Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.4.260

Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the midpalatal suture region to facilitate orthodontic mini-implant placement  

Oh, Song-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Sae Rom (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Kim, Seong-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Hwang, Eui-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Nelson, Gerald (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.51, no.4, 2021 , pp. 260-269 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To identify the most favorable sites that optimize the initial stability and survival rate of orthodontic mini-implants, this study measured hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the median and paramedian regions of the palate using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and determined possible sex- and age-related differences in these thicknesses. Methods: The study sample comprised CBCT images of 189 healthy subjects. The sample was divided into four groups according to age. A grid area was set for the measurement of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the palate. Vertical lines were marked at intervals of 0, 1.5, and 3.0 mm lateral to the midpalatal suture, while horizontal lines were marked at 2-mm intervals up to 24 mm from the posterior margin of the incisive foramen. Measurements were made at 65 points of intersection between the horizontal and vertical lines. Results: The palatal hard tissue thickness decreased from the anterior to the posterior region, with a decrease in the medial-to-lateral direction in the middle and posterior regions. While the soft tissue was rather thick around the lateral aspects of the palatal arch, it formed a constant layer that was only 1-2-mm thick throughout the palate. Statistically significant differences were observed according to sex and age. Conclusions: The anterolateral palate as well as the midpalatal suture seem to be the most favorable sites for insertion of orthodontic mini-implants. The thickness of the palate differed by age and sex; these differences should be considered while planning the placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Keywords
Cone-beam computed tomography; Midpalatal suture; Thickness; Mini-implant;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Janssen KI, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Sandham A. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:75-88.
2 Seo YJ, Chung KR, Kim SH, Nelson G. Camouflage treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with asymmetry using a bone-borne rapid maxillary expander. Angle Orthod 2015;85:322-34.   DOI
3 Kyung SH. A study on the bone thickness of midpalatal suture area for miniscrew insertion. Korean J Orthod 2004;34:63-70.
4 Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P, Glatzmaier J. The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the orthosystem. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:410-6.   DOI
5 Choi SH, Shi KK, Cha JY, Park YC, Lee KJ. Nonsurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion results in acceptable stability in young adults. Angle Orthod 2016;86:713-20.   DOI
6 Chen YJ, Chang HH, Lin HY, Lai EH, Hung HC, Yao CC. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1188-96.   DOI
7 Kim JS, Kim SH, Kook YA, Chung KR, Nelson G. Analysis of lingual en masse retraction combining a C-lingual retractor and a palatal plate. Angle Orthod 2011;81:662-9.   DOI
8 Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir A, Haghanifar S, Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir M, Rahmati-Kamel M. Individual scoring and mapping of hard and soft tissues of the anterior hard palate for orthodontic miniscrew insertion. J Investig Clin Dent 2017;8:e12186.   DOI
9 Cassetta M, Sofan AA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:e245-52.   DOI
10 Yadav S, Sachs E, Vishwanath M, Knecht K, Upadhyay M, Nanda R, et al. Gender and growth variation in palatal bone thickness and density for miniimplant placement. Prog Orthod 2018;19:43.   DOI
11 Yao CC, Chang HH, Chang JZ, Lai HH, Lu SC, Chen YJ. Revisiting the stability of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. J Formos Med Assoc 2015;114:1122-8.   DOI
12 Baumgaertel S. Hard and soft tissue considerations at mini-implant insertion sites. J Orthod 2014;41 Suppl 1:S3-7.   DOI
13 Kim YT, Lee JH, Jeong SN. Three-dimensional observations of the incisive foramen on cone-beam computed tomography image analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2020;50:48-55.   DOI
14 Bernhart T, Freudenthaler J, Dortbudak O, Bantleon HP, Watzek G. Short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. A clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:624-31.   DOI
15 Lee KJ, Park YC, Park JY, Hwang WS. Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:830-9.   DOI
16 Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4 Suppl):S74-81.   DOI
17 Celenk-Koca T, Erdinc AE, Hazar S, Harris L, English JD, Akyalcin S. Evaluation of miniscrew-supported rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2018;88:702-9.   DOI
18 Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park HD, Kim DH, Park YC. Softtissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:177-82.   DOI
19 Keles A, Erverdi N, Sezen S. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage. Angle Orthod 2003;73:471-82.
20 Lyu X, Guo J, Chen L, Gao Y, Liu L, Pu L, et al. Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2020;90:516-23.   DOI
21 Bjoerk A, Krebs A, Solow B. A method for epidemiological registration of malocclusion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:27-41.   DOI
22 Ryu JH, Park JH, Vu Thi Thu T, Bayome M, Kim Y, Kook YA. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:207-12.   DOI
23 Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH. Larsen's human embryology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2015.
24 Chhatwani S, Rose-Zierau V, Haddad B, Almuzian M, Kirschneck C, Danesh G. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study. Head Face Med 2019;15:9.   DOI
25 Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage--a clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:65-70.   DOI