Comparison between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusions utilizing cone-beam computed tomography |
Suk, Kyung Eun
(Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Park, Jae Hyun (Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University) Bayome, Mohamed (Department of Dentistry, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) Nam, Young-Ok (Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonkwang Health Science University) Sameshima, Glenn T. (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Southern California) Kook, Yoon-Ah (Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) |
1 | Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, et al. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomo graphy study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138:262.e1-262.e1-11. |
2 | Bayome M. Evaluation of three-dimensional relationships among skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue variables in normal occlusion sample [doctorial dissertation]. Seoul, Korea: The Catholic University of Korea; 2011. |
3 | Kuntz TR, Staley RN, Bigelow HF, Kremenak CR, Kohout FJ, Jakobsen JR. Arch widths in adults with Class I crowded and Class III malocclusions compared with normal occlusions. Angle Orthod 2008;78:597-603. DOI |
4 | Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different maloc - clu sions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:459-65. |
5 | Uysal T, Usumez S, Memili B, Sari Z. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2005;75:809-13. |
6 | Slaj M, Spalj S, Pavlin D, Illes D, Slaj M. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III. Angle Orthod 2010;80:919-24. DOI |
7 | Braun S, Hnat WP, Fender DE, Legan HL. The form of the human dental arch. Angle Orthod 1998;68:29-36. |
8 | Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309. DOI |
9 | Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J 2000;1:13-22. |
10 | Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciğer S, Ariyürek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:15-26. DOI |
11 | Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement. J Dent 2011;39:764-70. DOI |
12 | Howes AE. A polygon portrayal of coronal and basal arch dimensions in the horizontal plane. Am J Orthod 1954;40:811-31. DOI |
13 | Kim KY, Bayome M, Kim K, Han SH, Kim Y, Baek SH, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:288-96. DOI |
14 | Sergl HG, Kerr WJ, McColl JH. A method of measuring the apical base. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:479-83. DOI |
15 | Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106-14. DOI |
16 | Scheid RC, Weiss G, Woelfel JB. Woelfel's dental anatomy. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. |
17 | Bayome M, Sameshima GT, Kim Y, Nojima K, Baek SH, Kook YA. Comparison of arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e245-52. DOI |
18 | Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:680-6. DOI |
19 | Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, Sinclair PM. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:195-200. |
20 | Howes AE. Model analysis for treatment planning: a portion of a symposium on case analysis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1952;38:183-207. DOI |
21 | Rees DJ. A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth. Am J Orthod 1953;39:695-707. DOI |
22 | Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803. DOI |
23 | Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303. |
24 | Ball RL, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:41-50. DOI |
25 | Gupta D, Miner RM, Arai K, Will LA. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:10.e1-8. |
26 | Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134: 430-8. DOI |
27 | Cha BK, Lee YH, Lee NK, Choi DS, Baek SH. Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device. Angle Orthod 2008;78:403-8. DOI |
28 | Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:17.e1-9. |
29 | Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam com puted tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:16.e1-11. |
![]() |