The effect of western adaptation of Hispanic-Americans on their assessment of Korean facial profiles |
Toureno, Leo
(Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University)
Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) Bayome, Mohamed (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) Park, Jae Hyun (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University) |
1 | Turkkahraman H, Gokalp H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population. Angle Orthod 2004;74:640-7. |
2 | Park NS, Park JH, Bayome M, Mo SS, Kim Y, Kook YA. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:637-42. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Giddon DB, Sconzo R, Kinchen JA, Evans CA. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod 1996;66:441-8. |
4 | Marin G, Gamba RJ. A new measurement of acculturation for Hispanics: The Bidimensional Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (BAS). Hisp J Behav Sci 1996;18:297-316. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Snedecor G, Cochran W. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1989. |
6 | Ennis S, Rios-Vargas M, Albert N. The Hispanic population: 2010 [Internet]. US Census Bureau. 2011 [cited 2011 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www. census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-04.pdf. |
7 | Garcia CJ. Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Downs and Steiner analyses. Am J Orthod 1975;68:67-74. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Monger R, Yankay J. U.S. Legal Permanent Residents: 2010 [Internet]. US Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics. 2011 Apr [cited 2011 Nov 24]. Available at: www.dhs.gov/ xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/lpr_fr_2010. pdf. |
9 | Grieco EM, Revelyan EN. Place of Birth of the Foreign- Born Population: 2009 [Internet]. U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau. 2010 Feb [cited 2011 Nov 24]. Available at: www.census.gov/prod/ 2010pubs/acsbr09-15.pdf. |
10 | Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84:1-28. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod 1984;85:279-93. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966;52: 804-22. DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-84. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Chan EK, Soh J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133:532-8. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:180-7. DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans-an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:240-50. DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:1-7. |
18 | Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 1973;43:34-40. |
19 | Ioi H, Shimomura T, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL. Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:490-5. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Kuroda S, Sugahara T, Takabatake S, Taketa H, Ando R, Takano-Yamamoto T. Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:73-8. DOI ScienceOn |
21 | McKoy-White J, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:17-23. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Mejia-Maidl M, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod2005;75:953-8. |
23 | Nomura M, Motegi E, Hatch JP, Gakunga PT, Ng'ang'a PM, Rugh JD, et al. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4 Suppl): S87-95. DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Park YS, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists. World J Orthod 2006;7:286-92. |
25 | Polk MS Jr, Farman AG, Yancey JA, Gholston LR, Johnson BE, Regennitter FJ. Soft tissue profile: a survey of African-American preference. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:90-101. DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Shimomura T, Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e291-7. DOI ScienceOn |
27 | Tufekci E, Jahangiri A, Lindauer SJ. Perception of profile among laypeople, dental students and orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2008;78:983-7. DOI ScienceOn |
28 | De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984;86:67-73. DOI ScienceOn |
29 | Sarver DM. The esthetic impact of orthodontics: planning treatment to meet patients' needs. J AmDent Assoc 1993;124:99-102. |