Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113

Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models  

Lee, Hyejoon (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Minji (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Chun, Youn-Sic (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.45, no.3, 2015 , pp. 113-120 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing. Methods: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as class I and the remainder were diagnosed as full cusp class II. Class I cases had four first premolars extracted, while class II cases had maxillary first premolars extracted. Occlusal contact areas were measured using a three-dimensional scanner and RapidForm 2004. Independent t-tests were used to validate comparison values between class I and II finishings. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare initial, set up, and final models. Results: Molars from cases in the class I finishing for the set-up model showed significantly greater contact areas than those from class II finishing (p < 0.05). The final model class I finishing showed significantly larger contact areas for the second molars (p < 0.05). The first molars of the class I finishing for the final model showed a tendency to have larger contact areas than those of class II finishing, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.078). Conclusions: In set-up models, posterior occlusal contact was better in class I than in class II finishing. In final models, class I finishing tended to have larger occlusal contact areas than class II finishing.
Keywords
Tooth movement; Contact area; Molar; Orthodontic treatment; Occlusion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jang SY, Kim M, Chun YS. Differences in molar relationships and occlusal contact areas evaluated from the buccal and lingual aspects using 3- dimensional digital models. Korean J Orthod 2012; 42:182-9.   DOI
2 Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S. Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth. Am J Orthod 1985;88:288-96.   DOI
3 Garrido Garcia VC, Garcia Cartagena A, Gonzalez Sequeros O. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:899-903.   DOI
4 Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 1899;41:248-64, 350-7.
5 Hellman M. An interpretation of angle's Classification of malocclusion of the teeth supported by the evidence from comparative anatomy and evolution. Dental Cosmos 1920;62:476.
6 Jang JM, Lee SB. A qualitative and quantitative study on occlusal conditions in health volunteers and athletes with normal occlusions. J Adv Prosthodont 1998;36:302-22.
7 Ehrlich J, Taicher S. Intercuspal contacts of the natural dentition in centric occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:419-21.   DOI
8 Delong R, Ko CC, Anderson GC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:622-30.   DOI
9 Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique Korean J Orthod 2014;44:69-76.   DOI
10 Liu D, Melsen B. Reappraisal of Class II molar relationships diagnosed from the lingual side. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:97-104.   DOI
11 Wheeler RC. An atlas of tooth form. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1969.
12 Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589-99.   DOI
13 Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:443-9.   DOI
14 Yoon HR, Choi YJ, Kim KH, Chung C. Comparisons of occlusal force according to occlusal relationship, skeletal pattern, age and gender in Koreans. Korean J Orthod 2010;40:304-13.   DOI
15 Yurkstas A, Manly RS. Measurement of occlusal contact area effective in mastication. Am J Orthod 1949;35:185-95.   DOI