Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200004

Digital image-based plant phenotyping: a review  

Omari, Mohammad Kamran (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Jayoung (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Faqeerzada, Mohammad Akbar (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Joshi, Rahul (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Park, Eunsoo (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Cho, Byoung-Kwan (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Science, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science / v.47, no.1, 2020 , pp. 119-130 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the current rapid growth and increase in the world's population, the demand for nutritious food and fibers and fuel will increase. Therefore, there is a serious need for the use of breeding programs with the full potential to produce high-yielding crops. However, existing breeding techniques are unable to meet the demand criteria even though genotyping techniques have significantly progressed with the discovery of molecular markers and next-generation sequencing tools, and conventional phenotyping techniques lag behind. Well-organized high-throughput plant phenotyping platforms have been established recently and developed in different parts of the world to address this problem. These platforms use several imaging techniques and technologies to acquire data for quantitative studies related to plant growth, yield, and adaptation to various types of abiotic or biotic stresses (drought, nutrient, disease, salinity, etc.). Phenotyping has become an impediment in genomics studies of plant breeding. In recent years, phenomics, an emerging domain that entails characterizing the full set of phenotypes in a given species, has appeared as a novel approach to enhance genomics data in breeding programs. Imaging techniques are of substantial importance in phenomics. In this study, the importance of current imaging technologies and their applications in plant phenotyping are reviewed, and their advantages and limitations in phenomics are highlighted.
Keywords
image analysis; phenotyping; phenomics; plant breeding;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Joshi R, Cho BK, Joshi R, Lohumi S, Faqeerzada MA, Amanah HZ, Lee J, Mo C, Lee H. 2019. Raman spectroscopic analysis to detect olive oil mixtures in argan oil. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:183-194.   DOI
2 Kakaly PF, Asner GP, Ollinger SV, Martin ME, Wessman CA. 2009. Characterizing canopy biochemistry from imaging spectroscopy and its application to ecosystem studies. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:78-91.
3 Kang YS, Ryu SC, Kim SH, Jun SR, Jang SH, Park JW, Song H. 2018. Yield prediction of Chinses cabbage (Brassicaceae) using broadband multispectral imagery mounted unmanned aerial system in the air and narrowband hyperspectral imagery on the ground. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 43:138-147.   DOI
4 Lee A, Kim SY, Hong SJ, Han YH, Choi Y, Kim M, Yun SK, Kim G. 2019. Phenotypic analysis of fruit crops water stress using infrared thermal imaging. Journal of Biosystem Engineering 44:87-94.   DOI
5 Golzarian MR, Frick RA, Rajendran K, Berger B, Roy S, Tester M, Lun DS. 2011. Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high throughput images of cereal plants. Plant Methods 7:1-2.   DOI
6 Lee YJ, Kim KD, Lee HS, Shin BS. 2018. Vision-based potato detection and counting system for yield monitoring. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 43:103-109.   DOI
7 Yin X, Struik PC, Kropff MJ. 2004. Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships. Trends in Plant Science 9:426-432.   DOI
8 Billiau K, Sprenger H, Schudoma C, Walther D, Kohl KI. 2012. Data management pipeline for plant phenotyping in a multisite project. Functional Plant Biology 39:948-957.   DOI
9 Barcelon EG, Tojo S, Watanabe K. 1999. Relating X-ray absorption and some quality characteristics of mango fruit (Mangiferaindica L). Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 47:3822-3825.   DOI
10 Basak JK, Qasim W, Okyere FG, Khan F, Lee YJ, Park J, Kim HT. 2019. Regression analysis to estimate morphology parameters of pepper plant in a controlled greenhouse system. Journal of Biosystem Engineering 44:57-68.   DOI
11 Busemeyer L, Mentrup D, Moller K, Wunder E, Alheit K, Hahn V, Maurer HP, Reif JC, Wurschum T, Muller J, Rahe F. 2013. Breed vision a multi-sensor platform for nondestructive field-based phenotyping in plant breeding. Sensors 13:2830-2847.   DOI
12 Cabera-Bosquet L, Crossa J, Von ZJ, Serret MD, Luis AJ. 2012. High-throughput phenotyping and genomic selection the frontiers of crop breeding converge F. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54:312-320.   DOI
13 Chaerle L, Lenk S, Leinonen I, Jones HG, Van Der SD, Buschmann C. 2009. Multi-sensor plant imaging towards the development of stress-catalog. Journal of Biotechnology 4:1152-1167.   DOI
14 Ning XF, Gong YJ, Chen YL, Li H. 2018. Construction of a ginsenoside content predicting model based on hyperspectral imaging. Journal of Biosystem Engineering 43:369-378.   DOI
15 Chen M, Hofestadt R, Chen D. 2014. Approaches in integrative bioinformatics. pp. 299-333. Bridging genomics and phenomics Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany.
16 De Smet I, White PJ, Bengough AG, Dupuy L, Parizot B, Casimiro I, Hdidstra R, Laskowski M, Lepetit M, Hochholdinger F, Draye X. 2012. Analyzing lateral root development how to move forward. The Plant Cell 1:15-20.   DOI
17 De Vylder J, Vandenbussche F, Hu Y, Philips W, Van Der SD. 2012. Rosette tracker an open image analysis tool for automatic quantification of genotype effects. Plant Physiology 160:1149-1159.   DOI
18 Li L, Zhang Q, Huang D. 2014. A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors 14:20078-20111.   DOI
19 Maxwell K, Johnson GN. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51:659-668.   DOI
20 Munns R, James RA, Sirault XR, Furbank RT, Jones HG. 2010. New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 61:3499-3507.   DOI
21 Paproki A, Sirult X, Berry S, Furbank R, Fripp J. 2012. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biology 12:1-63.   DOI
22 Pieruschka R, Poorter H. 2012. Phenotyping plants genes phenes and machines. Functional Plant Biology 39:813-820.   DOI
23 Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. 2012. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications 3:1-7.
