Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2003.36.spc1.093

SEASONAL AND UNIVERSAL TIME VARIATIONS OF THE AU, AL AND DST INDICES  

AHN BYUNG-HO (Department of Earth Science Kyungpook National University)
MOON GA-HEE (Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society / v.36, no.spc1, 2003 , pp. 93-99 More about this Journal
Abstract
Various attempts have been made to explain the: pronounced seasonal and universal time (UT) variations of geomagnetic indices. As one of such attempts, we analyze the hourly-averaged auroral electroject indices obtained during the past 20 years. The AU and AL indices maximize during summer and equinoctial months, respectively. By normalizing the contribution of the solar conductivity enhancement to the AU index, or to the eastward electrojet, it is found that the AU also follows the same semiannual variation pattern of the AL index, suggesting that the electric field is the main modulator of the semiannual magnetic variation. The fact that the variation pattern of the yearly-mean AU index follows the mirror image of the AL index provides another indication that the electric field is the main modulator of magnetic disturbance. The pronounced UT variations of the auroral electrojet indices are also noted. To determine the magnetic activity dependence, the probability of recording a given activity level of AU and AL during each UT is examined. The UT variation of the AL index, thus obtained, shows a maximum at around 1200-1800 UT and a minimum around 0000-0800 UT particularly during winter. It is closely associated with the rotation of the geomagnetic pole around the rotational axis, which results in the change of the solar-originated ionospheric conductivity distribution over the polar region. On the other hand the UT variation is prominent during disturbed periods, indicating that the latitudinal mismatch between the AE stations and the auroral electrojet belt is responsible for it. Although not as prominent as the AL index, the probability distribution of the AU also shows two UT peaks. We confirm that the Dst index shows more prominent seasonal variation than the AE indices. However, the UT variation of the Dst index is only noticeable during the main phase of a magnetic storm. It is a combined result of the uneven distribution of the Dst stations and frequent developments of the partial ring current and substorm wedge current preferentially during the main phase.
Keywords
Geomagnetic activity index; AU; AL; AE; Dst;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Richmond, A. D. 1995, Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, Vol. 2, CRE
2 Robinson, R. M., & Vondrak, R. R. 1984, Measuremerits of E region ionization and conductivity produced by solar illumination at high latitude, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 3951   DOI
3 Russell, C. T., & McPherron, R. L. 1973, Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 92   DOI
4 Svalgaard, L. 2002, The semi-annual variation of geomagnetic activity, EOS, Trans., AGU, 83(47), F1236
5 Svalgaard, L. 1977, Geomagnetic activity: dependence on solar wind parameters, in Coronal Holes and High Speed Wind Streams, ed. By Zirker, J. B., Colorado Assoc. Univ. Press, Boulder, CO, p. 371
6 Takalo, J., &. Mursula, M. 2001, A model for the diurnal universal time variation of the Dst index, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 10905   DOI
7 Bohlin, J. D. 1977, Extreme-ultraviolet observations of coronal holes, Sol. Phys., 51, 377   DOI
8 Chapman, S., & Bartels, J. 1940, Geomagnetism, Vol. 1, Oxford Univ. Press
9 Cliver, E. W., Kamide, Y., & Ling, A. G. 2000, Mountains versus valleys: Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2413   DOI
10 Cliver, E. W., Svalgaard, L., & Ling, A. G. 2002, Evidence for a dominant Russell-McPherron/ Rosenberg-Coleman origin of the semiannual variations of geomagnetic activity in 1954 and 1996, EOS, Trans., AGU, 83(47), F1204
11 Cortie, A. L. 1912, Sunspots and terrestrial magnetic phenomena, 1898-1911: The cause of the annual variation in magnetic disturbances, MNRAS, 73, 52   DOI
12 Allen, J. H., & Kroehl, H. W. 1975, Spatial and temporal distributions of magnetic effects of auroral electrojets as derived from AE indice, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 3607
13 Gizler, V. A., Kuznetsov, B. M., Sergeev, V. A., & Troshichev, O. A. 1976, The sources of the polar cap and low latitude bay-like disturbances during substorms, Planet. Space Sci., 24, 1133   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hajkowicz, L. A. 1998, Longitudinal(UT) effect in the onset of auroral disturbances over two solar cycles as deduced from the AE-index, Ann. Geophys., 16, 1573   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kamide, Y., & Kokubun, S. 1996, Two-component auroral electrojet: importance for substorm studies, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13027   DOI
16 Bartels, J. 1925, Eine universelle Tagsperiode der erdmagnetischen Aktivitat, J.,Meteorol. Z., 42, 147
17 McIntosh, D. H. 1959, On the annual variation of magnetic disturbance, Phil. Trans. R. S. London, 251, 525   DOI
18 Ahn, B.-H., Kroehl, H. W., Kamide, Y., & Kihn, E. A. 2000b, Seasonal and solar cycle variations of the auroral electrojet indices, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 1301   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ahn, B.-H., Emery, B. A., Kroehl, H. W., & Kamide, Y. 1999, Climatological characteristics of the auroral ionosphere in terms of electric field and ionospheric conductance, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 10031   DOI
20 Ahn, B.-H., Kroehl, H. W., Kamide, Y., & Kihn, E. A. 2000a, Universal time variations of the auroral electrojet indices, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 267   DOI
21 Ahn, B.-H, Moon, Ga-Hee, Sun, W., Akasofu, S.-I., Chen, G. X., & Park, Y. D. 2002, Universal time variation of the Dst and the relationship between the cumulative AL and Dst indices during geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res, 107(Al1), 1409   DOI