Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.1.31

Factors affecting smile esthetics in adults with different types of anterior overjet malocclusion  

Cheng, Hsin-Chung (School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University)
Cheng, Pei-Chin (School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.47, no.1, 2017 , pp. 31-38 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the relationship of smile esthetic variables with various types of malocclusion, and identify the cephalometric factors affecting smile measurements. Methods: This retrospective study included 106 patients who were treated with retention at the orthodontic department of Taipei Medical University Hospital. Hard-tissue variables were measured using lateral cephalographic tracings, and nine smile esthetic variables were measured using facial photographs. The patients were divided into three groups according to their overjet (< 0, 0-4, and > 4 mm). An analysis of variance was conducted to compare the pretreatment cephalometric variables and smile esthetic variables among the three groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the cephalometric factors affecting the smile measurements in each group. Results: Except the upper midline and buccal corridor ratio, all of the smile measurements differed significantly among the three groups before orthodontic treatment. Some of the smile characteristics were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in different types of malocclusion. The overjet was the major factor influencing the smile pattern in all three types of malocclusion. Conclusions: Smile characteristics differ between different types of malocclusion; the smile may be influenced by skeletal pattern, dental procumbency, or facial type. These findings indicate that establishment of an optimal horizontal anterior teeth relationship is the key to improving the smile characteristics in different types of malocclusion.
Keywords
Smile; Esthetics; Malocclusion; Soft tissue;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Campbell CM, Millett DT, O'Callaghan A, Marsh A, McIntyre GT, Cronin M. The effect of increased overjet on the magnitude and reproducibility of smiling in adult females. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:640-5.   DOI
2 Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986;5:1-30.   DOI
3 Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:748-53.   DOI
4 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:116-27.   DOI
5 Lan HW, Cheng HC, Lee SY, Wang WN, Tsai CY. Changes in the smile after orthodontic treatment. Chin Dent J 2006;26:17-25.
6 Grippaudo C, Oliva B, Greco AL, Sferra S, Deli R. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion. Prog Orthod 2013;14:43.   DOI
7 Giuntini V, Baccetti T, Defraia E, Cozza P, Franchi L. Mesial rotation of upper first molars in Class II division 1 malocclusion in the mixed dentition: a controlled blind study. Prog Orthod 2011;12:107-13.   DOI
8 Islam R, Kitahara T, Naher L, Hara A, Nakasima A. Lip morphological changes in orthodontic treatment. Class II division 1: malocclusion and normal occlusion at rest and on smiling. Angle Orthod 2009;79:256-64.   DOI
9 Ackerman MB, Brensinger C, Landis JR. An evaluation of dynamic lip-tooth characteristics during speech and smile in adolescents. Angle Orthod 2004;74:43-50.
10 Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Br Med J 1940;2:358-9.
11 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:4-12.   DOI
12 Van Der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Berge SJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Tooth display and lip position during spontaneous and posed smiling in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:207-13.   DOI
13 Schabel BJ, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics. Angle Orthod 2010;80:490-6.
14 Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:98-111.   DOI
15 Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:221-36.
16 Celik E, Polat-Ozsoy O, Toygar Memikoglu TU. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:241-6.   DOI
17 O'Doherty J, Winston J, Critchley H, Perrett D, Burt DM, Dolan RJ. Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:147-55.   DOI
18 Schmidt KL, Cohn JF, Tian Y. Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: automatic movement in solitary and social smiles. Biol Psychol 2003;65:49-66.   DOI
19 Goldstein RE. Study of need for esthetics in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1969;21:589-98.   DOI
20 Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:2-11.   DOI
21 Yu X, Liu B, Pei Y, Xu T. Evaluation of facial attractiveness for patients with malocclusion: a machine-learning technique employing Procrustes. Angle Orthod 2014;84:410-6.   DOI
22 Frush JP, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958; 8:558-81.   DOI
23 Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57:132-44.   DOI
24 Akyalcin S, Frels LK, English JD, Laman S. Analysis of smile esthetics in American Board of Orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2014;84:486-91.   DOI
25 Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:515-23.   DOI
26 Kiekens RM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van't Hof MA, van't Hof BE, Straatman H, Maltha JC. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:188.e1-8.
27 Havens DC, McNamara JA Jr, Sigler LM, Baccetti T. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 2010;80:322-8.   DOI
28 Chang CA, Fields HW Jr, Beck FM, Springer NC, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel S, et al. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e171-80.   DOI
29 Springer NC, Chang C, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel S, et al. Smile esthetics from the layperson's perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e91-101.   DOI
30 Schabel BJ, Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4 Suppl):S72-9.   DOI