Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.1.44

Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets  

Bonetti, Giulio Alessandri (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna)
Parenti, Serena Incerti (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna)
Ippolito, Daniela Rita (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna)
Gatto, Maria Rosaria (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna)
Checchi, Luigi (Department of Periodontology, University of Bologna)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.44, no.1, 2014 , pp. 44-49 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets. Methods: Adhesive pre-coated metallic brackets were bonded to 72 extracted human premolars embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 24 each) to undergo no treatment (control group) or ultrasonic instrumentation with a scaler-tip angulation of $45^{\circ}$ ($45^{\circ}$-angulation group) or $0^{\circ}$ ($0^{\circ}$-angulation group). SBS was tested in a universal testing machine, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The control group had a significantly higher mean SBS value than the treated groups, which showed no significant differences in their mean SBS values. The ARI scores were not significantly different among the groups. Conclusions: Ultrasonic instrumentation around the bracket base reduces the SBS of metallic orthodontic brackets, emphasizing the need for caution during professional oral hygiene procedures in orthodontic patients. The scaler-tip angulation does not influence the SBS reduction and bond failure mode of such brackets.
Keywords
Bracket; Bonding; Oral hygiene; Ultrasonics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Checchi L, Nobili A. The importance of hygiene control in orthodontics. Prev Assist Dent 1988;14: 35-7.
2 Gwinnett AJ, Ceen RF. Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: a scanning microscope study. Am J Orthod 1979;75:667-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, Thunold K, Selvig KA. Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod 2001;23: 475-84.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Olin PS. Effect of prolonged ultrasonic instrumentation on the retention of cemented cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:563-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103:258-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Boyer DB, Engelhardt G, Bishara SE. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:262-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:145-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Walmsley AD, Jones PA, Hullah W, Harrington E. Ultrasonic debonding of composite-retained restorations. Br Dent J 1989;166:290-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Giulio AB, Matteo Z, Serena IP, Silvia M, Luigi C. In vitro evaluation of casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) effect on stripped enamel surfaces. A SEM investigation. J Dent 2009;37:228-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Alessandri Bonetti G, Zanarini M, Incerti Parenti S, Lattuca M, Marchionni S, Gatto MR. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an invivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:696-702.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M, Ortiz AJ, Canteras M. Adhesion promoters: effects on the bond strength of brackets. Am J Dent 2005;18:323-6.
12 Montasser MA, Drummond JL. Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications. Angle Orthod 2009;79:773-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Pont HB, Ozcan M, Bagis B, Ren Y. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and exvivo evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:387.e1-9; discussion 387-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Muller P, Guggenheim B, Attin T, Marlinghaus E, Schmidlin PR. Potential of shock waves to remove calculus and biofilm. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:959-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Chapple IL, Walmsley AD, Saxby MS, Moscrop H. Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome. J Periodontol 1995;66:756-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-80
17 Lombardo L, Kaplan A, Lapenta R, Bratti E, Pera C, Scuzzo G, et al. A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2011;12: 178-87.
18 Arabaci T, Cicek Y, Canakci CF. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. Int J Dent Hyg 2007;5:2-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:158-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Gwinnett AJ, Ceen RF. Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: a scanning microscope study. Am J Orthod 1979;75:667-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Zanarini M, Pazzi E, Bonetti S, Ruggeri O, Alessandri Bonetti G, Prati C. In vitro evaluation of the effects of a fluoride-releasing composite on enamel demineralization around brackets. Prog Orthod 2012;13:10-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Ristic M, Vlahovic Svabic M, Sasic M, Zelic O. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:187-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzalez- Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:188-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M. Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol 1996;67:78-85.   DOI
25 Petti S, Barbato E, Simonetti D'Arca A. Effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed and removable appliances on oral microbiota: a six-month longitudinal study. New Microbiol 1997;20:55-62.
26 Park SY, Cha JY, Kim KN, Hwang CJ. The effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calciumphosphate on the in vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:23-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO: 2003 [cited Apr 23, 2013]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/ home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm? csnumber=31486.
28 Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:68-73   DOI   ScienceOn