Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20210020

Impact of phase feeding: effects on the growth performance of sows and their litter characteristics  

Sureshkumar, Shanmugam (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University)
Kim, In Ho (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science / v.48, no.2, 2021 , pp. 265-272 More about this Journal
Abstract
A total of fourteen primiparous sows' (Landrace × Yorkshire) were used to determine the effects of two patterns of feed intake during early gestation on the growth performance and litter characteristics in sows. Daily feed intake from day 5 to 112 of gestation for parity 1 sows was 2.2 kg·d-1 of feed offered with the exception of seven sows who were offered 3.2 kg·d-1 from day 90 to 108 of gestation (TRT A) or 2.5 kg·d-1 (d 5 - 60) and 2 kg·d-1 (d 60 - 90) of feed with the exception of seven sows who were offered 3.5 kg·d-1 from day 90 to 108 of gestation (TRT B). The different feed intake patterns in early gestation did not have a significant effect on body weight, backfat thickness, or body condition score during, before, and after farrowing (p > 0.05) respectively. However, initial to d 60, backfat thickness difference was significantly improved by TRT B patterns of feed intake during early gestation. In addition, during the overall experiment, average daily feed intake was significantly enhanced for sows in the dietary TRT B group feed intake pattern (p = 0.0001). The fecal score during day 90 was significantly reduced (p = 0.0132) in sows fed with TRT B feed intake pattern. Litter size, litter survival rate, and initial weight showed no significant differences with different feed efficiency of gestating sows. In summary, the results indicate that the 2.5 kg·d-1 gestation intake pattern allowed gestating sows to obtain optimal performance.
Keywords
fecal score; feed intake; gestation; growth performance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 McNamara LB, Giblin L, Markham T, Stickland NC, Berry DP, O'Reilly JJ, Lynch PB, Kerry JP, Lawlor PG. 2011. Nutritional intervention during gestation alters growth, body composition and gene expression patterns in skeletal muscle of pig offspring. Animal 5:1195-1206.   DOI
2 Nichols GE, Gourley KM, DeRouchey JM, Woodworth JC, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Frobose HL. 2017. Validation of individual computerized sow feeding systems in lactation. Journal of Animal Science Abstract 95:187.
3 Quiniou N. 2014. Feeding the high potential sow: Implementation of some key concepts. Cashiers de I'IFIP 1:57-68.
4 Sureshkumar S, Baek DH, Kim IH. 2021. Influences of betaine supplementation on growth performance and fecal score in sows and their piglets fed a corn soybean meal-based diet. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:1-9.
5 Terlouw EMC, Lawrence AB, Illius AW. 1991. Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Animal Behaviour 42:981-991.   DOI
6 Thomas LL, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Woodworth JC, DeRouchey JM, Dritz SS. 2018. Effect of parity and stage of gestation on growth and feed efficiency of gestating sows. Journal of Animal Science 96:4327-4338.   DOI
7 Tummaruk P. 2013. Post-parturient disorders and backfat loss in tropical sows in relation to backfat thickness before farrowing and postpartum intravenous supportive treatment. Asian- Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26:171-177.   DOI
8 Weldon WC, Lewis AJ, Louis GF, Kovar JL, Miller PS. 1994. Postpartum hypophagia in primiparous sows II. Effects of feeding level during gestation and exogenous insulin on lactation feed intake, glucose tolerance, and epinephrinestimulated release of nonesterified fatty acids and glucose. Journal of Animal Science 72:395-403.   DOI
9 Young MG, Tokach MD, Aherne FX, Main RG, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL. 2004. Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance. Journal of Animal Science 82:3058-3070.   DOI
10 Barker DJ. 1998. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clinical Science 95:115-128.   DOI
11 Bee G. 2004. Effect of early gestation feeding, birth weight, and gender of progeny on muscle fiber characteristics of pigs at slaughter. Journal of Animal Science 82:826-836.   DOI
12 Bergeron R, Bolduc J, Ramonet Y, Meunier-Salaun MC, Robert S. 2000. Feeding motivation and stereotypies in pregnant sows fed increasing levels of fiber and/or food. Applied Animal Behavior Science 70:27-40.   DOI
13 Lawlor PG, Lynch PB. 2007. A review of factors influencing litter size in Irish sows. Irish Veterinary Journal 60:359-366.   DOI
14 Beyer M, Jentsch W, Kuhla S, Wittenburg H, Kreienbring F, Scholze H, Metges CC. 2007. Effects of dietary energy intake during gestation and lactation on milk yield and composition of first, second and fourth parity sows. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61:452-468.   DOI
15 Eissen JJ, Kanis E, Kemp B. 2000. Sow factors affecting voluntary feed intake during lactation. Livestock Production Science 64:147-165.   DOI
16 Foxcroft G, Beltranena E, Patterson J, Williams N, Pizzarro G. 2005. Physiological limits to maximizing sow productivity. p. 29-46. In: Proc. of 2005 London Swine Conf., Maximizing Sow Reproductive Efficiency, London, UK.
17 Li J, Xia H, Yao W, Wang T, Li J, Piao X, Thacker P, Wu G, Wang F. 2015. Effects of arginine supplementation during early gestation (day 1 to 30) on litter size and plasma metabolites in gilts and sows. Journal of Animal Science 93:5291-5303.   DOI
18 Hansen AV, Lauridsen C, Sorensen MT, Bach Knudsen KE, Theil PK. 2012. Effects of nutrient supply, plasma metabolites, an nutritional status of sows during transition on performance in the next lactation. Journal of Animal Science 90:466-480. doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3984.   DOI
19 Fan ZY, Yang XJ, Kim J, Menon D, Baidoo SK. 2016. Effects of dietary tryptophan: Lysine ratio on the reproductive performance of primiparous and multiparous lactating sows. Livestock Production Science 170:128-134.
20 Everts H, Blok MC, Kemp B, Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Smits CHM. 1995. Requirements of lactating sows (in Durch). CVB-Documentatierapport No. 13. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad, Netherlands.
21 Houde A, Methot S, Murphy B, Bordignon V, Palin M. 2010. Relationships between backfat thickness and reproductive efficiency of sows: A two-year trial involving two commercial herds fixing backfat thickness at breeding. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 90:429-435.   DOI
22 Lei XJ, Lee SI, Kim IH. 2018. Evaluation of three different patterns of feed intake during early lactation in lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 89:1129-1133.   DOI
23 Montagne L, Cavaney FS, Hanpson DJ, Lalles JP, Pluske JR. 2004. Effect of diet composition on post weaning colibacillosis in piglets. Journal of Animal Science 82:2364-2374.   DOI
24 Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Kemp B, Plagge JG, Vereijken PFG, den Hartog LA, Spoolder HAM, Verstegen MWA. 2004. Performance and individual feed intake characteristics of group-housed sows fed a nonstarch polysaccharides diet ad libitum during gestation over three parities. Journal of Animal Science 82:1246-1257.   DOI
25 Koketsu Y, Dial GD, Pettigrew JE, King VL. 1997. Influence of feed intake during individual weeks of lactation on reproductive performance of sows on commercial farms. Livestock Production Science 49:217-225.   DOI
26 Sclafani A, Kirchgessner A. 1986. The role of the medial hypothalamus in the control of food intake: An update. In Feeding Behavior Neural and Humoral Controls edited by Ritter RC, Ritter S, Barnes CD. p. 27. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.
27 Thingnes SL, Ekker AS, Gaustad AH, Framstad T. 2012. Ad libitum versus step-up feeding during late lactation: The effect on feed consumption, body composition and production performance in dry fed loose housed sows. Livestock Science 149:250-259.   DOI