Effect of lower facial height and anteroposterior lip position on esthetic preference for Korean silhouette profiles |
Seo, Kyung-Hyun
(Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
So, Deuk-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) Song, Kyeong-Tae (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) Choi, Sung-Kwon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) Kang, Kyung-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) |
1 | Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:180-7. DOI |
2 | Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 1973;43:34-40. |
3 | Macias Gago AB, Romero Maroto M, Crego A. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:335-9. DOI |
4 | Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:328-38. DOI |
5 | Ioi H, Shimomura T, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL. Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:490-5. DOI |
6 | Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthod 2005;75:326-32. |
7 | Murakami T, Kataoka T, Tagawa J, Yamashiro T, Kamioka H. Antero-posterior and vertical facial type variations influence the aesthetic preference of the antero-posterior lip positions. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:414-21. DOI |
8 | Coleman GG, Lindauer SJ, Tufekci E, Shroff B, Best AM. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:36-42. DOI |
9 | Hier LA, Evans CA, BeGole EA, Giddon DB. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod 1999;69:231-8. |
10 | The Council of the Faculty of Orthodontics. Textbook of orthodontics. 3rd ed. Seoul: Jisung; 2014. |
11 | Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002;72:72-80. |
12 | James RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:265-76. DOI |
13 | Baik HS, Jeon JM, Lee HJ. A study of facial soft tissue of Korean adults with normal occlusion using a three-dimensional laser scanner. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:14-29. |
14 | Hockley A, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:161-8. DOI |
15 | Nomura M, Motegi E, Hatch JP, Gakunga PT, Ng'ang'a PM, Rugh JD, et al. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4 Suppl):S87-95. DOI |
16 | Jacobson A, Jacobson RL. Radiographic cephalometry: from basics to 3D imaging. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2006. |
17 | The Korean Association of Orthodontists. Lateral cephalometric analysis of Korean adult normal samples. Seoul: The Korean Association of Orthodontists; 1997. |
18 | Tsang ST, McFadden LR, Wiltshire WA, Pershad N, Baker AB. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:66-72. DOI |
19 | Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod 1993;63:175-82. |
20 | Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-84. DOI |
21 | Shelly AD, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Fridrich KL, et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:630-7. DOI |
22 | Bonetti GA, Alberti A, Sartini C, Parenti SI. Patients' self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness before and after exposure to facial photographs. Angle Orthod 2011;81:517-24. DOI |
23 | Franzoi SL, Herzog ME. Judging physical attractiveness: what body aspects do we use? Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1987;13:19-33. DOI |
24 | Mueser KT, Grau BW, Sussman S, Rosen AJ. You're only as pretty as you feel: facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;46:469-78. DOI |
25 | Maple JR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Larsen PE, Shanker S. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:690-6; quiz 801. DOI |
26 | Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod 1958;44:1-25. DOI |
27 | Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:464-71. DOI |
![]() |