Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets |
Bonetti, Giulio Alessandri
(Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna)
Parenti, Serena Incerti (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna) Ippolito, Daniela Rita (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna) Gatto, Maria Rosaria (Department of Orthodontics, University of Bologna) Checchi, Luigi (Department of Periodontology, University of Bologna) |
1 | Checchi L, Nobili A. The importance of hygiene control in orthodontics. Prev Assist Dent 1988;14: 35-7. |
2 | Gwinnett AJ, Ceen RF. Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: a scanning microscope study. Am J Orthod 1979;75:667-77. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Sukontapatipark W, el-Agroudi MA, Selliseth NJ, Thunold K, Selvig KA. Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod 2001;23: 475-84. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Olin PS. Effect of prolonged ultrasonic instrumentation on the retention of cemented cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:563-5. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103:258-66. DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Boyer DB, Engelhardt G, Bishara SE. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108:262-6. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:145-53. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Walmsley AD, Jones PA, Hullah W, Harrington E. Ultrasonic debonding of composite-retained restorations. Br Dent J 1989;166:290-4. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Giulio AB, Matteo Z, Serena IP, Silvia M, Luigi C. In vitro evaluation of casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) effect on stripped enamel surfaces. A SEM investigation. J Dent 2009;37:228-32. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Alessandri Bonetti G, Zanarini M, Incerti Parenti S, Lattuca M, Marchionni S, Gatto MR. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an invivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:696-702. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M, Ortiz AJ, Canteras M. Adhesion promoters: effects on the bond strength of brackets. Am J Dent 2005;18:323-6. |
12 | Montasser MA, Drummond JL. Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications. Angle Orthod 2009;79:773-6. DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Pont HB, Ozcan M, Bagis B, Ren Y. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and exvivo evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:387.e1-9; discussion 387-9. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Muller P, Guggenheim B, Attin T, Marlinghaus E, Schmidlin PR. Potential of shock waves to remove calculus and biofilm. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:959-65. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Chapple IL, Walmsley AD, Saxby MS, Moscrop H. Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome. J Periodontol 1995;66:756-60. DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-80 |
17 | Lombardo L, Kaplan A, Lapenta R, Bratti E, Pera C, Scuzzo G, et al. A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2011;12: 178-87. |
18 | Arabaci T, Cicek Y, Canakci CF. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. Int J Dent Hyg 2007;5:2-12. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:158-63. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Gwinnett AJ, Ceen RF. Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: a scanning microscope study. Am J Orthod 1979;75:667-77. DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Zanarini M, Pazzi E, Bonetti S, Ruggeri O, Alessandri Bonetti G, Prati C. In vitro evaluation of the effects of a fluoride-releasing composite on enamel demineralization around brackets. Prog Orthod 2012;13:10-6. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Ristic M, Vlahovic Svabic M, Sasic M, Zelic O. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:187-95. DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, Gonzalez- Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:188-94. DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M. Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol 1996;67:78-85. DOI |
25 | Petti S, Barbato E, Simonetti D'Arca A. Effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed and removable appliances on oral microbiota: a six-month longitudinal study. New Microbiol 1997;20:55-62. |
26 | Park SY, Cha JY, Kim KN, Hwang CJ. The effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calciumphosphate on the in vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:23-8. DOI ScienceOn |
27 | International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO: 2003 [cited Apr 23, 2013]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/ home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm? csnumber=31486. |
28 | Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40. DOI ScienceOn |
29 | Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:68-73 DOI ScienceOn |
![]() |