Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system |
Basciftci, Faruk Ayhan
(Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University)
Akin, Mehmet (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University) Ileri, Zehra (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University) Bayram, Sinem (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University) |
1 | Yu YL, Tang GH, Gong FF, Chen LL, Qian YF. A comparison of rapid palatal expansion and Damon appliance on non-extraction correction of dental crowding. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2008;17:237-42. |
2 | DiBiase AT, Nasr IH, Scott P, Cobourne MT. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e111-6. DOI |
3 | Machibya FM, Bao X, Zhao L, Hu M. Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod 2013;83:280-5. DOI |
4 | Poulton D, Vlaskalic V, Baumrind S. Treatment outcomes in 4 modes of orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:351-4. DOI |
5 | Ileri Z, Basciftci FA, Malkoc S, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:681-5. DOI |
6 | Hess DR. Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care 2004;49:1171-4. |
7 | Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:470.e1-8. DOI |
8 | Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7. DOI |
9 | Birkeland K, Furevik J, Bøe OE, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:279-88. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers- Jagtman AM, Katsaros C. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:316-23. DOI |
11 | Freitas KM, Freitas DS, Valarelli FP, Freitas MR, Janson G. PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients. Angle Orthod 2008;78:270-4. DOI |
12 | Tweed CH. The application of the principles of the edgewise arch in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1936;6:198-208. |
13 | Peck S. So what's new? Arch expansion, again. Angle Orthod 2008;78:574-5. DOI |
14 | Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Selfligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:208-15. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Al Yami EA, van't Hof MA. Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2000;107:178-81. |
16 | Tecco S, Tetè S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. World J Orthod 2009;10:290-4. |
17 | Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220-7. |
18 | Little RM. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: University of Washington studies. Semin Orthod 1999;5:191-204. DOI |
19 | Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod 2003;30:262-73. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228-34. DOI |
21 | Kim H, Kim KY, Kang YG, Kim SH, Kook YA. Clinical considerations with self-ligating brackets. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:474-82. |
22 | Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:248-53. DOI |
23 | Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:52-61. |
24 | Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:670-80. |
25 | Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e99-105. DOI |
26 | Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, Thorgeirsson T, Myrda A, Cevidanes LH, et al. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:222-33. DOI |
27 | Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:359-64. DOI |
28 | Mills JR. The long-term results of the proclination of lower incisors. Br Dent J 1966;120:355-63. |
29 | Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:340-7. DOI ScienceOn |
30 | Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ, Yancey JM, Van Stewart A, Scarfe WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1998;68:53-60. |