Facial profile parameters and their relative influence on bilabial prominence and the perceptions of facial profile attractiveness: A novel approach |
Denize, Erin Stewart
(Department of Orthodontics, St. George's Hospital and King's College London Dental Institute)
McDonald, Fraser (Department of Orthodontics, King's College London Dental Institute) Sherriff, Martyn (Department of Biostatistics, Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bristol) Naini, Farhad B. (Department of Orthodontics, Kingston and St. George's Hospitals and St. George's Medical School) |
1 | Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999;14:7-18. |
2 | Mamandras AH. Growth of lips in two dimensions: a serial cephalometric study. Am J Orthod 1984;86: 61-6. DOI |
3 | Mamandras AH. Linear changes of the maxillary and mandibular lips. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:405-10. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A manual of facial growth: a computer analysis of longitudinal cephalometric growth data. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. |
5 | Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H, van der Linden FP, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:209-12. DOI |
6 | Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304. DOI |
7 | Bell R, Kiyak HA, Joondeph DR, McNeill RW, Wallen TR. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985;88:323-32. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 1973;43:34-40. |
9 | Hall D, Taylor RW, Jacobson A, Sadowsky PL, Bartolucci A. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:514-25. DOI |
10 | Naini FB. Facial aesthetics: concepts and clinical diagnosis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. |
11 | Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960;46:330-57. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Ricketts RM. The value of cephalometrics and computerized technology. Angle Orthod 1972;42: 179-99. |
13 | Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-55. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959;29:8-29. |
15 | Riedel RR. An analysis of dentofacial relationships. Am J Orthod 1957;43:103-19. DOI |
16 | Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966;52: 804-22. DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84:1-28. DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod 1984;85:279-93. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Bender R, Grouven U. Ordinal logistic regression in medical research. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1997;31: 546-51. |
20 | Weakliem DL. A critique of the bayesian information criterion for model selection. Soc Methods Res 1999;27:359-7. DOI |
21 | Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978;36:269-77. |
22 | Nguyen DD, Turley PK. Changes in the Caucasian male facial profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the twentieth century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:208-17. DOI |
23 | Yehezkel S, Turley PK. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:407-17. DOI |
24 | Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-84. DOI ScienceOn |