Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.4.205

Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits  

Kim, Junghan (Graduate School, The Catholic University of Korea)
Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Bayome, Mohamed (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University)
Park, Jae Hyun (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University)
Lee, Won (Department of Dentistry, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Choi, Hojae (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University)
Abbas, Noha H. (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.49, no.4, 2019 , pp. 205-213 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. Methods: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups. Results: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts. Conclusions: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control.
Keywords
Histology; Corticotomy; Tooth movement; Root resorption;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Igarashi K, Mitani H, Adachi H, Shinoda H. Anchorage and retentive effects of a bisphosphonate (AHBuBP) on tooth movements in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:279-89.   DOI
2 Iseri H, Kisnisci R, Bzizi N, Tuz H. Rapid canine retraction and orthodontic treatment with dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:533-41; quiz 625.   DOI
3 Liou EJ, Huang CS. Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:372-82.   DOI
4 Gantes B, Rathbun E, Anholm M. Effects on the periodontium following corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Case reports. J Periodontol 1990;61:234-8.   DOI
5 Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:331-9.
6 Suya H. Corticotomy in orthodontics. In: Hosl E, Baldauf A, eds. Mechanical and biological basics in orthodontic therapy. Heidelberg: Huthig Buch Verlag; 1991. p. 207-26.
7 Kook YA, Lee W, Kim SH, Chung KR. Corticotomyassisted space closure in adult patients with missing lower molars. J Clin Orthod 2013;47:85-95; quiz 139.
8 McBride MD, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Dechow PC, Buschang PH. How does the amount of surgical insult affect bone around moving teeth? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:S92-9.   DOI
9 Mostafa YA, Mohamed Salah Fayed M, Mehanni S, ElBokle NN, Heider AM. Comparison of corticotomyfacilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:570-7.   DOI
10 Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, Chartres I, Liu Y, Thant LM, et al. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res 2010;89:1135-41.   DOI
11 Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:639-48.   DOI
12 Cassetta M, Altieri F, Pandolfi S, Giansanti M. The combined use of computer-guided, minimally invasive, flapless corticotomy and clear aligners as a novel approach to moderate crowding: a case report. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:130-41.   DOI
13 Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, et al. Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 2016;95:1003-9.   DOI
14 Ruso S, Campbell PM, Rossmann J, Opperman LA, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Bone response to buccal tooth movements-with and without flapless alveolar decortication. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:613-23.   DOI
15 Swapp A, Campbell PM, Spears R, Buschang PH. Flapless cortical bone damage has no effect on medullary bone mesial to teeth being moved. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:547-58.   DOI
16 Lindskog-Stokland B, Hansen K, Ekestubbe A, Wennstrom JL. Orthodontic tooth movement into edentulous ridge areas--a case series. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:277-85.   DOI
17 Nagaraj K, Upadhyay M, Yadav S. Titanium screw anchorage for protraction of mandibular second molars into first molar extraction sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:583-91.   DOI
18 Santos PBDD, Herrera Sanches FS, Ferreira MC, de Almeida ALPF, Janson G, Garib D. Movement of mandibular molar into edentulous alveolar ridge: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:907-13.   DOI
19 Kim T, Handa A, Iida J, Yoshida S. RANKL expression in rat periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic force. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:244-50.   DOI
20 Yu JY, Lee W, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim Y, Kook YA. Histologic effects of intentional-socket-assisted orthodontic movement in rabbits. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:207-17.   DOI
21 Chen YW, Wang HC, Gao LH, Liu C, Jiang YX, Qu H, et al. Osteoclastogenesis in local alveolar bone in early decortication-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153937.   DOI
22 Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:771-85.   DOI
23 Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, et al. Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:958-67.   DOI
24 Buschang PH. Surgically facilitated orthodontics: what does the evidence say? In: Kapila SD, Goonewardene M, Kim-Berman H, Koster KY, eds. Interdisciplinary therapy: using contemporary approaches for complex cases. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 2016. p. 135-65.
25 Aboul-Ela SM, El-Beialy AR, El-Sayed KM, Selim EM, El-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:252-9.   DOI
26 Roberts WE. Bone tissue interface. Int J Oral Implantol 1988;5:71-4.
27 Mapara M, Thomas BS, Bhat KM. Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:111-8.   DOI
28 Owen KM, Campbell PM, Feng JQ, Dechow PC, Buschang PH. Elevation of a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap alone accelerates orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:49-57.   DOI
29 Castaneda S, Largo R, Calvo E, Rodriguez-Salvanes F, Marcos ME, Diaz-Curiel M, et al. Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:34-41.   DOI
30 Chan E, Dalci O, Petocz P, Papadopoulou AK, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: part 26. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:204-13.   DOI