Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.73

Maxillary expansion with the memory screw: a preliminary investigation  

Halicioglu, Koray (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Abant Izzet Baysal University)
Kiki, Ali (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University)
Yavuz, Ibrahim (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.42, no.2, 2012 , pp. 73-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a newly developed rapid maxillary expansion screw-the memory screw-over 6 months. Methods: Five subjects, aged between 11.7 and 13.75 years, were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent placement of a maxillary expansion appliance containing superelastic nickel-titanium open-coil springs in its screw bed. The parents of the patients and/or the patients themselves were instructed to activate the expansion screw by 2 quarter-turns 3 times a day (morning, midday, and evening; 6 quarter-turns a day). The mean expansion period was $7.52{\pm}1.04$ days. Dentoskeletal effects of the procedure, including dentoalveolar inclination, were evaluated. Measurements of all the parameters were repeated after 6 months of retention in order to check for relapse. Results: Sella-Nasion-A point (SNA) and Sella-Nasion/Gonion-Menton angles increased, and Sella-Nasion-B point (SNB) angle decreased in all the subjects during the expansion phase. However, they approximated to the initial values at the end of 6 months. On the other hand, the increments in maxillary apical base (Mxr-Mxl) and intermolar widths was quite stable. As expected, some amount of dentoalveolar tipping was observed. Conclusions: The newly developed memory expansion screw offers advantages of both rapid and slow expansion procedures. It widens the midpalatal suture and expands the maxilla with relatively lighter forces and within a short time. In addition, the resultant increments in the maxillary apical base and intermolar width remained quite stable even aft er 6 months of retention.
Keywords
Expansion; Appliances; Cephalometrics; Retention and stability;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Harberson VA, Myers DR. Midpalatal suture opening during functional posterior cross-bite correction. Am J Orthod 1978;74:310-3.
2 Arndt WV. Nickel titanium palatal expander. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:129-37.
3 Wichelhaus A, Geserick M, Ball J. A new nickel titanium rapid maxillary expansion screw. J Clin Orthod 2004;38:677-80.
4 Oktay H, Kilic N. Evaluation of the inclination in posterior dentoalveolar structures after rapid maxillary expansion: a new method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:356-9.
5 Biederman W. Rapid correction of Class 3 malocclusion by midpalatal expansion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:47-55.
6 Kilic N, Kiki A, Oktay H. A comparison of dentoalveolar inclination treated by two palatal expan ders. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:67-72.
7 Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1970;57:219-55.
8 Hicks EP. Slow maxillary expansion. A clinical study of the skeletal versus dental response to low-magnitude force. Am J Orthod 1978;73:121-41.
9 Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening. Am J Orthod 1970;58:41-66.
10 Mossaz-Joelson K, Mossaz CF. Slow maxillary expansion: a comparison between banded and bonded appliances. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:67-76.
11 Ciambotti C, Ngan P, Durkee M, Kohli K, Kim H. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:11-20.
12 Sarver DM, Johnston MW. Skeletal changes in vertical and anterior displacement of the maxilla with bonded rapid palatal expansion appliances. Am J Orthod Dento facial Orthop 1989;95:462-6.
13 Krebs AA. Expansion of mid palatal suture studied by means of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand 1959;17:491-501.
14 Sarnas KV, Bjork A, Rune B. Long-term effect of rapid maxillary expansion studied in one patient with the aid of metallic implants and roentgen stereometry. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:427-32.
15 Kurol J, Berglund L. Longitudinal study and costbenefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of poste rior cross-bites in the primary dentition. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:173-9.
16 Lamparski DG Jr, Rinchuse DJ, Close JM, Sciote JJ. Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2-point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:321-8.
17 Angell EC. Treatment of irregularities of the permanent or adult teeth. Dent Cosmos 1860;1:540-4.
18 Isaacson RJ, Ingram AH. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. II. Forces present during treatment. Angle Orthod 1964;34:261-70.
19 Haas AJ. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 1961;31:73-90.
20 Isaacson RJ, Wood JL, Ingram AH. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. I. Design of the force measuring system. Angle Orthod 1964;34:256-60.
21 Zimring JF, Isaacson RJ. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. III. forces present during retention. Angle Orthod 1965;35:178-86.
22 Darendeliler MA, Strahm C, Joho JP. Light maxillary expansion forces with the magnetic expansion device. A preliminary investigation. Eur J Orthod 1994;16: 479-90.
23 Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Voss LR. Stability of magnetic versus mechanical palatal expansion. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:107-15.