Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.96.376

Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different types of maxillary molar distalization appliances  

Kim, Su-Jin (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Chun, Youn-Sic (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Jung, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Park, Sun-Hyung (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The korean journal of orthodontics / v.38, no.6, 2008 , pp. 376-387 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the three dimensional changes of tooth movement using four different types of maxillary molar distalization appliances; pendulum appliance (PD), mini-implant supported pendulum appliance (MPD), stainless steel open coil spring (SP) and mini-implant supported stainless steel open coil spring (MSP). Methods: These experiments were performed using the Calorific $machine^{(R)}$ which can simulate dynamic tooth movement. Computed tomography (CT) images of the experimental model were taken before and after tooth movement in 1 mm thicknesses and reconstructed into a three dimensional model using V-works $4.0^{TM}$. These reconstructed images were superimposed using Rapidform $2004^{TM}$ and the direction and amount of tooth movement were measured. Results: The mean reciprocal anchor loss ratio at the first premolar was 17 - 19% for the PD and SP groups. The appliances using mini-implants (MPD or MSP) resulted in less anchorage loss (7 - 8%). On application of a pendulum appliance or MPD, distalization was obtained by tipping rather than by bodily movement. Furthermore, the maxillary second molar tipped distally and bucally. But on application of MSP, distalization was achieved almost by bodily movement. Conclusions: Regarding tooth movement patterns during molar distalization, stainless steel open coil spring with indirect skeletal anchorage was relatively superior to other methods.
Keywords
Molar distalization; Mini-implant; Indirect anchorage; Calorific machine;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 5  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jones RD, White JM. Rapid Class II molar correction with an open-coil jig. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:661-4   PUBMED
2 Carano A, Testa M. The distal jet for upper molar distalization. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:374-80   PUBMED
3 Karlsson I, Bondemark L. Intraoral maxillary molar distalization. Angle Orthod 2006;76:923-9   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ogura M, Yamagata K, Kubota S, Kim JH, Kuroe K, Ito G. Comparison of tooth movements using Friction-Free and preadjusted edgewise bracket systems. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:325-30
5 Chun YS, Row J, Suh MS, Park IK. An experimental study on the dynamic tooth moving effects of two precision lingual archs (Pla) for correction posterior scissor bite by the calorific machine. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:29-41   과학기술학회마을
6 Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:639-46   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Wehrbein H, Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:678-86   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Chang HN, Hsiao HY, Tsai CM, Roberts WE. Bone-screw anchorage for pendulum appliances and other fixed mechanics applications. Semin Orthod 2006;12:284-9   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bondemark L, Kurol J. Class II correction with magnets and superelastic coils followed by straight-wire mechanotherapy. Occlusal changes during and after dental therapy. J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:127-38   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Gianelly AA, Vaitas AS, Thomas WM. The use of magnets to move molars distally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:161-7   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Keles A, Erverdi N, Sezen S. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage. Angle Orthod 2003;73:471-82   PUBMED
12 Chaconas SJ, Caputo AA, Harvey K. Orthodontic force characteristics of open coil springs. Am J Orthod 1984;85:494-7   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Weijs WA, de Jongh HJ. Strain in mandibular alveolar bone during mastication in the rabbit. Arch Oral Biol 1977;22:667-75   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Carano A, Velo S, Leone P, Siciliani G. Clinical applications of the Miniscrew Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:9-24
15 Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706-14   PUBMED
16 Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK Jr, Roberts WE, Garetto LP. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 2003;82:377-81   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ. Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod 1980;77:396-409   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Pieringer M, Droschl H, Permann R. Distalization with a Nance appliance and coil springs. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:321-6
19 Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:650-9   PUBMED
20 Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M. Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:169-78   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Chang YJ, Lee HS, Chun YS. Microscrew anchorage for molar intrusion. J Clin Orthod 2004;38:325-30
22 Sugawara J, Kanzaki R, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Nanda R. Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:723-33   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Yun SW, Lim WH, Chun YS. Molar control using indirect miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:661-4
24 Gianelly AA, Bednar J, Dietz VS. Japanese NiTi coils used to move molars distally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:564-6   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Wilson WL. Variations of labiolingual therapy in Class II cases. Am J Orthod 1955;41:852-71   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Moss ML, Skalak R, Patel H, Sen K, Moss-Salentijn L, Shinozuka M, et al. Finite element method modeling of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod 1985;87:453-72   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Bondemark L, Kurol J, Bernhold M. Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars. Angle Orthod 1994;64:189-98   PUBMED
28 Gianelly AA, Vaitas AS, Thomas WM, Berger DG. Distalization of molars with repelling magnets. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:40-4   PUBMED
29 Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997;67:249-60   PUBMED
30 Rhee JN, Chun YS, Row J. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:292-9   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Baeten LR. Canine retraction: a photoelastic study. Am J Orthod 1975;67:11-23   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
32 Caputo AA, Chaconas SJ, Hayashi RK. Photoelastic visualization of orthodontic forces during canine retraction. Am J Orthod 1974;65:250-9   DOI   ScienceOn