Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.5.235

Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket system  

Sung, Jang-Won (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Kwon, Tae-Yub (Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Kyung, Hee-Moon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.43, no.5, 2013 , pp. 235-241 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether extension of the custom base is necessary for enhancement of bond strength, by comparing the debonding forces and residual adhesives of 3 different lingual bracket systems. Methods: A total of 42 extracted upper premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 14 each for bonding with brackets having (1) a conventional limited resin custom base; (2) an extended gold alloy custom base: Incognito${TM}$; and (3) an extended resin custom base: KommonBase${TM}$. The bonding area was measured by scanning the bracket bases with a 3-dimensional digital scanner. The debonding force was measured with an Instron universal testing machine, which applied an occlusogingival shear force. Results: The mean debonding forces were 60.83 N (standard deviation [SD] 10.12), 69.29 N (SD 9.59), and 104.35 N (SD17.84) for the limited resin custom base, extended gold alloy custom base, and extended resin custom base, respectively. The debonding force observed with the extended resin custom base was significantly different from that observed with the other bases. In addition, the adhesive remnant index was significantly higher with the extended gold alloy custom base. Conclusions: All 3 custom-base lingual brackets can withstand occlusal and orthodontic forces. We conclude that effective bonding of lingual brackets can be obtained without extension of the custom base.
Keywords
Lingual; Bracket; Bonding;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Komori A, Fujisawa M, Iguchi S. KommonBase for precise direct bonding of lingual orthodontic brackets. Int Orthod 2010;8:14-27.
2 Kyung HM. Individual indirect bonding technique (IIBT) using set-up model. Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi 1989;27:73-82.
3 Wiechmann D. A new bracket system for lingual orthodontic treatment. Part 1: Theoretical background and development. J Orofac Orthop 2002;63: 234-45.   DOI
4 Fillion D. Clinical advantages of the Orapix-straight wire lingual technique. Int Orthod 2010;8:125-51.
5 Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.   DOI
6 Gittner R, Müller-Hartwich R, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Influence of various storage media on shear bond strength and enamel fracture when debonding ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Semin Orthod 2010; 16:49-54.   DOI
7 Finnema KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:615-22.e3.   DOI
8 Stanford SK, Wozniak WT, Fan PL. The need for standardization of test protocols. Semin Orthod 1997;3:206-9.   DOI
9 Powers JM, Kim HB, Turner DS. Orthodontic adhesives and bond strength testing. Semin Orthod 1997;3:147-56.   DOI
10 Park SB, Son WS, Ko CC, García-Godoy F, Park MG, Kim HI, et al. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent Mater J 2009;28:730-4.   DOI
11 Ryou DB, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1105-9.   DOI
12 D'Attilio M, Traini T, Di Iorio D, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use. Angle Orthod 2005;75:410-5.
13 Tecco S, Traini T, Caputi S, Festa F, de Luca V, D'Attilio M. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Angle Orthod 2005;75:672-7.
14 Mavropoulos A, Cattani-Lorente M, Krejci I, Staudt CB. Kinetics of light-cure bracket bonding: power density vs exposure duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:543-7.   DOI
15 Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, Boehme A, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cured with high-intensity halogen, lightemitting diode, and plasma arc lights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:541-6.   DOI
16 Silta YT, Dunn WJ, Peters CB. Effect of shorter polymerization times when using the latest generation of light-emitting diodes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:744-8.   DOI
17 Yi GK, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:577-81.   DOI
18 Swanson T, Dunn WJ, Childers DE, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:337-41.   DOI
19 Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Boehme A, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of composite resin. Angle Orthod 2005;75:386-91.
20 Klocke A, Shi J, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2003;73:176-80.
21 Linn BJ, Berzins DW, Dhuru VB, Bradley TG. A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:289-94.
22 Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.
23 Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angle Orthod 2006;76:851-6.
24 Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:13-23.   DOI
25 MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:276-81.   DOI
26 Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:65-70.   DOI
27 Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:74-82.   DOI