Three-dimensional evaluation of the transfer accuracy of a bracket jig fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing to the anterior dentition: An in vitro study |
Park, Jae-Hyun
(Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Kim, Seong-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Kim, Su-Jung (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) Lee, Kee-Joon (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Nelson, Gerald (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) |
1 | Xue C, Xu H, Guo Y, Xu L, Dhami Y, Wang H, et al. Accurate bracket placement using a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing-guided bonding device: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;157:269-77. DOI |
2 | Kwon SI, Lee KJ, inventor; CENOS assignee. Bracket jig system for positioning an orthodontic bracket. Korea patent KR 10-2163625. 2020 Sep 29. |
3 | Fillion D. Clinical advantages of the Orapix-straight wire lingual technique. Int Orthod 2010;8:125-51. |
4 | Fillion D. Lingual straightwire treatment with the Orapix system. J Clin Orthod 2011;45:488-97; quiz 515. |
5 | Kim J, Chun YS, Kim M. Accuracy of bracket positions with a CAD/CAM indirect bonding system in posterior teeth with different cusp heights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:298-307. DOI |
6 | Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975;68:554-63. DOI |
7 | Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589-99. DOI |
8 | Wan Hassan WN, Yusoff Y, Mardi NA. Comparison of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by 3-dimensional printing and conventional stone models with different degrees of crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:209-18. DOI |
9 | Gelin E, Seidel L, Bruwier A, Albert A, Charavet C. Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Orthod 2020;50:373-82. DOI |
10 | Dietrich CA, Ender A, Baumgartner S, Mehl A. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies. Angle Orthod 2017;87:782-7. DOI |
11 | Gyllenhaal KA. Accuracy of two indirect bonding transfer methods: a three-dimensional, in-vivo analysis [Master's thesis]. Minnesota: University of Minnesota; 2015. |
12 | Pottier T, Brient A, Turpin YL, Chauvel B, Meuric V, Sorel O, et al. Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:3889-97. DOI |
13 | Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance. Br J Orthod 1979;6:125-43. DOI |
14 | Koo BC, Chung CH, Vanarsdall RL. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:346-51. DOI |
15 | Aguirre MJ, King GJ, Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1982;82:269-76. DOI |
16 | Hodge TM, Dhopatkar AA, Rock WP, Spary DJ. A randomized clinical trial comparing the accuracy of direct versus indirect bracket placement. J Orthod 2004;31:132-7. DOI |
17 | Thomas RG. Indirect bonding: simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod 1979;13:93-106. |
18 | Park KH, Choi JY, Kim KA, Kim SJ, Chung KR, Kim SH. Critical issues concerning biocreative strategy in contemporary temporary skeletal anchorage device orthodontics: a narrative review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2021;24 Suppl 1:39-47. |
19 | Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:108-15. DOI |
20 | Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance. Explained and compared. J Clin Orthod 1976;10:174-95. |
21 | Castilla AE, Crowe JJ, Moses JR, Wang M, Ferracane JL, Covell DA Jr. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2014;84:607-14. DOI |
22 | Kalange JT. Indirect bonding: a comprehensive review of the advantages. World J Orthod 2004;5:301-7. |
23 | Wendl B, Droschl H, Muchitsch P. Indirect bonding--a new transfer method. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:100-7. DOI |
24 | Lee MS. Indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets: an evaluation of transfer accuracy and reliability [Master's thesis]. Minnesota: University of Minnesota; 2014. |
25 | Seo H. Accuracy of indirect bracket bonding via virtual setup and 3D printing [Master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2016. |
26 | Niu Y, Zeng Y, Zhang Z, Xu W, Xiao L. Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2021;91:67-73. DOI |
27 | Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978; 74:62-78. DOI |
28 | Koch PJ. Measuring the accuracy of a computeraided design and computer-aided manufacturingbased indirect bonding tray. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;158:315. DOI |