Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.62

New three-dimensional cephalometric analyses among adults with a skeletal Class I pattern and normal occlusion  

Bayome, Mohamed (Graduate School, The Catholic University of Korea)
Park, Jae Hyun (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health, A.T. Still University)
Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.43, no.2, 2013 , pp. 62-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess new three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric variables, and to evaluate the relationships among skeletal and dentoalveolar variables through 3D cephalometric analysis. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired from 38 young adults (18 men and 20 women; $22.6{\pm}3.2$ years) with normal occlusion. Thirty-five landmarks were digitized on the 3D-rendered views. Several measurements were obtained for selected landmarks. Correlations among different variables were calculated by means of Pearson's correlation coefficient values. Results: The body of the mandible had a longer curve length in men ($102.3{\pm}4.4$ mm) than in women ($94.5{\pm}4.7$ mm) (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the maxillary basal curve length. Men had significantly larger facial dimensions, whereas women had a larger gonial angle ($117.0{\pm}4.0$ vs. $113.8{\pm}3.3$; p < 0.001). Strong-to-moderate correlation values were found among the vertical and transverse variables (r = 0.71 to 0.51). Conclusions: The normative values of new 3D cephalometric parameters, including the maxillary and mandibular curve length, were obtained. Strong-to-moderate correlation values were found among several vertical and transverse variables through 3D cephalometric analysis. This method of cephalometric analyses can be useful in diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with dentofacial deformities.
Keywords
Three-dimensional cephalometrics; Three-dimensional diagnosis and treatment planning; Ethnic norms; Anatomy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111-27.   DOI
2 Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The cephalometric projection. Part II. Principles of image distortion in cephalography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1983;12:101-8.
3 Kusnoto B, Evans CA, BeGole EA, de Rijk W. Assess ment of 3-dimensional computer-generated ce phalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:390-9.   DOI
4 Rousset MM, Simonek F, Dubus JP. A method for correction of radiographic errors in serial threedimen sional cephalometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:50-9.   DOI
5 Nakasima A, Terajima M, Mori N, Hoshino Y, Tokumori K, Aoki Y, et al. Three-dimensional compu ter-generated head model reconstructed from cephalograms, facial photographs, and dental cast models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127:282-92.   DOI
6 Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: conebeam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:312.e1-10.
7 Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103:534-42.   DOI
8 Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:369-75.   DOI
9 Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker SF, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Three-dimensional conebeam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:44-50.   DOI
10 van Vlijmen OJ, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:300-5.   DOI
11 van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Swennen GR, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38: 773-8.   DOI
12 Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Manzi FR, Brooks SL, McNamara JA Jr. From 2D to 3D: an algorithm to derive normal values for 3-dimensional computerized assessment. Angle Orthod 2011;81:3-10.   DOI
13 Farronato G, Garagiola U, Dominici A, Periti G, de Nardi S, Carletti V, et al. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod 2010;11:2-12.   DOI
14 Cheung LK, Chan YM, Jayaratne YS, Lo J. Threedimen sional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112:e56-73.   DOI
15 You KH, Lee KJ, Lee SH, Baik HS. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and man dibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:540.   DOI
16 Ratner B. Statistical modeling and analysis for database marketing: effective techniques for mining big data. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2003. p.17
17 Lee H, Bayome M, Kim SH, Kim KB, Behrents RG, Kook YA. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:179-85.   DOI
18 Lee CT. Standards for Korean adult facial relationships by various roentgeno-cephalometric analysis. Korean J Orthod 1988;18:459-74.
19 Huntjens E, Kiss G, Wouters C, Carels C. Condylar asymmetry in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis assessed by cone-beam computed tomo graphy. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:545-51.   DOI
20 Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996. p. 72.
21 Kim EJ, Palomo JM, Kim SS, Lim HJ, Lee KM, Hwang HS. Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients. Angle Orthod 2011;81:988-93   DOI
22 Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod 1978;48:141-8.
23 Thilander B, Persson M, Adolfsson U. Roentgencephalometric standards for a Swedish population. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:370-89.   DOI
24 Shaw RB Jr, Kahn DM. Aging of the midface bony elements: a three-dimensional computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:675-81.   DOI