk, Lee (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Hun Joong, Kweon (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Jingi, Yoo (Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University)
In-Kyu, Kang (Department of Horticultural Science, Kyungpook National University)
Jong-Chul, Nam (Apple Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science / v.49, no.3, 2022 , pp. 421-430 More about this Journal
Abstract
Crop load management in apple trees is important for achieving optimum productivity and crop value. Hence, we investigated the influence of different crop loads on the fruit quality, mineral content, and yield of the 'RubyS' apple variety. After 4 weeks of full bloom, the crop load was adjusted by hand thinning to different (5, 10, and 15 fruits·cm-2) trunk cross-sectional areas (TCSA), representing low, medium, and high crop loads. The low crop load increased the fruit size and weight, the development of the red-blushed area, and the peel color a* at harvest; however, it reduced the total number of fruits·tree-1 and yield compared with that of the other crop loads. The medium crop load improved the fruit weight, flesh firmness, and soluble solids content and reduced the fruits·tree-1 but did not affect the fruit size and yield. However, there were no significant differences in the titratable acidity and starch index among the crop loads. The fruit mineral content (phosphorus and potassium) was higher in the low and medium crop loads compared to the high crop load. However, the nitrogen, calcium, and magnesium contents in the fruits were not affected by the crop loads. Overall, this study suggests that a low crop load improves the fruit size and weight, but its effect on the quality and fruit mineral content is similar to that of a medium crop load. Therefore, the optimum crop load level for the 'RubyS' apple trees was approximately 10 fruits·cm-2 TCSA.
Keywords
apple; crop load; fruit mineral contents; fruit quality; yield;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aksic MF, Mutic J, Tesic Z, Meland M. 2020. Evaluation of fruit mineral contents of two apple cultivars grown in organic and integrated production systems. Acta Horticulturae 1281:59-65.   DOI
2 Anthony B, Serra S, Musacchi S. 2019. Optimizing crop load for new apple cultivar: "WA3". Agronomy 9:107.
3 Blanpied GD, Silsby KJ. 1992. Predicting harvest date window for apples. A Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication 221:1-12.
4 Bound SA. 2019. Precision crop load management of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) without chemicals. Horticulturae 5:3.
5 Byers RE, Carbaugh DH. 2002. Effects of thinning time on yield, fruit size, and return bloom of 'York' and 'Golden Delicious' apple trees. Journal of Tree Fruit Production 3:55-62.   DOI
6 Cho KH, Yoon TM. 2006. Fruit quality, yield, and profitability of 'Hongro' apple as affected by crop load. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 24:210-215. [in Korean]
7 Choi SW, Sagong DH, Song YY, Yoon TM. 2009. Optimum crop load of 'Fuji'/M.9 young apple trees. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 27:547-553. [in Korean]
8 Dar JA, Wani AA, Ahmed M, Nazir R, Zargar SM, Javaid K. 2019. Peel colour in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.): An economic quality parameter in fruit market. Scientia Horticulturae 244:50-60.   DOI
9 Dennis FGJR. 2000. The history of fruit thinning. Plant Growth Regulation 31:1-16.   DOI
10 Ding N, Chen Q, Zhu Z, Peng L, Ge S, Jiang Y. 2017. Effects of crop load on distribution and utilization of 13C and 15N and fruit quality of dwarf apple trees. Scientific Reports 7:14172.
11 Doerflinger FC, Miller WB, Nock JF, Watkins CB. 2015. Relationship between starch pattern indices and starch concentrations in the four apple cultivars. Postharvest Biology and Technology 110:86-95.   DOI
12 Embree CG, Myra MTD, Nichols DS, Wright AH. 2007. Effect of blossom density and crop load on growth, fruit quality, and return bloom in 'Honeycrisp' apple. HortScience 42:1622-1625.   DOI
13 Fazio G, Chang L, Grusak MA, Robinson TL. 2015. Apple rootstocks influence mineral nutrient concentration of leaves and fruit. New York Fruit Quarterly 23:11-15.
14 Iwanami H, Moriya-Tanaka Y, Honda C, Hanada T, Wada M. 2018. A model for representing the relationships among crop load, timing of thinning, flower bud formation, and fruit weight in apples. Scientia Horticulturae 242:181-187.   DOI
15 Ferguson IB, Watkins CB. 1992. Crop load affects mineral concentrations and incidence of bitter pit in 'Cox's Orange Pippin' apple fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117:373-376.   DOI
16 Greybe E, Bergh O, Ferreira DI. 1998. Fruit growth and cell multiplication of 'Royal Gala' apples as function of temperature. Applied Plant Science 121:10-14.
