Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.6.447

Direct and indirect bonding of wire retainers to bovine enamel using three resin systems: shear bond strength comparisons  

Kwon, Tae-Yub (Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Meina, Hu (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Antoszewska, Joana (Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University)
Park, Hyo-Sang (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.41, no.6, 2011 , pp. 447-453 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: We compared the shear bond strength (SBS) of lingual retainers bonded to bovine enamel with three different resins using direct and indirect methods. Methods: Both ends of pre-fabricated twisted ligature wires were bonded to bovine enamel surfaces using Light-Core, Tetric N-Flow, or Transbond XT. Phosphoric acid-etched enamel surfaces were primed with One-Step prior to bonding with Light-Core or Tetric N-Flow. Transbond XT primer was used prior to bonding with Transbond XT. After 24 hours in water at $37^{\circ}C$, we performed SBS tests on the samples. We also assigned adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding and predicted the clinical performance of materials and bonding techniques from Weibull analyses. Results: Direct bonding produced significantly higher SBS values than indirect bonding for all materials. The SBS for Light-Core was significantly higher than that for Tetric N-Flow, and there was no significant difference between the direct bonding SBS of Transbond XT and that of Light-Core. Weibull analysis indicated Light-Core performed better than other indirectly bonded resins. Conclusions: When the SBS of a wire retainer is of primary concern, direct bonding methods are superior to indirect bonding methods. Light-Core may perform better than Transbond XT or Tetric N-Flow when bonded indirectly.
Keywords
Lingual bonded retainer; Shear bond strength; Direct and indirect bonding;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Little RM, Riedel RA, Engst ED. Serial extraction of first premolars-- postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1990;60:255-262.
2 Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97:393-404.   DOI
3 Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:423-428.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;25:CD002283.
5 Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA, Tahir E. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106: 243-249.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod 1977;71:440-448.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:207-213.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:67-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Sondhi A. Efficient and effective indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:352-359.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:62-78.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Hosier MJ. Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:302-307.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Cadenaro M, Marchesi G, Antoniolli F, Davidson C, De Stefano Dorigo E, Breschi L. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater 2009; 25:649-654.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Albers HF. Tooth-colored restoratives: principles and techniques. 9th ed. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker; 2002. p. 111-25.
14 Isci D, Sahin Saglam AM, Alkis H, Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T. Effects of fluorosis on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:161-166.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Uysal T, Ulker M, Baysal A, Usumez S. Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:941-946.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Ryou DB, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1105-1109.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Toroglu MS, Yaylali S. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134: 181e1-7.
18 Aguirre MJ, King GJ, Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1982;82:269-276.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Hocevar RA, Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:367-371.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Yi GK, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:577-581.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Martin S, Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:615-620.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:316-323.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115: 24-28.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Elekdag-Turk S, Turk T, Isci D, Ozkalayci N. Thermocycling effects on shear bond strength of a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod 2008;78:351-356.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 McCabe JF, Walls AW. The treatment of results for tensile bond strength testing. J Dent 1986;14:165-168.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21:33-43.   DOI
27 Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:514-519.   DOI   ScienceOn