Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.195

Targeted presurgical decompensation in patients with yaw-dependent facial asymmetry  

Kim, Kyung-A (Department of Orthodontics, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry)
Lee, Ji-Won (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Park, Jeong-Ho (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Kim, Byoung-Ho (Private Practice)
Ahn, Hyo-Won (Department of Orthodontics, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry)
Kim, Su-Jung (Department of Orthodontics, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.47, no.3, 2017 , pp. 195-206 More about this Journal
Abstract
Facial asymmetry can be classified into the rolling-dominant type (R-type), translation-dominant type (T-type), yawing-dominant type (Y-type), and atypical type (A-type) based on the distorted skeletal components that cause canting, translation, and yawing of the maxilla and/or mandible. Each facial asymmetry type represents dentoalveolar compensations in three dimensions that correspond to the main skeletal discrepancies. To obtain sufficient surgical correction, it is necessary to analyze the main skeletal discrepancies contributing to the facial asymmetry and then the skeletal-dental relationships in the maxilla and mandible separately. Particularly in cases of facial asymmetry accompanied by mandibular yawing, it is not simple to establish pre-surgical goals of tooth movement since chin deviation and posterior gonial prominence can be either aggravated or compromised according to the direction of mandibular yawing. Thus, strategic dentoalveolar decompensations targeting the real basal skeletal discrepancies should be performed during presurgical orthodontic treatment to allow for sufficient skeletal correction with stability. In this report, we document targeted decompensation of two asymmetry patients focusing on more complicated yaw-dependent types than others: Y-type and A-type. This may suggest a clinical guideline on the targeted decompensation in patient with different types of facial asymmetries.
Keywords
Facial asymmetry; Decompensation; Orthognathic surgery; Mandibular yaw;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia--hemimandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg 1986;14:183-208.   DOI
2 Kusayama M, Motohashi N, Kuroda T. Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:329-37.   DOI
3 Yang J, Lei J, Wu Y, Lu J, Ke R, Yu Q, et al. Skeleton first in surgical treatment of facial disharmony. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:336-9.   DOI
4 Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:779-85.   DOI
5 Lee H, Bayome M, Kim SH, Kim KB, Behrents RG, Kook YA. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:179-85.   DOI
6 Baek C, Paeng JY, Lee JS, Hong J. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1161-9.   DOI
7 Bruce RA, Hayward JR. Condylar hyperplasia and mandibular asymmetry: a review. J Oral Surg 1968;26:281-90.
8 Burstone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Semin Orthod 1998;4:153-64.   DOI
9 Tyan S, Park HS, Janchivdorj M, Han SH, Kim SJ, Ahn HW. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2016;86:421-30.   DOI
10 Kim HH, Ha HR, Ahn HW, Kim SJ. Anterior decompensation using segmental osteotomy for patients with mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:1392.e1-22.   DOI