Song, Han-Sol
(Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Choi, Sung-Hwan (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) Cha, Jung-Yul (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) Lee, Kee-Joon (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) Yu, Hyung-Seog (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) |
1 | Jacobs JD, Sinclair PM. Principles of orthodontic mechanics in orthognathic surgery cases. Am J Orthod 1983;84:399-407. DOI |
2 | Tompach PC, Wheeler JJ, Fridrich KL. Orthodontic considerations in orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1995;10:97-107. |
3 | Sabri R. Orthodontic objectives in orthognathic surgery: state of the art today. World J Orthod 2006;7:177-91. |
4 | Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, Nanda R. "Surgery first" skeletal Class III correction using the Skeletal Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod 2009;43:97-105. |
5 | Villegas C, Uribe F, Sugawara J, Nanda R. Expedited correction of significant dentofacial asymmetry using a "surgery first" approach. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:97-103; quiz 105. |
6 | Choi SH, Hwang CJ, Baik HS, Jung YS, Lee KJ. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus conventional treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:610-9. DOI |
7 | Ann HR, Jung YS, Lee KJ, Baik HS. Evaluation of stability after pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using cone-beam computed tomography: a comparison with conventional treatment. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:301-9. DOI |
8 | Min BK, Choi JY, Baek SH. Comparison of treatment duration between conventional three-stage method and surgery-first approach in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:1752-6. DOI |
9 | Park JK, Choi JY, Yang IH, Baek SH. Patient's satisfaction in skeletal class III cases treated with two-jaw surgery using orthognathic quality of life questionnaire: conventional three-stage method versus surgery-first approach. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:2086-93. DOI |
10 | Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(248):283-93. |
11 | Liou EJ, Chen PH, Wang YC, Yu CC, Huang CS, Chen YR. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:781-5. DOI |
12 | Ko EW, Lin SC, Chen YR, Huang CS. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:e215-23. DOI |
13 | Park KH, Sandor GK, Kim YD. Skeletal stability of surgery-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal class III malocclusion, using standardized criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:35-40. DOI |
14 | Rhee CH, Choi YK, Kim YI, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS. Correlation between skeletal and dental changes after mandibular setback surgery-first orthodontic treatment: Cone-beam computed tomographygenerated half-cephalograms. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:59-65. DOI |
15 | Wang YC, Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR, Takano-Yamamoto T. Comparison of transverse dimensional changes in surgical skeletal Class III patients with and without presurgical orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:1807-12. DOI |
16 | Kim YK, Yun PY, Moon SW, Lee YS, Lee NK. Influence of the changes in arch width on postsurgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:1820-31. DOI |
17 | Lee KM, Hwang HS, Cho JH. Comparison of transverse analysis between posteroanterior cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014;84:715-9. DOI |
18 | Ryu HS, An KY, Kang KH. Cone-beam computed tomography based evaluation of rotational patterns of dentofacial structures in skeletal Class III deformity with mandibular asymmetry. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:153-63. DOI |
19 | Lee RT. The benefits of post-surgical orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1994;21:265-74. DOI |
20 | Vanarsdall RL Jr. Transverse dimension and longterm stability. Semin Orthod 1999;5:171-80. DOI |
21 | Choi SH, Kang DY, Cha JY, Jung YS, Yu HS, Park HS, et al. Major factors contributing to anterior and posterior relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44:413-20. DOI |
22 | Jung HD, Jung YS, Kim SY, Kim DW, Park HS. Postoperative stability following bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy based on amount of setback. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:822-6. DOI |
23 | Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Lee KJ, Baik HS. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:600.e23-34. |
24 | Hwang HS, Youn IS, Lee KH, Lim HJ. Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:279.e1-6. |
25 | Baek C, Paeng JY, Lee JS, Hong J. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1161-9. DOI |
26 | Tyan S, Park HS, Janchivdorj M, Han SH, Kim SJ, Ahn HW. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2016;86:421-30. DOI |