Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.4.218

In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignment  

Cordasco, Giancarlo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina)
Giudice, Antonino Lo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina)
Militi, Angela (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina)
Nucera, Riccardo (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina)
Triolo, Giuseppe (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina)
Matarese, Giovanni (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Messina)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.42, no.4, 2012 , pp. 218-224 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the resistance to sliding (RS) in self-ligating and conventional ligation bracket systems at 5 different second-order bracket angulations by using low-stiffness alignment wires in a 3-bracket experimental model and to verify the performance of the main RS components in both systems when these wires are used. Methods: Interactive self-ligating brackets with closed and open slides were used for the self-ligating (SL) and conventional ligation (CL) groups, respectively; elastomeric ligatures (1 mm inner diameter) were used in the latter system. The alignment wire used was 0.014 inch heat-activated NiTi (austenitic finish temperature set at $36^{\circ}C$ by the manufacturer). A custom-made testing machine was used to measure frictional resistance. Tests were repeated 5 times at every angulation simulated. All data were analyzed statistically. Results: The RS increased significantly with increasing angulation in both SL and CL groups (p < 0.0001). However, the RS values were significantly higher at every angulation (p < 0.0001) in the CL group. Conclusions: Despite the relevance of the binding phenomenon, ligation forces predominantly affect the RS when lowstiffness alignment wires are used.
Keywords
Bracket; Wire;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wilkinson PD, Dysart PS, Hood JA, Herbison GP. Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickeltitanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:483-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Matarese G, Nucera R, Militi A, Mazza M, Portelli M, Festa F, et al. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:708-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Moore RJ, Watts JT, Hood JA, Burritt DJ. Intra-oral temperature variation over 24 hours. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:249-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Liaw YC, Su YY, Lai YL, Lee SY. Stiffness and frictional resistance of a superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wire with low-stress hysteresis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:578.e12-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Marshall SD, Currier GF, Hatch NE, Huang GJ, Nah HD, Owens SE, et al. Ask us. Self-ligating bracket claims. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138:128-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Aversa R, Apicella D, Perillo L, Sorrentino R, Zarone F, Ferrari M, et al. Non-linear elastic three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of endocrown material rigidity on alveolar bone remodeling process. Dent Mater 2009;25:678-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Moore MM, Harrington E, Rock WP. Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:579-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kim TK, Kim KD, Baek SH. Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:187.e15-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Nishio C, da Motta AF, Elias CN, Mucha JN. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:56-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lucchese A, Carinci F, Brunelli G, Monguzzi R. An in vitro study of resistance to corrosion in brazed and laser-welded orthodontic appliances. Eur J Inflamm 2011;9:67-72.
11 Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:416-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Khambay B, Millett D, McHugh S. Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:302-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chimenti C, Franchi L, Di Giuseppe MG, Lucci M. Friction of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions. Angle Orthod 2005;75:421-5.
14 Stefanos S, Secchi AG, Coby G, Tanna N, Mante FK. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:463-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:589-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Articolo LC, Kusy RP. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop 1999;115:39-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:295-305.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher HA. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:397-404.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:472-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod 1980;78:593-609.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kusy RP. Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium. Angle Orthod 2000;70:366-76.
22 Burrow SJ. Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:442-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:283-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod 2004;74:202-11.
25 Henao SP, Kusy RP. Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design. Angle Orthod 2005;75:75-85.
26 Dowling PA, Jones WB, Lagerstrom L, Sandham JA. An investigation into the behavioural characteristics of orthodontic elastomeric modules. Br J Orthod 1998;25:197-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson MG Jr, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:117-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Thorstenson G, Kusy R. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 2003;73:167-75.
29 Voudouris JC, Schismenos C, Lackovic K, Kuftinec MM. Self-ligation esthetic brackets with low frictional resistance. Angle Orthod 2010;80:188-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Doshi UH, Bhad-Patil WA. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139:74-9.   DOI   ScienceOn