17 Harker FR, Kupferman EM, Marin AB, Gunson FA, Triggs CM. 2008. Eating quality standards for apples based on consumer preferences. Postharvest Biology and Technology 50:70-78.   DOI
18 Jung JM, Shim JY, Chung SO, Hwang YS, Lee WH, Lee H. 2019. Changes in quality parameters of tomatoes during storage: A review. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:239-256.   DOI
19 Koike H, Tamai H, Ono T, Shigehara I. 2003. Influence of time of thinning on yield, fruit quality and return flowering of 'Fuji' apple. Journal of American Pomological Society 57:169-173.
20 Kwon SI, Kim JH, Kim SA, Kwon YS, Lee J. 2019. 'RubyS', a small apple. HortScience 54:2067-2069.   DOI
21 Lee Y, Kweon HJ, Park MY, Lee D. 2019. Field assessment of macronutrients and nitrogen in apple leaves using a chlorophyll meter. HortTechnology 29:300-307.   DOI
22 Link H. 2000. Significance of flower and fruit thinning on fruit quality. Plant Growth Regulation 31:17-26.   DOI
23 McArtney S, Palmer JW, Adams HM. 1996. Crop loading studies with 'Royal Gala' and 'Braeburn' apples: Effect of time and level of hand thinning. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 24:401-407.   DOI
24 Peck G, McGuire M, IV Boudreau T, Stewart A. 2016. Crop load density affects 'York' apple juice and had cider quality. HortScience 51:1098-1102.   DOI
25 Meland M. 2009. Effects of different crop loads and thinning times on yield, fruit quality, and return bloom in Malus × domestica Borkh. 'Elstar'. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 84:117-121.   DOI
26 Musacchi S, Serra S. 2018. Apple fruit quality: Overview on pre-harvest factors. Scientia Horticulturae 234:409-430.   DOI
27 Neilsen GH, Neilsen D, Toivonen P, Herbert L. 2008. Annual bloom-time phosphorus fertigation affects soil phosphorus, apple tree phosphorus nutrition, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience 43:885-890.   DOI
28 Racsko J. 2006. Crop load, fruit thinning and their effects on fruit quality of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Journal of Agricultural Science 24:29-35.
29 Robinson TL, Lopez S. 2009. Crop load and nutrition affect Honeycrisp apple quality. New York Fruit Quarterly 17:24-28.
30 Robinson TL, Watkins CB. 2003. Crop load of Honeycrisp affects not only fruit size but also many quality attributes. New York Fruit Quarterly 11:7-10.
31 Samuoliene G, Viskeliene A, Sirtautas R, Kviklys D. 2016. Relationships between apple tree rootstock, crop-load, plant nutritional status and yield. Scientia Horticulturae 211:167-173.   DOI
32 Serra S, Leisso R, Giordani L, Kalcsits L, Musacchi S. 2016. Crop load influences fruit quality, nutritional balance, and return bloom in 'Honeycrisp' apple. HortScience 51:236-244.   DOI
33 Telias A, Hoover E, Rosen C, Bedford D, Cook D. 2006. The effect of calcium sprays and fruit thinning on bitter pit incidence and calcium content in 'Honeycrisp' apple. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29:1941-1957.   DOI
34 Yuri JA, Talice JG, Verdugo J, del Pozo A. 2011. Responses of fruit growth, quality, and productivity to crop load in apple cv. Ultra Red Gala/MM111. Scientia Horticulturae 127:305-312.   DOI
35 USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2019. Foreign agricultural service: 2019 apple update: Republic of Korea. Accessed in https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/south-korea-2019-apple-update on 8 December 2019.
36 Win NM, Yoo J, Kwon SI, Watkins CB, Kang IK. 2019. Characterization of fruit quality attributes and cell wall metabolism in 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)-treated 'Summer King' and 'Green Ball' apples during cold storage. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1513.
37 Yang X, Chen LS, Cheng L. 2021. Leaf photosynthesis and carbon metabolism adapt to crop load in 'Gala' apple trees. Horticulturae 7:47.