Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170023

Evaluation of rapeseed meal as a protein source to replace soybean meal in growing pigs  

Kim, Jong Keun (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
Lei, Xin Jian (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
Lee, Sang In (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
Lee, Il Seok (Department of General Education, Dankook University)
Kim, In Ho (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science / v.44, no.2, 2017 , pp. 235-243 More about this Journal
Abstract
A total of 112 crossbred pigs [(Yorkshire ${\times}$ Landrace) ${\times}$ Duroc] with an average body weight (BW) of $27.98{\pm}1.28kg$ were used to evaluate the effects of replacing soybean meal (SBM) with rapeseed meal (RSM) as a source of protein on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and fecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs. The pigs were blocked and stratified based on BW into one of four dietary treatments in a 6-week trial. Each treatment consisted of 7 replicate pens with 4 pigs per pen (2 barrows and 2 gilts). Treatments were 1) maize-SBM based diet, 2) diet containing 2% RSM, 3) diet containing 4% RSM, and 4) diet containing 6% RSM. Supplementation with RSM resulted in no differences in growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and noxious gas emission, as compared with SBM supplementation during the experimental period (p > 0.05). Pigs fed with increased dietary RSM (0, 2, 4, and 6% of feed) had linear decreases in average daily gain (ADG) (p = 0.010) and nitrogen digestibility (p = 0.036) and a linear increase in blood creatinine concentration. In conclusion, RSM fed pigs had no detrimental effects on their growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and fecal noxious gas emissions, as compared with SBM fed pigs. Thus, RSM is a good alternative to SBM as a protein source in growing pigs' diets.
Keywords
growing pig; growth performance; nutrient digestibility; rapeseed meal; soybean meal;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sanjayan N, Heo JM, Nyachoti CM. 2014. Nutrient digestibility and growth performance of pigs fed diets with different levels of canola meal from Brassica napus black and Brassica juncea yellow. Journal of Animal Science 92:3895-3905.   DOI
2 Sauer WC, Ozimek L. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. A review. Livestock Production Science 15:367-388.   DOI
3 Seneviratne RW, Young MG, Beltranena E, Goonewardene LA, Newkirk RW, Zijlstra RT. 2010. The nutritional value of expeller-pressed canola meal for grower-finisher pigs. Journal of Animal Science 88:2073-2083.   DOI
4 Siljander-Rasi H, Valaja J, Alaviuhkola T, Rantamäki P, Tupasela T. 1996. Replacing soya bean meal with heat-treated, low-glucosinolate rapeseed meal does not affect the performance of growing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology 60:1-12.   DOI
5 Slominski BA, Campbell LD, Guenter W. 1994. Carbohydrates and dietary fiber components of yellow- and brown-seeded canola. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 42:704-707.   DOI
6 Woyengo TA, Dickson T, Sands JS, Nyachoti CM. 2009. Nutrient digestibility in finishing pigs fed phytase-supplemented barley-based diets containing soybean meal or canola meal as a protein source. Archives of Animal Nutrition 63:137-148.   DOI
7 Xie P, Huang H, Dong X, Zou XT. 2012. Evaluation of extruded or unextruded double-low rapeseed meal and multienzymes preparation in pigs' nutrition during the finishing phase of production. Italian Journal of Animal Science 11:184-189.
8 Cerisuelo A, Torres A, Lainez M, Moset V. 2012. Increasing energy and lysine in diets for growing-finishing pigs in hot environmental conditions: Consequences on performance, digestibility, slurry composition, and gas emission. Journal of Animal Science 90:1489-1498.   DOI
9 Corino C, Baldi A, Bontempo V. 1991. Influence of low-glucosinolate rapeseed meal on performance and thyroid hormone status of heavy pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology 35:321-331.   DOI
10 Fang ZF, Peng F, Liu ZL, Liu YG. 2007. Responses of non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on digestibility and performance of growing pigs fed a diet based on corn, soya bean meal and Chinese double-low rapeseed meal. Journal Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 91:361-368.   DOI
11 Fernandez J, Jorgensen JN. 1986. Digestibility and absorption of nutrients as affected by fiber content in the diet of the pig. Quantitative aspects. Livestock Production Science 15:53-71.   DOI
12 Jo JK, Ingale SL, Kim JS, Kim YW, Kim KH, Lohakare JD, Lee JH, Chae BJ. 2012. Effects of exogenous enzyme supplementation to corn- and soybean meal-based or complex diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood metabolites in growing pigs. Journal Animal Science 90:3041-3048.   DOI
13 Landero, JL, Beltranena E, Cervantes M, Morales A, Zijlstra RT. 2011. The effect of feeding solvent-extracted canola meal on growth performance and diet nutrient digestibility in weaned pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology 170:136-140.   DOI
14 Liu Y, Song M, Maison T, Stein HH. 2014. Effects of protein concentration and heat treatment on concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy and on amino acid digestibility in four sources of canola meal fed to growing pigs. Journal Animal Science 92:4466-4477.   DOI
15 O'Shea CJ, Sweeney T, Lynch MB, Gahan DA, Callan JJ, O'Doherty JV. 2010. Effect of b-glucans contained in barleyand oat-based diets and exogenous enzyme supplementation on gastrointestinal fermentation of finisher pigs and subsequent manure odor and ammonia emissions. Journal of Animal Science 88:1411-1420.   DOI
16 McDonnell P, O'Shea C, Figat S, O'Doherty JV. 2010. Influence of incrementally substituting dietary soya bean meal for rapeseed meal on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, growth performance and ammonia emissions from growing-finishing pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 64: 412-424.   DOI
17 NRC 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
18 O'Doherty JV, Murphy D, McGlynn SG. 2001. The effects of expander processing and by-product inclusion levels on performance of grower-finisher pigs. Animal Science Journal 73:479-487.   DOI
19 Park SK, Cho ES, Jeong YD, Sa SJ. 2016a. Digestibility of nitrogen and dry matter of oilseed meals and distillers dried grains supplemented in swine diets. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:769-776.
20 Park SW, Kim BH, Kim YH, Kim SN, Jang KB, Kim YH, Park JC, Song MH, Oh SN. 2016b. Nutrition and feed approach according to pig physiology. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:750-760.
21 Aarnink AJA, Verstegen MWA. 2007. Nutrition, key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production. Livestock Science 109:194-203.   DOI
22 AOAC 2012. Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD.
23 Zdunczyk Z, Jankowski J, Juskiewicz J, Mikulski D, Slominski BA. 2013. Effect of different dietary levels of low-glucosinolate rapeseed (canola) meal and non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on growth performance and gut physiology of growing turkeys. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 93:353-362.   DOI
24 Bindelle J, Buldgen A, Delacollette M, Wavreille J, Agneessens R, Destain JP, Leterme P. 2009. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiber on in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs as reflected by in vivo fermentation and nitrogen incorporation by fecal bacteria. Journal of Animal Science 87:583-593.   DOI
25 Bourdon D, Aumaitre A. 1990. Low-glucosinolate rapeseeds and rapeseed meals: Effect of technological treatments on chemical composition, digestible energy content and feeding value for growing pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology 30:175-191.   DOI