24 Sankaran S, Khot LR, Espinoza CZ, Jarolmasjed S, Sathuvalli VR, Vandemark GJ, Miklas PN, Carter AH, Pumphrey MO, Knowles NR, Pabek MJ. 2015. A review of low-altitude high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping. European Journal of Agronomy 70:12-23.
25 Seo Y, Lee H, Bae HJ, Park E, Lim HS, Kim MS, Cho BK. 2019. Optimized multivariate analysis for the discrimination of cucumber green mosaic mottle virus-infected watermelon seeds based on spectral imaging. Journal of Biosystem Engineering 44:95-102.   DOI
26 Siebeck K, Von CS, Badger M, Furbank RT. 1997. Expressing an RbcS antisense gene in transgenic flaveria bidentis leads to an increased quantum requirement for CO2 fixed in photosystems I and II. Plant Physiology 115:1163-1174.   DOI
27 Egea G, Padilla-Diaz CM, Martinez J, Fernandez JE, Perez-Ruiz M. 2017. Assessing a crop water stress index derived from aerial thermal imaging and infrared thermometry in super-high density olive orchards. Agriculture Water Management 187:210-221.   DOI
28 Dhondt S, Wuyts N, Inze D. 2013. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping the best is yet to come. Trends in Plant Science 18:428-439.   DOI
29 Donis-Gonzalez IR, Guyer DE, Pease A. 2012. Application of response surface methodology to systematically optimize image quality in computer tomography a case study using fresh chestnuts (Castanea spp). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 87:94-107.   DOI
30 Donis-Gonzalez IR, Guyer DE, Pease A. 2016. Postharvest noninvasive assessment of undesirable fibrous tissue in fresh processing carrots using computer tomography images. Journal of Food Engineering 190:154-166.   DOI
31 Garcia-Tejero I, Duran-Zuazo VH, Arriaga J, Hernandez A, Velez LM, Muriel-Fernandez JL. 2012. Approach to assess infrared thermal imaging of almond trees under water stress conditions. Fruits 67:463-474.   DOI
32 Akhter T, Ali M, Cha J, Park SJ, Jang G, Yang KW, Kim HJ. 2018. development of a data acquisition system for the long term monitoring of plum (Japanese apricot) farm environment and soil. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 43:426-439.   DOI
33 Araus JL, Cairns JE. 2014. Field high-throughput phenotyping the new crop breeding frontier. Trends in Plant Science 19:52-61.   DOI
34 Badr A, Sayed-Ahmed H, El-Shanshouri A, Watson LE. 2002. Ancestors of white clover (Trifolium Repens L) as revealed by isozyme polymorphism. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106:143-48.   DOI
35 Fiorani F, Schurr U. 2013. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64:267-291.   DOI
36 Furbank RT, Tester M. 2011. Phenomics-technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science 16:635-644.   DOI
37 Garcia-Tejero I, Duran-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernandez JL, Jimenez-Bocanegra JA. 2011. Linking canopy temperature and trunk diameter fluctuations with other physiological water status tools for irrigation scheduling citrus orchards. Functional Plant Biology 38:1-12.   DOI
38 Garcia-Tejero IF, Costa JM, Egipto R, Lima RSN, Duran VH, Lopes C, Chaves MM. 2016. Thermal data to monitor cropwater status in irrigated Mediterranean viticulture. Agriculture Water Management 176:80-90.   DOI
39 Tackenberg O. 2007. A new method for nondestructive measurement of biomass growth rates vertical biomass distribution and dry matter content based on digital image analysis. Annuals of Botany 99:777-783.   DOI
40 Baker NR. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59:89-113.   DOI
41 Taghvaein S, Chavez J, Hansen H. 2012. Infrared thermometry to estimate crop water stress index and water use of irrigated maize in northeastern Colorado. Remote Sensing 4:3619-3637.   DOI
42 Tardieu F, Tuberosa R. 2010. Dissection and modeling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Biology 13:206-212.   DOI
43 Topp CN, Lyer-Pascuzzi AS, Anderson JT, Lee CR, Zurek PR, Symonova O, Zheng Y, Bucksch A, Mileyko Y, Galkovskyi T, Moore BT. 2013. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science 110:E1695-E1704.   DOI
44 Vadivambal R, Jayas DS. 2011. Application of thermal imaging in agriculture and food industry- a review. Food and Bioprocess Technology 4:186-199.   DOI
45 Weigel D, Mott R. 2009. The 101 genome project for Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biology 10:107.   DOI
46 White JW, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Bronson KF, Coffelt TA, Conley MM, Feldmann KA, French AN, Heun JT, Hunsaker DJ, Jenks MA. 2012. Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Research 133:101-112.   DOI
47 Yang W, Duan L, Chen G, Xiong L, Liu Q. 2013. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16:180-187.   DOI
48 Sozzani R, Busch W, Spalding EP, Benfey PN. 2014. Advanced imaging techniques for the study of plant growth and development. Trends in Plant Science 19:304-310.   DOI
49 Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink J. 2009. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Science 49:1-12.   DOI
50 Granier C, Denis V. 2014. Phenotyping and beyond modeling the relationships between traits. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 18:96-102.   DOI
51 IPPN (International Plant Phenotyping Network). 2020. Plant phenotyping. Accessed in http://www.plantphenomics.com on 7 February 2020.
52 Jones HG. 2004. Irrigation scheduling advantage and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:2427-2436.   DOI